The visibility of research within mandatory National Health Service Trust Induction programmes in England: an exploratory survey study.

IF 1.6 Q2 NURSING Journal of Research in Nursing Pub Date : 2023-11-01 Epub Date: 2023-11-28 DOI:10.1177/17449871231205816
Julie Menzies, Sharon Grieve, Lucy Ainsworth, Victoria Sharman, Vikki Smith, Catherine Henshall
{"title":"The visibility of research within mandatory National Health Service Trust Induction programmes in England: an exploratory survey study.","authors":"Julie Menzies, Sharon Grieve, Lucy Ainsworth, Victoria Sharman, Vikki Smith, Catherine Henshall","doi":"10.1177/17449871231205816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mandatory NHS Trust induction programmes are an integral part of staff orientation processes. Although research is recognised as fundamental to high-quality care, little data exist regarding whether research information is included within hospital induction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two online national surveys were developed, with the aim of identifying Trusts which included research within their mandatory induction programme. Survey 1 was distributed to Research and Development managers across England (<i>n</i> = 201). Survey 2 collated information on the research content and delivery methods of induction material. The work was classified as a service evaluation and reported in accordance with CHERRIES reporting standards.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Survey 1 generated 124 unique responses (61% response rate). Thirty-nine percent of Trusts (<i>n</i> = 48) featured information about research delivery and 24% (<i>n</i> = 30) about training or support to develop clinical academic careers. There was wide variation in how materials were delivered, by whom and for how long.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Currently research has a limited profile within English NHS Trust mandatory induction programmes. This needs to be addressed if research is truly to be considered part of the core National Health Service business. Guidance or a modifiable template could help Trusts communicate about research delivery and clinical academic development and training to all new employees.</p>","PeriodicalId":47172,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research in Nursing","volume":"28 6-7","pages":"545-557"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10741262/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17449871231205816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/11/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mandatory NHS Trust induction programmes are an integral part of staff orientation processes. Although research is recognised as fundamental to high-quality care, little data exist regarding whether research information is included within hospital induction.

Methods: Two online national surveys were developed, with the aim of identifying Trusts which included research within their mandatory induction programme. Survey 1 was distributed to Research and Development managers across England (n = 201). Survey 2 collated information on the research content and delivery methods of induction material. The work was classified as a service evaluation and reported in accordance with CHERRIES reporting standards.

Results: Survey 1 generated 124 unique responses (61% response rate). Thirty-nine percent of Trusts (n = 48) featured information about research delivery and 24% (n = 30) about training or support to develop clinical academic careers. There was wide variation in how materials were delivered, by whom and for how long.

Conclusions: Currently research has a limited profile within English NHS Trust mandatory induction programmes. This needs to be addressed if research is truly to be considered part of the core National Health Service business. Guidance or a modifiable template could help Trusts communicate about research delivery and clinical academic development and training to all new employees.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究在英格兰国家卫生服务信托公司强制性上岗培训计划中的能见度:一项探索性调查研究。
背景:国家医疗服务系统信托公司的强制性入职培训计划是员工入职培训过程中不可或缺的一部分。尽管研究被认为是高质量护理的基础,但有关医院入职培训中是否包含研究信息的数据却很少:方法:我们开发了两项在线全国调查,旨在确定哪些信托机构在其强制性入职培训计划中包含了研究内容。调查 1 分发给全英格兰的研究与发展管理人员(n = 201)。调查 2 收集整理了有关入职材料的研究内容和交付方法的信息。这项工作被归类为服务评估,并按照 CHERRIES 报告标准进行报告:调查 1 共收到 124 份回复(回复率为 61%)。39%的托管机构(n = 48)提供了有关研究工作的信息,24%的托管机构(n = 30)提供了有关临床学术职业发展的培训或支持信息。在如何提供资料、由谁提供以及提供多长时间等方面存在很大差异:目前,研究工作在英国国家医疗服务系统信托公司的强制性入职培训计划中的地位有限。如果要真正将研究视为国家医疗服务核心业务的一部分,就必须解决这一问题。指南或可修改的模板可帮助信托机构向所有新员工宣传研究交付、临床学术发展和培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
3.20%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: The Journal of Research in Nursing is a leading peer reviewed journal that blends good research with contemporary debates about policy and practice. The Journal of Research in Nursing contributes knowledge to nursing practice, research and local, national and international health and social care policy. Each issue contains a variety of papers and review commentaries within a specific theme. The editors are advised and supported by a board of key academics, practitioners and policy makers of international standing. The Journal of Research in Nursing will: • Ensure an evidence base to your practice and policy development • Inform your research work at an advanced level • Challenge you to critically reflect on the interface between practice, policy and research
期刊最新文献
Commentary: Nurses' attitudes towards safety and their association with nurses' perceptions of adverse events and quality of care: a cross-sectional study. Commentary: Relationship between resilience, social support and psychological well-being in nursing students. Nurses' attitudes towards safety and their association with nurses' perceptions of adverse events and quality of care: a cross-sectional study. Relationship between resilience, social support and psychological well-being in nursing students. Commentary: Conceptualising nursing theory and practice within a local cultural and professional context: a methodological example to inform theory development.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1