The assessment and communication of genotoxicity test results: moving beyond binary

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Mutation research. Genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.mrgentox.2023.503722
Takashi Omori , Makoto Hayashi
{"title":"The assessment and communication of genotoxicity test results: moving beyond binary","authors":"Takashi Omori ,&nbsp;Makoto Hayashi","doi":"10.1016/j.mrgentox.2023.503722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Potential genotoxicity is one of the essential considerations in the safety assessment of chemicals to which humans may be exposed. Several endpoints are used to evaluate genotoxicity, but, in each case, a binary assessment (negative/positive) is demanded by regulators. The use of binary assessment has rarely been questioned, although we have pointed out some questions and difficulties with regard to the statistical methods used and the evaluation of biological significance, both of which inform the calls of negative/ positive. Here, we discuss these issues further, focusing on ambiguity and uncertainty in the binary paradigm, and we seek a new direction for genotoxicity assessment. To this end, we need to understand, acknowledge, and accept these ambiguities and study-related uncertainties and then to consider new strategies for safety assessment. We also discuss the communication of ambiguity and uncertainty in risk communication.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18799,"journal":{"name":"Mutation research. Genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis","volume":"893 ","pages":"Article 503722"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mutation research. Genetic toxicology and environmental mutagenesis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1383571823001407","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Potential genotoxicity is one of the essential considerations in the safety assessment of chemicals to which humans may be exposed. Several endpoints are used to evaluate genotoxicity, but, in each case, a binary assessment (negative/positive) is demanded by regulators. The use of binary assessment has rarely been questioned, although we have pointed out some questions and difficulties with regard to the statistical methods used and the evaluation of biological significance, both of which inform the calls of negative/ positive. Here, we discuss these issues further, focusing on ambiguity and uncertainty in the binary paradigm, and we seek a new direction for genotoxicity assessment. To this end, we need to understand, acknowledge, and accept these ambiguities and study-related uncertainties and then to consider new strategies for safety assessment. We also discuss the communication of ambiguity and uncertainty in risk communication.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
遗传毒性测试结果的评估与交流:超越二元对立
在对人类可能接触的化学品进行安全评估时,潜在的遗传毒性是基本考虑因素之一。有几种终点可用于评估基因毒性,但在每种情况下,监管机构都要求进行二元评估(阴性/阳性)。二元评估的使用很少受到质疑,尽管我们已经指出了所使用的统计方法和生物重要性评估方面的一些问题和困难,这两方面都是判定阴性/阳性的依据。在此,我们将进一步讨论这些问题,重点关注二元模式中的模糊性和不确定性,并寻求遗传毒性评估的新方向。为此,我们需要理解、承认并接受这些模糊性和与研究相关的不确定性,然后考虑新的安全评估策略。我们还讨论了风险交流中模糊性和不确定性的交流问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
5.30%
发文量
84
审稿时长
105 days
期刊介绍: Mutation Research - Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis (MRGTEM) publishes papers advancing knowledge in the field of genetic toxicology. Papers are welcomed in the following areas: New developments in genotoxicity testing of chemical agents (e.g. improvements in methodology of assay systems and interpretation of results). Alternatives to and refinement of the use of animals in genotoxicity testing. Nano-genotoxicology, the study of genotoxicity hazards and risks related to novel man-made nanomaterials. Studies of epigenetic changes in relation to genotoxic effects. The use of structure-activity relationships in predicting genotoxic effects. The isolation and chemical characterization of novel environmental mutagens. The measurement of genotoxic effects in human populations, when accompanied by quantitative measurements of environmental or occupational exposures. The application of novel technologies for assessing the hazard and risks associated with genotoxic substances (e.g. OMICS or other high-throughput approaches to genotoxicity testing). MRGTEM is now accepting submissions for a new section of the journal: Current Topics in Genotoxicity Testing, that will be dedicated to the discussion of current issues relating to design, interpretation and strategic use of genotoxicity tests. This section is envisaged to include discussions relating to the development of new international testing guidelines, but also to wider topics in the field. The evaluation of contrasting or opposing viewpoints is welcomed as long as the presentation is in accordance with the journal''s aims, scope, and policies.
期刊最新文献
Introduction Investigation of genetic instability in patients with Diabetes Mellitus type I, II and LADA using buccal micronucleus cytome assay Genotoxicity analysis of a flame retardant, aluminum diethylphosphinate In vitro hepatic 3D cell models and their application in genetic toxicology: A systematic review Disperse Red 1 azo dye: Consequences of low-dose/low-concentration exposures in mice and zebrafish
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1