Utility of beta-lactam allergy assessment in patients receiving vancomycin for surgical prophylaxis

IF 0.6 Q4 SURGERY Surgery in practice and science Pub Date : 2023-12-21 DOI:10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100232
Kendall J. Tucker , YoungYoon Ham , Haley K. Holmer , Caitlin M. McCracken , Ellie Sukerman , James S. Lewis II , Jessina C. McGregor
{"title":"Utility of beta-lactam allergy assessment in patients receiving vancomycin for surgical prophylaxis","authors":"Kendall J. Tucker ,&nbsp;YoungYoon Ham ,&nbsp;Haley K. Holmer ,&nbsp;Caitlin M. McCracken ,&nbsp;Ellie Sukerman ,&nbsp;James S. Lewis II ,&nbsp;Jessina C. McGregor","doi":"10.1016/j.sipas.2023.100232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Beta-lactam antibiotics are first-line agents for most patients receiving antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgical procedures. Despite evidence showing low cross-reactivity between penicillins and cephalosporins, patients with beta-lactam allergies commonly receive vancomycin as an alternative to avoid allergic reaction.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Adult patients receiving vancomycin for surgical prophylaxis with a reported beta-lactam allergy at our institution between August 2017 to July 2018 were retrospectively evaluated for potential eligibility for penicillin allergy testing and/or receipt of standard prophylaxis.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Among 830 patients who received vancomycin for surgical prophylaxis, 196 reported beta-lactam allergy and were included in the analysis. Approximately 40 % of surgeries were orthopedic. Of patients receiving vancomycin as first-line therapy, 189 (96.4 %) were potentially eligible for beta-lactam prophylaxis.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Patients with beta-lactam allergies often qualify for receipt of a first-line antibiotic. An opportunity exists for improved allergy assessment as an antimicrobial stewardship intervention in surgical prophylaxis.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74890,"journal":{"name":"Surgery in practice and science","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100232"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262023000785/pdfft?md5=fb046a43043ffa7cf9a67c0f9f7597da&pid=1-s2.0-S2666262023000785-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgery in practice and science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666262023000785","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Beta-lactam antibiotics are first-line agents for most patients receiving antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgical procedures. Despite evidence showing low cross-reactivity between penicillins and cephalosporins, patients with beta-lactam allergies commonly receive vancomycin as an alternative to avoid allergic reaction.

Methods

Adult patients receiving vancomycin for surgical prophylaxis with a reported beta-lactam allergy at our institution between August 2017 to July 2018 were retrospectively evaluated for potential eligibility for penicillin allergy testing and/or receipt of standard prophylaxis.

Results

Among 830 patients who received vancomycin for surgical prophylaxis, 196 reported beta-lactam allergy and were included in the analysis. Approximately 40 % of surgeries were orthopedic. Of patients receiving vancomycin as first-line therapy, 189 (96.4 %) were potentially eligible for beta-lactam prophylaxis.

Conclusions

Patients with beta-lactam allergies often qualify for receipt of a first-line antibiotic. An opportunity exists for improved allergy assessment as an antimicrobial stewardship intervention in surgical prophylaxis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对接受万古霉素手术预防的患者进行β-内酰胺过敏评估的实用性
背景β-内酰胺类抗生素是大多数接受外科手术抗菌预防的患者的一线用药。尽管有证据显示青霉素类和头孢菌素类之间的交叉反应较低,但对β-内酰胺过敏的患者通常会选择万古霉素来避免过敏反应。方法回顾性评估我院2017年8月至2018年7月期间接受万古霉素手术预防且报告对β-内酰胺过敏的成人患者,以确定其是否有资格接受青霉素过敏检测和/或接受标准预防。约 40% 的手术为骨科手术。在接受万古霉素一线治疗的患者中,有 189 人(96.4%)可能符合接受β-内酰胺预防治疗的条件。有机会改进过敏评估,将其作为手术预防中的抗菌药物管理干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
38 days
期刊最新文献
Surgical sharp debridement alongside maggot debridement therapy (MDT) for the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs): A systematic review of case reports. Is there an impact of surgeon's experience on in-hospital outcome in patients with operatively treated proximal humerus and humerus shaft fractures? The CRP/PAB ratio outperforms the LRINEC score in early diagnosis of Fournier's gangrene. Operating room times differ for surgical fixation of metacarpal fractures: An analysis of two principally different techniques. Higher compliance with the enhanced recovery after surgery protocol improves postoperative recovery and 6-month mortality in upper gastrointestinal surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1