A Network Analysis Study to Evaluate Obsessive-Compulsive Beliefs/Dimensions and Personality Beliefs in Patients with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD): A Cross-Sectional Study in Two Common OCD Subtypes

Mohammadreza Davoudi, A. Pourshahbaz, B. Dolatshahi, A. Astaneh
{"title":"A Network Analysis Study to Evaluate Obsessive-Compulsive Beliefs/Dimensions and Personality Beliefs in Patients with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD): A Cross-Sectional Study in Two Common OCD Subtypes","authors":"Mohammadreza Davoudi, A. Pourshahbaz, B. Dolatshahi, A. Astaneh","doi":"10.18502/ijps.v19i1.14337","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"  \nObjective: Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) has been considered a heterogeneous psychiatric disorder. Identifying this heterogeneity can lead to better diagnosis and treatment. The two most common OCD subtypes include contamination/cleaning and danger/checking. This study aimed to identify the network structure of OCD symptoms, personality, and obsessive beliefs in these OCD subtypes. \nMethod: 333 patients with OCD were included in the study (156 patients with the danger/check subtype and 177 patients with the contamination/cleaning subtype). In addition, 276 healthy individuals participated in this study. We used a network analysis approach to determine the OCD central symptoms [nodes]. The Personality Beliefs Questionnaire-Short Form [PBQ-SF], Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised [OCI-R], and Obsessional Beliefs Questionnaire-44 [OBQ-44] were used for network estimation. \nResults: The results indicated that the network structure in healthy individuals was different from the network structure in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder [PwOCD]. In healthy individuals, \"obsessive” personality belief and “danger” obsessive belief were the most strength nodes and formed the core of the central communication between symptoms in these subjects. Regarding the contamination/cleaning subtype, the most central symptoms include \"washing\" obsessive symptom, “danger” obsessive belief, and \"wash\" obsessive symptom. However, \"perfect\" obsessive beliefs, \"check\" obsessive symptoms, and “avoidant” personality beliefs were the most central symptoms in the danger/check subtype. These results demonstrated that each of the studied groups had a unique network structure, which is consistent with the heterogeneous nature of OCD. \nConclusion: Different OCD subtypes have different cognitive-behavioral network structures. According to the results of this study, these symptoms should be given priority in OCD theoretical models and treatment strategies.","PeriodicalId":38866,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Psychiatry","volume":"125 ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/ijps.v19i1.14337","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

  Objective: Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD) has been considered a heterogeneous psychiatric disorder. Identifying this heterogeneity can lead to better diagnosis and treatment. The two most common OCD subtypes include contamination/cleaning and danger/checking. This study aimed to identify the network structure of OCD symptoms, personality, and obsessive beliefs in these OCD subtypes. Method: 333 patients with OCD were included in the study (156 patients with the danger/check subtype and 177 patients with the contamination/cleaning subtype). In addition, 276 healthy individuals participated in this study. We used a network analysis approach to determine the OCD central symptoms [nodes]. The Personality Beliefs Questionnaire-Short Form [PBQ-SF], Obsessive-Compulsive Inventory-Revised [OCI-R], and Obsessional Beliefs Questionnaire-44 [OBQ-44] were used for network estimation. Results: The results indicated that the network structure in healthy individuals was different from the network structure in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder [PwOCD]. In healthy individuals, "obsessive” personality belief and “danger” obsessive belief were the most strength nodes and formed the core of the central communication between symptoms in these subjects. Regarding the contamination/cleaning subtype, the most central symptoms include "washing" obsessive symptom, “danger” obsessive belief, and "wash" obsessive symptom. However, "perfect" obsessive beliefs, "check" obsessive symptoms, and “avoidant” personality beliefs were the most central symptoms in the danger/check subtype. These results demonstrated that each of the studied groups had a unique network structure, which is consistent with the heterogeneous nature of OCD. Conclusion: Different OCD subtypes have different cognitive-behavioral network structures. According to the results of this study, these symptoms should be given priority in OCD theoretical models and treatment strategies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估强迫症(OCD)患者的强迫观念/维度和人格信念的网络分析研究:两种常见强迫症亚型的横断面研究
目的:强迫症(OCD)一直被认为是一种异质性精神障碍。识别这种异质性有助于更好地诊断和治疗。强迫症最常见的两种亚型包括污染/清洁型和危险/检查型。本研究旨在确定这些强迫症亚型中强迫症症状、人格和强迫观念的网络结构。研究方法研究共纳入了 333 名强迫症患者(156 名危险/检查亚型患者和 177 名污染/清洁亚型患者)。此外,还有 276 名健康人参与了这项研究。我们采用网络分析方法来确定强迫症的中心症状[节点]。人格信念问卷-简表[PBQ-SF]、强迫症清单-修订版[OCI-R]和强迫症信念问卷-44[OBQ-44]被用于网络估算。结果显示结果表明,健康人的网络结构与强迫症患者的网络结构不同。在健康人中,"强迫 "人格信念和 "危险 "强迫信念是强度最大的节点,是这些受试者症状间中心交流的核心。在污染/清洁亚型中,最核心的症状包括 "清洗 "强迫症状、"危险 "强迫观念和 "清洗 "强迫症状。然而,在危险/检查亚型中,"完美 "强迫信念、"检查 "强迫症状和 "回避 "人格信念是最核心的症状。这些结果表明,每个研究小组都有独特的网络结构,这与强迫症的异质性是一致的。结论不同的强迫症亚型具有不同的认知-行为网络结构。根据本研究的结果,强迫症理论模型和治疗策略应优先考虑这些症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Iranian Journal of Psychiatry
Iranian Journal of Psychiatry Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
42
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
A Comparison of Effectiveness of Attention Process Training (APT) with Parenting Management Training (PMT) in Reducing Symptoms of Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder. An Increased Need to Identify Protective Factors for Sexual Assault. Application of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) in Children and Adolescents Psychotherapy: An Umbrella Review. Investigating Cortical Complexity in Mixed Dementia through Nonlinear Dynamic Analyses: A Resting-State EEG Study. Psychometric Properties of a Persian Version of the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) in Iranian Soldiers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1