A survey of screening and support systems for socially high-risk pregnancies at obstetric facilities in Japan

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Japan Journal of Nursing Science Pub Date : 2023-12-25 DOI:10.1111/jjns.12581
Kumiko Otsuka, Aiko Okatsu, Satoko Wada, Nobuaki Mitsuda, Yaeko Kataoka
{"title":"A survey of screening and support systems for socially high-risk pregnancies at obstetric facilities in Japan","authors":"Kumiko Otsuka,&nbsp;Aiko Okatsu,&nbsp;Satoko Wada,&nbsp;Nobuaki Mitsuda,&nbsp;Yaeko Kataoka","doi":"10.1111/jjns.12581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Aim</h3>\n \n <p>To clarify the state of screening and support systems for socially high-risk pregnant women at obstetric facilities across Japan and identify the characteristics of facilities related to the implementation of screening.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This cross-sectional study used a self-administered questionnaire. Participants were managers of hospitals, clinics, and midwifery birth centers handling deliveries in 47 prefectures across Japan. The questionnaire comprised items regarding the characteristics of participants and their facilities, service provision related to socially high-risk women available at the facility, the number of specified pregnant women (<i>tokutei ninpu</i>) per year, methods of screening, and support systems within the obstetric facilities. Descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed using IBM-SPSS version 24 for the association between facility characteristics and screening practices for socially high-risk pregnant women.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Valid responses were received from 716 of 2512 obstetric facilities. Rates of specified expectant mothers per annual number of deliveries were identified as follows: perinatal medical centers (2.7%), general hospitals (1.6%), obstetrics and gynecology hospitals (1.0%), and clinics (0.8%). A total of 426 facilities (60.6%) reported screening all expectant mothers to identify socially high-risk pregnant women. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that facility characteristics and service/care provision related to screening practices included availability of in-hospital midwife-led care and in-hospital midwifery clinics (adjusted odds ratio 1.61; 95% CI [1.30, 1.47]), one-on-one care by midwife (1.73; 95% CI [1.15, 2.59]), multidisciplinary meetings within the facility (1.70; 95% CI [1.14, 2.56]), follow-up support systems after discharge (1.90; 95% CI [1.17, 3.09]), and participation in the regional council for children in need of protection (2.33; 95% CI [1.13, 4.81]).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Approximately 60% of surveyed obstetric facilities screen for socially high-risk women. Increasing service provision at facilities may be necessary to implement screening.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":50265,"journal":{"name":"Japan Journal of Nursing Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japan Journal of Nursing Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jjns.12581","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

To clarify the state of screening and support systems for socially high-risk pregnant women at obstetric facilities across Japan and identify the characteristics of facilities related to the implementation of screening.

Methods

This cross-sectional study used a self-administered questionnaire. Participants were managers of hospitals, clinics, and midwifery birth centers handling deliveries in 47 prefectures across Japan. The questionnaire comprised items regarding the characteristics of participants and their facilities, service provision related to socially high-risk women available at the facility, the number of specified pregnant women (tokutei ninpu) per year, methods of screening, and support systems within the obstetric facilities. Descriptive statistics and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed using IBM-SPSS version 24 for the association between facility characteristics and screening practices for socially high-risk pregnant women.

Results

Valid responses were received from 716 of 2512 obstetric facilities. Rates of specified expectant mothers per annual number of deliveries were identified as follows: perinatal medical centers (2.7%), general hospitals (1.6%), obstetrics and gynecology hospitals (1.0%), and clinics (0.8%). A total of 426 facilities (60.6%) reported screening all expectant mothers to identify socially high-risk pregnant women. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that facility characteristics and service/care provision related to screening practices included availability of in-hospital midwife-led care and in-hospital midwifery clinics (adjusted odds ratio 1.61; 95% CI [1.30, 1.47]), one-on-one care by midwife (1.73; 95% CI [1.15, 2.59]), multidisciplinary meetings within the facility (1.70; 95% CI [1.14, 2.56]), follow-up support systems after discharge (1.90; 95% CI [1.17, 3.09]), and participation in the regional council for children in need of protection (2.33; 95% CI [1.13, 4.81]).

Conclusions

Approximately 60% of surveyed obstetric facilities screen for socially high-risk women. Increasing service provision at facilities may be necessary to implement screening.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
日本产科机构社会高危妊娠筛查和支持系统调查。
目的:了解日本各地产科机构为社会高危孕妇提供筛查和支持系统的情况,并确定与实施筛查有关的产科机构的特点:这项横断面研究采用了自填式问卷。调查对象为日本 47 个都道府县的医院、诊所和助产分娩中心的管理人员。调查问卷的项目包括:参与者及其机构的特征、机构为社会高危妇女提供的服务、每年特定孕妇(tokutei ninpu)的数量、筛查方法以及产科机构内部的支持系统。使用 IBM-SPSS 第 24 版进行了描述性统计和多变量逻辑回归分析,以研究机构特征与社会高危孕妇筛查方法之间的关联:在 2512 家产科机构中,有 716 家做出了有效回复。每年度分娩数量中特定孕妇的比率如下:围产期医疗中心(2.7%)、综合医院(1.6%)、妇产科医院(1.0%)和诊所(0.8%)。共有 426 家机构(60.6%)报告对所有孕妇进行筛查,以识别社会高危孕妇。多元逻辑回归分析表明,与筛查实践相关的设施特征和服务/护理提供包括院内助产士主导的护理和院内助产诊所(调整后的几率比 1.61;95% CI [1.30,1.47])、助产士一对一护理(1.73;95% CI [1.15,2.59])、机构内的多学科会议(1.70;95% CI [1.14,2.56])、出院后的后续支持系统(1.90;95% CI [1.17,3.09])以及参与需要保护儿童的地区委员会(2.33;95% CI [1.13,4.81]):在接受调查的产科机构中,约有 60% 的机构对社会高危妇女进行筛查。要实施筛查,可能需要增加产科机构提供的服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
55
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Japan Journal of Nursing Science is the official English language journal of the Japan Academy of Nursing Science. The purpose of the Journal is to provide a mechanism to share knowledge related to improving health care and promoting the development of nursing. The Journal seeks original manuscripts reporting scholarly work on the art and science of nursing. Original articles may be empirical and qualitative studies, review articles, methodological articles, brief reports, case studies and letters to the Editor. Please see Instructions for Authors for detailed authorship qualification requirement.
期刊最新文献
Rural women's voices revealing perceptions about decisions on where to give birth in Gabon: A qualitative study Association of psychosocial factors at work with fertility and menstrual disorders: A systematic review Evaluation of the performance of nursing students taught using online and offline learning models in emergency and critical care nursing during the COVID-19 pandemic The role of family support in medication adherence and quality of life among tuberculosis patients: A scoping review Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1