Restoring with risk: perceptions of reservoir flood risk in Whaley Bridge

Q4 Earth and Planetary Sciences Dams and Reservoirs Pub Date : 2023-12-13 DOI:10.1680/jdare.23.00500
Sophie Hancock
{"title":"Restoring with risk: perceptions of reservoir flood risk in Whaley Bridge","authors":"Sophie Hancock","doi":"10.1680/jdare.23.00500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Understanding flood risk perceptions is critical for effective flood risk communication. In 2019, heavy rainfall triggered the failure of Toddbrook Reservoir's spillway resulting in a severe flood warning being issued for the Whaley Bridge area. In 2022, a large-scale restoration began at the reservoir. This paper describes perceptions of reservoir flood risk by the residents of Whaley Bridge and experts in environmental science and engineering. Results show that risk perception varies, with residents perceiving reservoir flood risk subjectively and experts perceiving risk objectively. With no previous risk communication, residents did not consider there to be a risk of reservoir failure; moreover, they have trust in Toddbrook's restoration. Meanwhile, experts emphasize that risk can never be fully eliminated, but that the probability of failure is extremely low. Climate change is considered by some as a contributing factor to the event and uncertainties in the risks that it poses has meant that there is a requirement to improve and maintain existing dams to mitigate risk. Findings have demonstrated the importance of more advanced risk communication as well as a necessity to improve flood risk maps for accessibility, awareness and to better account for the probability of failure in order to avoid the misinterpretation of risk. By identifying differing perceptions of risk between experts and residents, data results can be used to enhance reservoir risk communication. This paper is based on the author's undergraduate thesis titled ‘Restoring with Risk: Perceptions of Reservoir Flood Risk in Whaley Bridge’ at Bath Spa University in 2023.","PeriodicalId":39070,"journal":{"name":"Dams and Reservoirs","volume":"84 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dams and Reservoirs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jdare.23.00500","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Understanding flood risk perceptions is critical for effective flood risk communication. In 2019, heavy rainfall triggered the failure of Toddbrook Reservoir's spillway resulting in a severe flood warning being issued for the Whaley Bridge area. In 2022, a large-scale restoration began at the reservoir. This paper describes perceptions of reservoir flood risk by the residents of Whaley Bridge and experts in environmental science and engineering. Results show that risk perception varies, with residents perceiving reservoir flood risk subjectively and experts perceiving risk objectively. With no previous risk communication, residents did not consider there to be a risk of reservoir failure; moreover, they have trust in Toddbrook's restoration. Meanwhile, experts emphasize that risk can never be fully eliminated, but that the probability of failure is extremely low. Climate change is considered by some as a contributing factor to the event and uncertainties in the risks that it poses has meant that there is a requirement to improve and maintain existing dams to mitigate risk. Findings have demonstrated the importance of more advanced risk communication as well as a necessity to improve flood risk maps for accessibility, awareness and to better account for the probability of failure in order to avoid the misinterpretation of risk. By identifying differing perceptions of risk between experts and residents, data results can be used to enhance reservoir risk communication. This paper is based on the author's undergraduate thesis titled ‘Restoring with Risk: Perceptions of Reservoir Flood Risk in Whaley Bridge’ at Bath Spa University in 2023.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
有风险的恢复:对 Whaley Bridge 水库洪水风险的看法
了解洪水风险认知对于有效的洪水风险沟通至关重要。2019 年,暴雨引发 Toddbrook 水库溢洪道溃坝,导致 Whaley Bridge 地区发布严重洪水预警。2022 年,水库开始进行大规模修复。本文介绍了惠利桥居民和环境科学与工程专家对水库洪水风险的看法。结果显示,风险认知存在差异,居民对水库洪水风险的认知是主观的,而专家对风险的认知是客观的。由于之前没有进行过风险交流,居民并不认为存在水库溃坝的风险;此外,他们还对 Toddbrook 的修复工作表示信任。同时,专家强调,风险永远不可能完全消除,但溃坝的可能性极低。一些人认为气候变化是导致溃坝的一个因素,而气候变化带来的风险的不确定性意味着需要对现有大坝进行改进和维护,以降低风险。研究结果表明,进行更先进的风险交流非常重要,同时有必要改进洪水风险地图,以提高可访问性和认知度,并更好地考虑溃坝概率,从而避免对风险的误读。通过识别专家和居民对风险的不同认识,数据结果可用于加强水库风险交流。本文基于作者于 2023 年在巴斯斯帕大学完成的本科论文 "Restoring with Risk: Perceptions of Reservoir Flood Risk in Whaley Bridge"。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Dams and Reservoirs
Dams and Reservoirs Earth and Planetary Sciences-Geotechnical Engineering and Engineering Geology
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
Leeds FAS2 FSR: environmental challenges for the design of an in-river control structure Simulating a reservoir on-site flood plan test: Operation Redbrook Dunside reservoirs discontinuance – taking a new approach Undertaking RARS assessments for Hong Kong reservoirs Assessment the stability of earth dams based on construction pace by fuzzy inference logic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1