Analysis of Statistical and Deep Learning Techniques for Temperature Forecasting

Sriram G.K., Umamaheswari Rajasekaran, A. Malini, Vandana Sharma
{"title":"Analysis of Statistical and Deep Learning Techniques for Temperature\nForecasting","authors":"Sriram G.K., Umamaheswari Rajasekaran, A. Malini, Vandana Sharma","doi":"10.2174/0126662558264870231122113715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\nIn the field of meteorology, temperature forecasting is a significant task as it has\nbeen a key factor in industrial, agricultural, renewable energy, and other sectors. High accuracy\nin temperature forecasting is needed for decision-making in advance. Since temperature varies\nover time and has been studied to have non-trivial long-range correlation, non-linear behavior,\nand seasonal variability, it is important to implement an appropriate methodology to forecast\naccurately. In this paper, we have reviewed the performance of statistical approaches such as\nAR and ARIMA with RNN, LSTM, GRU, and LSTM-RNN Deep Learning models. The models were tested for short-term temperature forecasting for a period of 48 hours. Among the statistical models, the AR model showed notable performance with a r2 score of 0.955 for triennial 1 and for the same, the Deep Learning models also performed nearly equal to that of the statistical models and thus hybrid LSTM-RNN model was tested. The hybrid model obtained the\nhighest r2 score of 0.960. The difference in RMSE, MAE and r2 scores are not significantly\ndifferent for both Statistical and Vanilla Deep Learning approaches. However, the hybrid model provided a better r2 score, and LIME explanations have been generated for the same in order\nto understand the dependencies over a point forecast. Based on the reviewed results, it can be\nconcluded that for short-term forecasting, both Statistical and Deep Learning models perform\nnearly equally.\n","PeriodicalId":36514,"journal":{"name":"Recent Advances in Computer Science and Communications","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recent Advances in Computer Science and Communications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0126662558264870231122113715","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Computer Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the field of meteorology, temperature forecasting is a significant task as it has been a key factor in industrial, agricultural, renewable energy, and other sectors. High accuracy in temperature forecasting is needed for decision-making in advance. Since temperature varies over time and has been studied to have non-trivial long-range correlation, non-linear behavior, and seasonal variability, it is important to implement an appropriate methodology to forecast accurately. In this paper, we have reviewed the performance of statistical approaches such as AR and ARIMA with RNN, LSTM, GRU, and LSTM-RNN Deep Learning models. The models were tested for short-term temperature forecasting for a period of 48 hours. Among the statistical models, the AR model showed notable performance with a r2 score of 0.955 for triennial 1 and for the same, the Deep Learning models also performed nearly equal to that of the statistical models and thus hybrid LSTM-RNN model was tested. The hybrid model obtained the highest r2 score of 0.960. The difference in RMSE, MAE and r2 scores are not significantly different for both Statistical and Vanilla Deep Learning approaches. However, the hybrid model provided a better r2 score, and LIME explanations have been generated for the same in order to understand the dependencies over a point forecast. Based on the reviewed results, it can be concluded that for short-term forecasting, both Statistical and Deep Learning models perform nearly equally.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
气温预测的统计和深度学习技术分析
在气象学领域,气温预报是一项重要任务,因为它一直是工业、农业、可再生能源和其他部门的关键因素。为了提前做出决策,需要高精度的气温预报。由于气温随时间变化,而且研究表明气温具有非对称的长程相关性、非线性行为和季节变异性,因此采用适当的方法进行准确预报非常重要。在本文中,我们回顾了 RNN、LSTM、GRU 和 LSTM-RNN 深度学习模型等统计方法(如AR 和 ARIMA)的性能。我们对这些模型进行了为期 48 小时的短期气温预测测试。在统计模型中,AR 模型表现突出,三年 1 期的 r2 得分为 0.955,同样,深度学习模型的表现也几乎与统计模型相当,因此对 LSTM-RNN 混合模型进行了测试。混合模型的 r2 得分最高,为 0.960。统计方法和 Vanilla 深度学习方法的 RMSE、MAE 和 r2 分数差异不大。然而,混合模型提供了更好的 r2 分数,并生成了 LIME 解释,以了解点预测的依赖关系。根据所审查的结果,可以得出结论:对于短期预测,统计模型和深度学习模型的表现几乎相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Recent Advances in Computer Science and Communications
Recent Advances in Computer Science and Communications Computer Science-Computer Science (all)
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
142
期刊最新文献
Flood Mapping and Damage Analysis Using Multispectral Sentinel-2 Satellite Imagery and Machine Learning Techniques Efficacy of Keystroke Dynamics-Based User Authentication in the Face of Language Complexity Innovation in Knowledge Economy: A Case Study of 3D Printing's Rise in Global Markets and India Cognitive Inherent SLR Enabled Survey for Software Defect Prediction An Era of Communication Technology Using Machine Learning Techniques in Medical Imaging
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1