Using Ground- and Drone-Based Surface Emission Monitoring (SEM) Data to Locate and Infer Landfill Methane Emissions

Methane Pub Date : 2023-12-11 DOI:10.3390/methane2040030
T. Abichou, Nizar Bel Hadj Ali, Sakina Amankwah, Roger Green, Eric S. Howarth
{"title":"Using Ground- and Drone-Based Surface Emission Monitoring (SEM) Data to Locate and Infer Landfill Methane Emissions","authors":"T. Abichou, Nizar Bel Hadj Ali, Sakina Amankwah, Roger Green, Eric S. Howarth","doi":"10.3390/methane2040030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Ground- and drone-based surface emission monitoring (SEM) campaigns were performed at two municipal solid waste landfills, during the same week as mobile tracer correlation method (TCM) testing was used to measure the total methane emissions from the same landfills. The G-SEM and the D-SEM data, along with wind data, were used as input into an inverse modeling approach combined with an optimization-based methane emission estimation method (implemented in a tool called SEM2Flux). This approach involves the use of backward dispersion modeling to estimate the whole-site methane emissions from a given landfill and the identification of locations and emission rates of major leaks. SEM2Flux is designed to exploit the measured surface methane concentration concurrently with wind data and tackle two problems: (1) inferring the estimates of methane rates from individual landfills, and (2) identifying the likely locations of the main emission sources. SEM2Flux results were also compared with emission estimates obtained using TCM. In Landfill B, the average TCM-measured methane emissions was 1178 Kg/h, with a standard deviation of 271 Kg/h. In Landfill C, the average TCM-measured emission rate was 601 Kg/h, with a standard deviation of 292 Kg/h. For both landfills, the D-SEM data yielded statistically similar estimates of methane emissions as the TCM-measured emissions. On the other hand, the G-SEM data yielded comparable estimates of emissions to TCM-measured emissions only for Landfill C, where the D-SEM and G-SEM data were statistically not different. The results of this study showcase the ability of this method using surface concentrations to provide a rapid and simple estimation of fugitive methane emissions from landfills. Such an approach can also be used to assess the effectiveness of different remedial actions in reducing fugitive methane emissions from a given landfill.","PeriodicalId":74177,"journal":{"name":"Methane","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Methane","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/methane2040030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ground- and drone-based surface emission monitoring (SEM) campaigns were performed at two municipal solid waste landfills, during the same week as mobile tracer correlation method (TCM) testing was used to measure the total methane emissions from the same landfills. The G-SEM and the D-SEM data, along with wind data, were used as input into an inverse modeling approach combined with an optimization-based methane emission estimation method (implemented in a tool called SEM2Flux). This approach involves the use of backward dispersion modeling to estimate the whole-site methane emissions from a given landfill and the identification of locations and emission rates of major leaks. SEM2Flux is designed to exploit the measured surface methane concentration concurrently with wind data and tackle two problems: (1) inferring the estimates of methane rates from individual landfills, and (2) identifying the likely locations of the main emission sources. SEM2Flux results were also compared with emission estimates obtained using TCM. In Landfill B, the average TCM-measured methane emissions was 1178 Kg/h, with a standard deviation of 271 Kg/h. In Landfill C, the average TCM-measured emission rate was 601 Kg/h, with a standard deviation of 292 Kg/h. For both landfills, the D-SEM data yielded statistically similar estimates of methane emissions as the TCM-measured emissions. On the other hand, the G-SEM data yielded comparable estimates of emissions to TCM-measured emissions only for Landfill C, where the D-SEM and G-SEM data were statistically not different. The results of this study showcase the ability of this method using surface concentrations to provide a rapid and simple estimation of fugitive methane emissions from landfills. Such an approach can also be used to assess the effectiveness of different remedial actions in reducing fugitive methane emissions from a given landfill.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用基于地面和无人机的地表排放监测 (SEM) 数据定位和推断垃圾填埋场甲烷排放量
在使用移动示踪相关法(TCM)测试测量同一垃圾填埋场甲烷排放总量的同一周内,在两个城市固体废物填埋场开展了地面和无人机表面排放监测(SEM)活动。G-SEM 和 D-SEM 数据以及风力数据被用作反向建模方法的输入,该方法结合了基于优化的甲烷排放估算方法(在名为 SEM2Flux 的工具中实施)。这种方法包括使用反向扩散模型来估算特定垃圾填埋场的全场甲烷排放量,并确定主要泄漏点的位置和排放率。SEM2Flux 的设计目的是利用测量到的地表甲烷浓度和风力数据,解决两个问题:(1)推断各个垃圾填埋场的甲烷排放率估计值;(2)确定主要排放源的可能位置。SEM2Flux 的结果还与使用 TCM 得出的排放估计值进行了比较。在 B 垃圾填埋场,TCM 测量的甲烷平均排放量为 1178 千克/小时,标准偏差为 271 千克/小时。在垃圾填埋场 C 中,经 TCM 测量的平均甲烷排放量为 601 千克/小时,标准偏差为 292 千克/小时。对于这两个垃圾填埋场,D-SEM 数据得出的甲烷排放量估计值与 TCM 测量的排放量在统计上相似。另一方面,只有在 C 垃圾填埋场,G-SEM 数据得出的排放量估计值与 TCM 测量的排放量相当,D-SEM 和 G-SEM 数据在统计上没有差异。这项研究的结果表明,使用表面浓度的方法能够快速、简单地估算垃圾填埋场的甲烷逃逸排放量。这种方法还可用于评估不同补救措施在减少特定垃圾填埋场甲烷逃逸性排放方面的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Application of Digestate from a Methane Fermentation Process for Supplying Water and Nutrients in Sweet Potato Cultivation in Sandy Soil Pathways toward Climate-Neutral Red Meat Production Recent Advances in the Use of Controlled Nanocatalysts in Methane Conversion Reactions Dry Reforming of CH4 Using a Microreactor A Study on the Heterogeneity and Anisotropy of the Porous Grout Body Created in the Stabilization of a Methane Hydrate Reservoir through Grouting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1