Sugar Profile Method by High-Performance Anion-Exchange Chromatography with Pulsed Amperometric Detection in Food, Dietary Supplements, Pet Food, and Animal Feeds: Interlaboratory Validation Study, Final Action 2018.16.

Andrew J Ruosch, David J Ellingson
{"title":"Sugar Profile Method by High-Performance Anion-Exchange Chromatography with Pulsed Amperometric Detection in Food, Dietary Supplements, Pet Food, and Animal Feeds: Interlaboratory Validation Study, Final Action 2018.16.","authors":"Andrew J Ruosch, David J Ellingson","doi":"10.1093/jaoacint/qsad138","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A method for sugar profile analysis granted First Action 2018.16 was subjected to a multi-laboratory study.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>Perform a multi-laboratory study with this method to determine the performance parameters of repeatability and reproducibility against the AOAC Standard Method Performance Requirements (AOAC SMPR 2018.001) for Final Action status.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Eleven laboratories from three different countries participated in the study. Each laboratory was provided practice materials for successful method setup. Each laboratory then proceeded with analysis of blind duplicates of 10 different products covering the scope of the method. Results were reported to the study directors with any modifications and assessed following the procedures of Appendix D of the AOAC Official Methods of AnalysisSM (guidelines for collaborative study procedures).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The majority of results from the study met the SMPR requirements. The data is presented along with any outlying observations or modifications. The method was proven to be flexible across different instrumentation and laboratories, and the method was updated to provide further system suitability and guidelines to maintain the performance of the method across the large scope of matrixes.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The results from the collaborative study supported the method for Final Action status. The Expert Review Panel reviewed and voted to move the method forward to Final Action and was followed by review from the Official Methods Board and granted approval.</p><p><strong>Highlights: </strong>The method was granted Final Action Official Methods status.</p>","PeriodicalId":94064,"journal":{"name":"Journal of AOAC International","volume":" ","pages":"303-319"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of AOAC International","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jaoacint/qsad138","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A method for sugar profile analysis granted First Action 2018.16 was subjected to a multi-laboratory study.

Objective: Perform a multi-laboratory study with this method to determine the performance parameters of repeatability and reproducibility against the AOAC Standard Method Performance Requirements (AOAC SMPR 2018.001) for Final Action status.

Methods: Eleven laboratories from three different countries participated in the study. Each laboratory was provided practice materials for successful method setup. Each laboratory then proceeded with analysis of blind duplicates of 10 different products covering the scope of the method. Results were reported to the study directors with any modifications and assessed following the procedures of Appendix D of the AOAC Official Methods of AnalysisSM (guidelines for collaborative study procedures).

Results: The majority of results from the study met the SMPR requirements. The data is presented along with any outlying observations or modifications. The method was proven to be flexible across different instrumentation and laboratories, and the method was updated to provide further system suitability and guidelines to maintain the performance of the method across the large scope of matrixes.

Conclusion: The results from the collaborative study supported the method for Final Action status. The Expert Review Panel reviewed and voted to move the method forward to Final Action and was followed by review from the Official Methods Board and granted approval.

Highlights: The method was granted Final Action Official Methods status.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
食品、膳食补充剂、宠物食品和动物饲料中的高效阴离子交换色谱法与脉冲安培检测法的糖谱分析方法:实验室间验证研究,最终行动 2018.16。
背景:对获得2018.16号第一个行动批准的糖剖面分析方法进行了多实验室研究:对该方法进行多实验室研究,以确定其重复性和再现性的性能参数是否符合 AOAC 标准方法性能要求(AOAC SMPR 2018.001),从而获得最终行动资格:来自三个不同国家的 11 家实验室参与了这项研究。每个实验室都获得了成功建立方法的练习材料。然后,每个实验室对涵盖方法范围的 10 种不同产品进行盲法重复分析。按照 AOAC 官方分析方法 SM 附录 D 的程序(合作研究程序指南),向研究负责人报告结果及任何修改和评估:结果:大部分研究结果都符合 SMPR 的要求。数据连同任何偏离的观察结果或修改都一并列出。该方法在不同的仪器和实验室中被证明是灵活的,并且该方法已被更新,以提供进一步的系统适用性和指南,从而在大量基质中保持该方法的性能:结论:合作研究的结果支持该方法进入最终行动阶段。专家评审小组审查并投票决定将该方法推进到最终行动阶段,随后由正式方法委员会进行审查并批准:该方法被授予 "最终行动 "正式方法 SM 地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Validation of the QuEChERSER Method for 245 Pesticides and Environmental Contaminants in Barley and Hemp by Low-Pressure GC: Comparison of Triple Quadrupole MS/MS and Orbitrap HRMS for Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis. FraMiTrACR: A Sustainable and Economical Technology for Analytical Sample Preparation. Proof of Concept: Autonomous Machine Vision Software for Botanical Identification. Influence of Talc in Polypropylene on Total Fluorine Measurements Used as an Indicator of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS). Validation of the Level 2 Modification for the Neogen® Molecular Detection Assay 2 - Salmonella Enteritidis/Salmonella Typhimurium Method for Detection of the Monophasic Variant Salmonella enterica  1,4,[5],12:-:1,2.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1