A randomised controlled trial comparing quality of recovery between desflurane and isoflurane inhalation anaesthesia in patients undergoing ophthalmological surgery at a tertiary hospital in South Africa (DIQoR trial)

Charlé Steyl, Hyla-Louise Kluyts
{"title":"A randomised controlled trial comparing quality of recovery between desflurane and isoflurane inhalation anaesthesia in patients undergoing ophthalmological surgery at a tertiary hospital in South Africa (DIQoR trial)","authors":"Charlé Steyl,&nbsp;Hyla-Louise Kluyts","doi":"10.1016/j.bjao.2023.100246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The patient's experience of their postoperative recovery is an important perioperative outcome, with the 15-item quality of recovery scale (QoR-15) recommended as a standardised outcomes measure. Desflurane has a faster emergence from anaesthesia compared with other volatile anaesthetics, but it is uncertain whether this translates to better subjective quality of recovery. The hypothesis for this study is that patients receiving desflurane for maintenance of anaesthesia would have better postoperative quality of recovery than patients receiving isoflurane.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Male and female adult patients undergoing ophthalmological surgery under general anaesthesia were randomly allocated to receive desflurane or isoflurane for maintenance of anaesthesia. The primary outcome was to compare postoperative QoR-15 scores. Secondary outcomes included comparing preoperative QoR-15 scores, volatile agent consumption, and time spent in the recovery room.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Data from 164 patients were analysed (80 desflurane, 84 isoflurane). Median (Q1, Q3) postoperative QoR-15 scores were not significantly different (desflurane: 145 [141, 148], isoflurane: 144 [139, 147], 95% confidence interval 0–3, <em>P</em>=0.176, minimal clinically important difference=8). Median (Q1, Q3) volatile agent consumption was 15.4 (12.5, 19.3) ml hr<sup>−1</sup> in the desflurane group, and 7.4 (5.9, 9.7) ml hr<sup>−1</sup> in the isoflurane group. Median (Q1, Q3) time spent in the recovery room was significantly shorter in the desflurane group (desflurane: 18 [13, 23]; isoflurane: 25 [19, 32], 95% confidence interval −10 to 5, <em>P</em>&lt;0.001).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study found no difference in quality of recovery between patients who received desflurane or isoflurane for maintenance of general anaesthesia during ophthalmological surgery. A shorter time in the recovery room was not associated with improved QoR-15 scores.</p></div><div><h3>Clinical trial registration</h3><p>NCT04188314.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72418,"journal":{"name":"BJA open","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100246"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609623001259/pdfft?md5=6f7fcd5d4c4cfdd7584eeb5ff0b53941&pid=1-s2.0-S2772609623001259-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BJA open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772609623001259","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

The patient's experience of their postoperative recovery is an important perioperative outcome, with the 15-item quality of recovery scale (QoR-15) recommended as a standardised outcomes measure. Desflurane has a faster emergence from anaesthesia compared with other volatile anaesthetics, but it is uncertain whether this translates to better subjective quality of recovery. The hypothesis for this study is that patients receiving desflurane for maintenance of anaesthesia would have better postoperative quality of recovery than patients receiving isoflurane.

Methods

Male and female adult patients undergoing ophthalmological surgery under general anaesthesia were randomly allocated to receive desflurane or isoflurane for maintenance of anaesthesia. The primary outcome was to compare postoperative QoR-15 scores. Secondary outcomes included comparing preoperative QoR-15 scores, volatile agent consumption, and time spent in the recovery room.

Results

Data from 164 patients were analysed (80 desflurane, 84 isoflurane). Median (Q1, Q3) postoperative QoR-15 scores were not significantly different (desflurane: 145 [141, 148], isoflurane: 144 [139, 147], 95% confidence interval 0–3, P=0.176, minimal clinically important difference=8). Median (Q1, Q3) volatile agent consumption was 15.4 (12.5, 19.3) ml hr−1 in the desflurane group, and 7.4 (5.9, 9.7) ml hr−1 in the isoflurane group. Median (Q1, Q3) time spent in the recovery room was significantly shorter in the desflurane group (desflurane: 18 [13, 23]; isoflurane: 25 [19, 32], 95% confidence interval −10 to 5, P<0.001).

Conclusions

This study found no difference in quality of recovery between patients who received desflurane or isoflurane for maintenance of general anaesthesia during ophthalmological surgery. A shorter time in the recovery room was not associated with improved QoR-15 scores.

Clinical trial registration

NCT04188314.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
比较南非一家三级医院眼科手术患者在地氟醚和异氟醚吸入麻醉下恢复质量的随机对照试验(DIQoR 试验)
背景患者对术后恢复的体验是围手术期的一个重要结果,建议将 15 项恢复质量量表(QoR-15)作为标准化的结果衡量标准。与其他挥发性麻醉药相比,地氟醚能更快地从麻醉中苏醒,但目前还不确定这是否会带来更好的主观恢复质量。本研究的假设是,与接受异氟醚麻醉的患者相比,接受地氟醚维持麻醉的患者术后恢复质量会更好。主要结果是比较术后 QoR-15 评分。次要结果包括比较术前 QoR-15 评分、挥发性药物消耗量和在恢复室所花费的时间。结果 分析了 164 名患者的数据(80 名患者使用地氟醚,84 名患者使用异氟醚)。术后 QoR-15 评分中位数(Q1、Q3)无显著差异(地氟醚:145 [141、148],异氟醚:144 [139、147],95% 置信区间 0-3,P=0.176,最小临床重要性差异=8)。地氟醚组挥发性药物消耗量中位数(第一季度、第三季度)为 15.4(12.5,19.3)毫升/小时-1,异氟醚组为 7.4(5.9,9.7)毫升/小时-1。地氟醚组在恢复室所用时间的中位数(Q1,Q3)明显较短(地氟醚:18 [13,23];异氟醚:25 [19,32],95% 置信区间-10 到 5,P<0.001)。临床试验注册号:NCT04188314。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BJA open
BJA open Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
83 days
期刊最新文献
Xenon anaesthesia is associated with a reduction in frontal electroencephalogram peak alpha frequency Moderate or severe pain in recovery after major elective surgery: A pilot retrospective analysis to identify those at risk Association between plasma-free haemoglobin and postoperative acute kidney injury in paediatric cardiac surgery: a prospective observational study Oxygen insufflation via the working channel during tracheal intubation guided by a flexible optical scope and benefits, dangers, and future of the method: a narrative review Incidence and trajectories of subclinical and KDIGO-defined postoperative acute kidney injury in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1