Clinical and functional effects of beta-blocker therapy discontinuation in patients with biventricular heart failure.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine Pub Date : 2024-02-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-22 DOI:10.2459/JCM.0000000000001571
Massimo Slavich, Gianluca Ricchetti, Barbara Demarchi, Giulio Cavalli, Roberto Spoladore, Anna Federico, Francesco Federico, Carolina Bezzi, Alberto Margonato, Gabriele Fragasso
{"title":"Clinical and functional effects of beta-blocker therapy discontinuation in patients with biventricular heart failure.","authors":"Massimo Slavich, Gianluca Ricchetti, Barbara Demarchi, Giulio Cavalli, Roberto Spoladore, Anna Federico, Francesco Federico, Carolina Bezzi, Alberto Margonato, Gabriele Fragasso","doi":"10.2459/JCM.0000000000001571","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Nearly two-thirds of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) have right ventricular dysfunction, previously identified as an independent predictor of reduced functional capacity and poor prognosis. Beta-blocker therapy (β-BT) reduces mortality and hospitalizations in patients with HFrEF and is approved as first-line therapy regardless of concomitant right ventricular function. However, the exact role of sympathetic nervous system activation in right ventricular dysfunction and the potential usefulness (or harmfulness) of β-BT in these patients are still unclear.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The aim of the study is to evaluate the medium-term effect of β-BT discontinuation on functional capacity and right ventricular remodelling based on cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), echocardiography and serum biomarkers in patients with clinically stable biventricular dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this single-centre, open-label, prospective trial, 16 patients were enrolled using the following criteria: patients were clinically stable without signs of peripheral congestion; NYHA II-III while on optimal medical therapy (including β-BT); LVEF 40% or less; echocardiographic criteria of right ventricular dysfunction. Patients were randomized 1 : 1 either to withdraw (group 0) or continue (group 1) β-BT. In group 0, optimal heart rate was obtained with alternative rate-control drugs. Echo and serum biomarkers were performed at baseline, after 3 and 6 months; CPET was performed at baseline and 6 months. Mann--Whitney U test was adopted to determine the relationships between β-BT discontinuation and effects on right ventricular dysfunction.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>At 6 months' follow up, S' DTI improved (ΔS': 1.01 vs. -0.92 cm/s; P = 0.03), while estimated PAPs (ΔPAPs: 0.8 vs. -7.5 mmHg; P = 0.04) and echo left ventricular-remodelling (ΔEDVi: 19.55 vs. -0.96 ml/mq; P = 0.03) worsened in group 0. In absolute terms, the only variables significantly affected by β-BT withdrawal were left ventricular EDV and ESV, appearing worse in group 0 (mean EDVi 115 vs. 84 ml/mq; mean ESVi 79 vs. 53.9 ml/mq, P = 0.03). No significant changes in terms of functional capacity were observed after β-BT withdrawal.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In HFrEF patients with concomitant right ventricular dysfunction, β-BT discontinuation did not produce any beneficial effects. In addition, despite maintenance of optimal heart rate control, β-BT discontinuation induced worsening of left ventricular remodelling. Our study corroborates the hypothesis that improvement in left ventricular function may likewise be a major determinant for improvement in right ventricular function, reducing pulmonary wedge pressure and right ventricular afterload, with only a marginal action of its negative inotropic effect. In conclusion, β-BT appears beneficial also in heart failure patients with biventricular dysfunction.</p>","PeriodicalId":15228,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2459/JCM.0000000000001571","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Nearly two-thirds of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) have right ventricular dysfunction, previously identified as an independent predictor of reduced functional capacity and poor prognosis. Beta-blocker therapy (β-BT) reduces mortality and hospitalizations in patients with HFrEF and is approved as first-line therapy regardless of concomitant right ventricular function. However, the exact role of sympathetic nervous system activation in right ventricular dysfunction and the potential usefulness (or harmfulness) of β-BT in these patients are still unclear.

Objectives: The aim of the study is to evaluate the medium-term effect of β-BT discontinuation on functional capacity and right ventricular remodelling based on cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), echocardiography and serum biomarkers in patients with clinically stable biventricular dysfunction.

Methods: In this single-centre, open-label, prospective trial, 16 patients were enrolled using the following criteria: patients were clinically stable without signs of peripheral congestion; NYHA II-III while on optimal medical therapy (including β-BT); LVEF 40% or less; echocardiographic criteria of right ventricular dysfunction. Patients were randomized 1 : 1 either to withdraw (group 0) or continue (group 1) β-BT. In group 0, optimal heart rate was obtained with alternative rate-control drugs. Echo and serum biomarkers were performed at baseline, after 3 and 6 months; CPET was performed at baseline and 6 months. Mann--Whitney U test was adopted to determine the relationships between β-BT discontinuation and effects on right ventricular dysfunction.

