{"title":"What is a star worth to Medicare beneficiaries? A discrete choice experiment of hospital quality ratings","authors":"L. Trenaman, Mark Harrison, Jeffrey S Hoch","doi":"10.1093/haschl/qxad085","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Hospital quality ratings are widely available to help Medicare beneficiaries make an informed choice about where to receive care. However, how beneficiaries trade-off between different quality domains (clinical outcomes, patient experience, safety, efficiency) and other considerations (out of pocket cost, travel distance) is not well understood. We sought to study how beneficiaries make trade-offs when choosing a hypothetical hospital. We administered an online survey that included a discrete choice experiment to a nationally representative sample of one thousand and twenty-five Medicare beneficiaries. On average, beneficiaries were willing to pay $1,698 more for a hospital with a one-star higher rating on clinical outcomes. This was over twice the value of the patient experience ($691) and safety domains ($615) and nearly eight times the value of the efficiency domain ($218). We also found that the value of a one-star improvement depends not only on the quality domain, but also the baseline level of performance of the hospital. Generally, it is more valuable for low performing hospitals to achieve average performance than for average hospitals to achieve excellence.","PeriodicalId":94025,"journal":{"name":"Health affairs scholar","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health affairs scholar","FirstCategoryId":"0","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/haschl/qxad085","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Hospital quality ratings are widely available to help Medicare beneficiaries make an informed choice about where to receive care. However, how beneficiaries trade-off between different quality domains (clinical outcomes, patient experience, safety, efficiency) and other considerations (out of pocket cost, travel distance) is not well understood. We sought to study how beneficiaries make trade-offs when choosing a hypothetical hospital. We administered an online survey that included a discrete choice experiment to a nationally representative sample of one thousand and twenty-five Medicare beneficiaries. On average, beneficiaries were willing to pay $1,698 more for a hospital with a one-star higher rating on clinical outcomes. This was over twice the value of the patient experience ($691) and safety domains ($615) and nearly eight times the value of the efficiency domain ($218). We also found that the value of a one-star improvement depends not only on the quality domain, but also the baseline level of performance of the hospital. Generally, it is more valuable for low performing hospitals to achieve average performance than for average hospitals to achieve excellence.