A Study of Emotion Regulation Difficulties, Repetitive Negative Thinking, and Experiential Avoidance in Adults with Stuttering: A Comparative Study

J. S. Yaztappeh, Elahe Lorestani, Younes Zaheri, Mohsen Rezaei, Hiwa Mohammadi, Keivan Kakabraee, M. Rajabi, A. Kianimoghadam, Saina Fatollahzadeh, M. Mohebi
{"title":"A Study of Emotion Regulation Difficulties, Repetitive Negative Thinking, and Experiential Avoidance in Adults with Stuttering: A Comparative Study","authors":"J. S. Yaztappeh, Elahe Lorestani, Younes Zaheri, Mohsen Rezaei, Hiwa Mohammadi, Keivan Kakabraee, M. Rajabi, A. Kianimoghadam, Saina Fatollahzadeh, M. Mohebi","doi":"10.18502/ijps.v19i1.14341","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Stuttering is a type of communication and fluency disorder that hurts mental and emotional health. It is also associated with a significant increase in both trait and social anxiety. Studies on stuttering in adults have indicated the nature and impact of this phenomenon. In addition, some psychological aspects of this phenomenon remain vague and need further investigation. Therefore, the present study aimed to compare emotion regulation difficulties, repetitive negative thinking, and experiential avoidance between people who stutter and healthy individuals. \nMethod: In this study, 101 people who stutter (43 females and 58 males, with a mean age of 29.55 ± 187 years), as well as 110 healthy individuals (74 females and 36 males, with a mean age of 25.57 ± 489 years) as participants were chosen using the convenience sampling method among those who referred to the speech therapy clinics of Tehran, Iran. Research instruments including the repetitive negative thinking inventory, Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale, and Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ-I) were used for data collection. Data were analyzed using multivariate ANOVA test and Multiple Regression Analysis. \nResults: The mean age of the participants was 29.55 years in the people who stutter and 25.57 years in the healthy individuals (P < 0.01). The present results indicated that the mean score of experiential avoidance was higher in the people who stutter (M ± SD: 35.74 ± 9.24) compared to the healthy individuals (M ± SD: 8.89 ± 31.11). Additionally, the mean score of emotion regulation difficulties was higher in the people who stutter (M ± SD: 88.75 ± 20.59) compared to the healthy individuals (M ± SD: 64.14 ± 94.94) (P < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the mean score of repetitive negative thinking between the people who stutter (M ± SD: 98.45 ± 25.85) and healthy individuals (M ± SD: 93.71 ± 25.24) groups (P > 0.05). There was a significant correlation between experiential avoidance and emotion regulation difficulties in people who stutter (P < 0.01). Experiential avoidance and repetitive negative thinking can significantly predict emotion regulation difficulties in people who stutter (R = 0.65, P < 0.01). \nConclusion: People who stutter obtained higher emotion regulation difficulties and experiential avoidance scores than those without stuttering and A significant correlation between experiential avoidance and emotion regulation difficulties was found. Future studies should consider the role of emotion regulation difficulties and experiential avoidance in people who stutter. \n ","PeriodicalId":38866,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"169 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijps.v19i1.14341","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Stuttering is a type of communication and fluency disorder that hurts mental and emotional health. It is also associated with a significant increase in both trait and social anxiety. Studies on stuttering in adults have indicated the nature and impact of this phenomenon. In addition, some psychological aspects of this phenomenon remain vague and need further investigation. Therefore, the