Results: At 6 months' follow up, S' DTI improved (ΔS': 1.01 vs. -0.92 cm/s; P = 0.03), while estimated PAPs (ΔPAPs: 0.8 vs. -7.5 mmHg; P = 0.04) and echo left ventricular-remodelling (ΔEDVi: 19.55 vs. -0.96 ml/mq; P = 0.03) worsened in group 0. In absolute terms, the only variables significantly affected by β-BT withdrawal were left ventricular EDV and ESV, appearing worse in group 0 (mean EDVi 115 vs. 84 ml/mq; mean ESVi 79 vs. 53.9 ml/mq, P = 0.03). No significant changes in terms of functional capacity were observed after β-BT withdrawal.

Conclusion: In HFrEF patients with concomitant right ventricular dysfunction, β-BT discontinuation did not produce any beneficial effects. In addition, despite maintenance of optimal heart rate control, β-BT discontinuation induced worsening of left ventricular remodelling. Our study corroborates the hypothesis that improvement in left ventricular function may likewise be a major determinant for improvement in right ventricular function, reducing pulmonary wedge pressure and right ventricular afterload, with only a marginal action of its negative inotropic effect. In conclusion, β-BT appears beneficial also in heart failure patients with biventricular dysfunction.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
双心室心力衰竭患者停用β-受体阻滞剂治疗对临床和功能的影响。
背景:近三分之二的射血分数减低型心力衰竭(HFrEF)患者存在右心室功能障碍,而右心室功能障碍曾被认为是功能减退和预后不良的独立预测因素。β-受体阻滞剂疗法(β-BT)可降低 HFrEF 患者的死亡率和住院率,并被批准作为一线疗法,而与同时存在的右心室功能无关。然而,交感神经系统激活在右心室功能障碍中的确切作用以及β-BT对这些患者的潜在作用(或危害)仍不清楚:研究目的:根据心肺运动测试(CPET)、超声心动图和血清生物标志物,评估临床稳定的双心室功能障碍患者停用β-BT对功能能力和右心室重塑的中期影响:在这项单中心、开放标签、前瞻性试验中,16 名患者入选,入选标准如下:患者临床病情稳定,无外周充血症状;接受最佳药物治疗(包括 β-BT)期间,NYHA 为 II-III 级;LVEF 为 40% 或更低;超声心动图显示右心室功能障碍。患者按 1 :以 1 : 1 的比例随机决定患者退出(0 组)或继续(1 组)β-BT。在第 0 组中,使用其他心率控制药物获得最佳心率。在基线、3个月和6个月后进行回声和血清生物标志物检测;在基线和6个月后进行CPET检测。采用 Mann-Whitney U 检验确定停用β-BT 与右心室功能障碍影响之间的关系:随访 6 个月时,S' DTI 改善(ΔS':1.01 vs. -0.92 cm/s;P = 0.03),而估计 PAPs(ΔPAPs:0.8 vs. -7.5 mmHg;P = 0.04)和左室回声重塑(ΔEDVi:19.55 vs. -0.96 ml/mq;P = 0.就绝对值而言,唯一受停用β-BT 显著影响的变量是左心室 EDV 和 ESV,0 组的情况更糟(平均 EDVi 115 对 84 ml/mq;平均 ESVi 79 对 53.9 ml/mq,P = 0.03)。停用β-BT后,在功能能力方面未观察到明显变化:结论:对于合并右心室功能障碍的 HFrEF 患者,停用 β-BT 不会产生任何益处。此外,尽管维持了最佳的心率控制,但停用β-BT会导致左心室重塑恶化。我们的研究证实了这一假设,即左心室功能的改善同样也是右心室功能改善的主要决定因素,它能降低肺楔压和右心室后负荷,而其负肌力作用则微乎其微。总之,β-BT 似乎对双心室功能不全的心衰患者也有益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine
Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
26.70%
发文量
189
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine is a monthly publication of the Italian Federation of Cardiology. It publishes original research articles, epidemiological studies, new methodological clinical approaches, case reports, design and goals of clinical trials, review articles, points of view, editorials and Images in cardiovascular medicine. Submitted articles undergo a preliminary review by the editor. Some articles may be returned to authors without further consideration. Those being considered for publication will undergo further assessment and peer-review by the editors and those invited to do so from a reviewer pool. ​
期刊最新文献
Changes and prognostic impact of noninvasive myocardial work indices in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Competing stroke mechanisms despite adequate oral anticoagulant therapy: the role of transesophageal echocardiography. Impact of symptom-to-balloon time in patients with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and complex lesions. Left bundle branch pacing for atrio-ventricular block after heart transplant: a safe and effective therapy? Type B aortic dissection in a patient with aberrant right vertebral artery and Kommerell-like diverticulum.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1