Psychometric Evaluation of a Persian Version of Beliefs about Emotions Scale in Community and Clinical Samples

Ala Ghapanchi, Imaneh Abasi, Katharine A. Rimes, Maryam Bitarafan, Hamid Zarabi, Fatemeh Sara Derakhshan, M. Derakhshan, Sepideh Ghanadanzadeh, Helena Whitley, Alireza Shamsi
{"title":"Psychometric Evaluation of a Persian Version of Beliefs about Emotions Scale in Community and Clinical Samples","authors":"Ala Ghapanchi, Imaneh Abasi, Katharine A. Rimes, Maryam Bitarafan, Hamid Zarabi, Fatemeh Sara Derakhshan, M. Derakhshan, Sepideh Ghanadanzadeh, Helena Whitley, Alireza Shamsi","doi":"10.18502/ijps.v19i1.14343","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This research is primarily conducted to determine the psychometric properties of the Beliefs about Emotions Scale (BES) in community and clinical samples. The BES is a scale measure used for evaluating individuals’ beliefs in terms of how acceptable it is for them to experience and express their emotions. \nMethod: This study was conducted on two separate samples. In the first part, 300 individuals were selected from a general sample in Tehran using the quota sampling method. For the second part of the study, we used purposive sampling to gather data from 119 patients suffering from Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and 121 patients from Somatic Symptoms Disorder (SSD), whose disorders were diagnosed based on the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria. The BES structural validity was examined through Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Additionally, test-retest composite and internal consistency indices were explored to investigate the reliability of the BES score. Finally, the associations of the BES score with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Young Schema Questionnaire (YSQ), Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (MPS), Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS), and Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) scores were highlighted to investigate the discriminant and convergent validity of the BES score. \nResults: According to CFAs, the one-factor model for the BES demonstrated a good fit with the data collected from both the clinical and community samples. The internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) was satisfactory in the community sample (α = 0.84) and the clinical samples of SSD (α = 0.86) and MDD (α = 0.83). The community sample demonstrated high overall test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.93, P < 0.001; 95% CI: 0.89 - 0.95). In terms of convergent validity, the findings confirmed that in the MMD sample, there was a significant relationship between the BES and almost all measures (including Depression (r = 0.39, P < 0.01), Anxiety (r = 0.21, P < 0.05), Self-Sacrifice (r = 0.27, P < 0.01), MPS-total score (r = 0.22, P < 0.05), DERS total score (r = 0.50, P < 0.01), and Suppression (r = 0.38, P < 0.01). However, in the SSD group, this finding was not found. \nConclusion: The results demonstrated that the Persian BES is a reliable and valid scale of maladaptive beliefs about emotions which could be implemented for both clinical and research aims. \n ","PeriodicalId":38866,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"98 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijps.v19i1.14343","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: This research is primarily conducted to determine the psychometric properties of the Beliefs about Emotions Scale (BES) in community and clinical samples. The BES is a scale measure used for evaluating individuals’ beliefs in terms of how acceptable it is for them to experience and express their emotions. Method: This study was conducted on two separate samples. In the first part, 300 individuals were selected from a general sample in Tehran using the quota sampling method. For the second part of the study, we used purposive sampling to gather data from 119 patients suffering from Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) and 121 patients from Somatic Symptoms Disorder (SSD), whose disorders were diagnosed based on the DSM-5 diagnostic criteria. The BES structural validity was examined through Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). Additionally, test-retest composite and internal consistency indices were explored to investigate the reliability of the BES score. Finally, the associations of the BES score with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Young Schema Questionnaire (YSQ), Multidimensional Perfectionism Scale (MPS), Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale (DERS), and Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (ERQ) scores were highlighted to investigate the discriminant and convergent validity of the BES score. Results: According to CFAs, the one-factor model for the BES demonstrated a good fit with the data collected from both the clinical and community samples. The internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) was satisfactory in the community sample (α = 0.84) and the clinical samples of SSD (α = 0.86) and MDD (α = 0.83). The community sample demonstrated high overall test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.93, P < 0.001; 95% CI: 0.89 - 0.95). In terms of convergent validity, the findings confirmed that in the MMD sample, there was a significant relationship between the BES and almost all measures (including Depression (r = 0.39, P < 0.01), Anxiety (r = 0.21, P < 0.05), Self-Sacrifice (r = 0.27, P < 0.01), MPS-total score (r = 0.22, P < 0.05), DERS total score (r = 0.50, P < 0.01), and Suppression (r = 0.38, P < 0.01). However, in the SSD group, this finding was not found. Conclusion: The results demonstrated that the Persian BES is a reliable and valid scale of maladaptive beliefs about emotions which could be implemented for both clinical and research aims.  
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在社区和临床样本中对波斯语版 "情绪信念量表 "进行心理计量学评估
研究目的本研究的主要目的是确定情绪信念量表(BES)在社区和临床样本中的心理测量特性。BES 是一种量表,用于评估个人对体验和表达情绪的可接受性的信念。研究方法:本研究在两个不同的样本中进行。第一部分,采用配额抽样法从德黑兰的普通样本中抽取了 300 人。在研究的第二部分,我们采用了目的性抽样法,从 119 名重度抑郁障碍(MDD)患者和 121 名躯体症状障碍(SSD)患者中收集数据,这些患者的疾病是根据 DSM-5 诊断标准诊断出来的。通过确证因子分析(CFA)检验了 BES 的结构有效性。此外,还探讨了测试-再测试复合指数和内部一致性指数,以研究 BES 分数的可靠性。最后,研究人员强调了 BES 分数与医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)、青年模式问卷(YSQ)、多维完美主义量表(MPS)、情绪调节困难量表(DERS)和情绪调节问卷(ERQ)分数之间的关联,以探讨 BES 分数的判别效度和收敛效度。结果根据 CFAs,BES 的单因素模型与从临床和社区样本中收集的数据均表现出良好的拟合性。社区样本(α = 0.84)以及 SSD(α = 0.86)和 MDD(α = 0.83)临床样本的内部一致性(Cronbach's alpha)令人满意。社区样本显示出较高的总体测试-重复测试可靠性(ICC = 0.93,P < 0.001;95% CI:0.89 - 0.95)。在收敛效度方面,研究结果证实,在 MMD 样本中,BES 与几乎所有测量指标(包括抑郁(r = 0.39,P < 0.01)、焦虑(r = 0.21,P < 0.05)、自我牺牲(r = 0.27,P < 0.01)、MPS 总分(r = 0.22,P < 0.05)、DERS 总分(r = 0.50,P < 0.01)和压抑(r = 0.38,P < 0.01)。然而,在 SSD 组中却没有发现这一结果。结论研究结果表明,波斯语 BES 是一种可靠、有效的情绪适应不良信念量表,可用于临床和研究目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Iranian Journal of Psychiatry
Iranian Journal of Psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Comparison of Effectiveness of Attention Process Training (APT) with Parenting Management Training (PMT) in Reducing Symptoms of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. An Increased Need to Identify Protective Factors for Sexual Assault. Application of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) in Children and Adolescents Psychotherapy: An Umbrella Review. Investigating Cortical Complexity in Mixed Dementia through Nonlinear Dynamic Analyses: A Resting-State EEG Study. Psychometric Properties of a Persian Version of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) in Iranian Soldiers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1