present study aimed to compare emotion regulation difficulties, repetitive negative thinking, and experiential avoidance between people who stutter and healthy individuals. Method: In this study, 101 people who stutter (43 females and 58 males, with a mean age of 29.55 ± 187 years), as well as 110 healthy individuals (74 females and 36 males, with a mean age of 25.57 ± 489 years) as participants were chosen using the convenience sampling method among those who referred to the speech therapy clinics of Tehran, Iran. Research instruments including the repetitive negative thinking inventory, Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale, and Acceptance and Action Questionnaire (AAQ-I) were used for data collection. Data were analyzed using multivariate ANOVA test and Multiple Regression Analysis. Results: The mean age of the participants was 29.55 years in the people who stutter and 25.57 years in the healthy individuals (P < 0.01). The present results indicated that the mean score of experiential avoidance was higher in the people who stutter (M ± SD: 35.74 ± 9.24) compared to the healthy individuals (M ± SD: 8.89 ± 31.11). Additionally, the mean score of emotion regulation difficulties was higher in the people who stutter (M ± SD: 88.75 ± 20.59) compared to the healthy individuals (M ± SD: 64.14 ± 94.94) (P < 0.001). However, there was no significant difference in the mean score of repetitive negative thinking between the people who stutter (M ± SD: 98.45 ± 25.85) and healthy individuals (M ± SD: 93.71 ± 25.24) groups (P > 0.05). There was a significant correlation between experiential avoidance and emotion regulation difficulties in people who stutter (P < 0.01). Experiential avoidance and repetitive negative thinking can significantly predict emotion regulation difficulties in people who stutter (R = 0.65, P < 0.01). Conclusion: People who stutter obtained higher emotion regulation difficulties and experiential avoidance scores than those without stuttering and A significant correlation between experiential avoidance and emotion regulation difficulties was found. Future studies should consider the role of emotion regulation difficulties and experiential avoidance in people who stutter.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
成人口吃患者的情绪调节障碍、重复性消极思维和经验回避研究:比较研究
目的:口吃是一种沟通和流畅性障碍,会损害心理和情绪健康。口吃还与特质焦虑和社交焦虑的显著增加有关。有关成人口吃的研究表明了这一现象的性质和影响。此外,这一现象的某些心理方面仍然模糊不清,需要进一步研究。因此,本研究旨在比较口吃患者和健康人的情绪调节困难、重复性消极思维和体验性回避。研究方法本研究采用方便抽样法,从伊朗德黑兰言语治疗诊所转诊的患者中选取 101 名口吃患者(43 名女性和 58 名男性,平均年龄为 29.55 ± 187 岁)和 110 名健康人(74 名女性和 36 名男性,平均年龄为 25.57 ± 489 岁)作为研究对象。数据收集采用的研究工具包括重复性消极思维量表、情绪调节困难量表和接受与行动问卷(AAQ-I)。数据分析采用多元方差分析和多元回归分析。结果口吃患者的平均年龄为 29.55 岁,健康人的平均年龄为 25.57 岁(P < 0.01)。结果显示,口吃患者的体验回避平均得分(中位数±标准差:35.74 ± 9.24)高于健康人(中位数±标准差:8.89 ± 31.11)。此外,口吃患者的情绪调节困难平均得分(中位数±标准差:88.75±20.59)高于健康人(中位数±标准差:64.14±94.94)(P < 0.001)。然而,口吃患者(中位数±标准差:98.45±25.85)与健康人(中位数±标准差:93.71±25.24)在重复性消极思维的平均得分上没有明显差异(P > 0.05)。口吃患者的经验回避与情绪调节困难之间存在明显的相关性(P < 0.01)。体验性回避和重复性消极思考可显著预测口吃患者的情绪调节障碍(R = 0.65,P < 0.01)。结论与非口吃患者相比,口吃患者的情绪调节困难和体验性回避得分更高,体验性回避与情绪调节困难之间存在明显的相关性。今后的研究应考虑情绪调节困难和体验性回避在口吃患者中的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Iranian Journal of Psychiatry
Iranian Journal of Psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Comparison of Effectiveness of Attention Process Training (APT) with Parenting Management Training (PMT) in Reducing Symptoms of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. An Increased Need to Identify Protective Factors for Sexual Assault. Application of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) in Children and Adolescents Psychotherapy: An Umbrella Review. Investigating Cortical Complexity in Mixed Dementia through Nonlinear Dynamic Analyses: A Resting-State EEG Study. Psychometric Properties of a Persian Version of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) in Iranian Soldiers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1