Usefulness of the DN4, S-LANSS, and painDETECT screening questionnaires to detect the neuropathic pain components in people with acute whiplash-associated disorders: a cross-sectional study.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Pain Medicine Pub Date : 2024-05-02 DOI:10.1093/pm/pnad165
Marta Ríos-León, Julian Taylor, Antonio Segura-Fragoso, Andrés Barriga-Martín
{"title":"Usefulness of the DN4, S-LANSS, and painDETECT screening questionnaires to detect the neuropathic pain components in people with acute whiplash-associated disorders: a cross-sectional study.","authors":"Marta Ríos-León, Julian Taylor, Antonio Segura-Fragoso, Andrés Barriga-Martín","doi":"10.1093/pm/pnad165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Although the presence of neuropathic pain (NP) components has been reported in whiplash-associated disorders (WAD), no studies have analyzed the usefulness of NP screening questionnaires to detect NP components in WAD. This study aimed to assess the usefulness of 3 NP screening tools (Douleur Neuropathique 4 [DN4], self-administered Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs [S-LANSS], and painDETECT questionnaire [PDQ]) to detect the presence of NP components in acute WAD.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A cross-sectional study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Hospital.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Of 188 eligible individuals, 50 people (68% women, mean age = 40.3 ± 12.5 years) with acute WAD (52% Grade III) were included.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Specialized physicians initially screened participants for the presence of NP components according to clinical practice and international recommendations. After physician assessment, blinded investigators used NP screening questionnaires (DN4, S-LANSS, and PDQ) to assess participants within 2 weeks of their accident. The diagnostic accuracy of these tools was analyzed and compared with the reference standard (physicians' assessments).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 3 screening questionnaires showed excellent discriminant validity (area under the curve: ≥0.8), especially S-LANSS (area under the curve: 0.9; P < .001). DN4 demonstrated the highest sensitivity (87%), followed by S-LANSS (75%), while S-LANSS and PDQ showed the highest specificity (85% and 82%, respectively). These tools demonstrated a strong correlation with the reference standard (S-LANSS: rho = 0.7; PDQ: rho = 0.62; DN4: rho = 0.7; all, P < .001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DN4, S-LANSS, and PDQ show excellent discriminant validity to detect the presence of NP components in acute WAD, especially S-LANSS. Initial screening with these tools might improve management of WAD.</p>","PeriodicalId":19744,"journal":{"name":"Pain Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11063748/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pain Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnad165","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Although the presence of neuropathic pain (NP) components has been reported in whiplash-associated disorders (WAD), no studies have analyzed the usefulness of NP screening questionnaires to detect NP components in WAD. This study aimed to assess the usefulness of 3 NP screening tools (Douleur Neuropathique 4 [DN4], self-administered Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs [S-LANSS], and painDETECT questionnaire [PDQ]) to detect the presence of NP components in acute WAD.

Design: A cross-sectional study.

Setting: Hospital.

Subjects: Of 188 eligible individuals, 50 people (68% women, mean age = 40.3 ± 12.5 years) with acute WAD (52% Grade III) were included.

Methods: Specialized physicians initially screened participants for the presence of NP components according to clinical practice and international recommendations. After physician assessment, blinded investigators used NP screening questionnaires (DN4, S-LANSS, and PDQ) to assess participants within 2 weeks of their accident. The diagnostic accuracy of these tools was analyzed and compared with the reference standard (physicians' assessments).

Results: The 3 screening questionnaires showed excellent discriminant validity (area under the curve: ≥0.8), especially S-LANSS (area under the curve: 0.9; P < .001). DN4 demonstrated the highest sensitivity (87%), followed by S-LANSS (75%), while S-LANSS and PDQ showed the highest specificity (85% and 82%, respectively). These tools demonstrated a strong correlation with the reference standard (S-LANSS: rho = 0.7; PDQ: rho = 0.62; DN4: rho = 0.7; all, P < .001).

Conclusions: The DN4, S-LANSS, and PDQ show excellent discriminant validity to detect the presence of NP components in acute WAD, especially S-LANSS. Initial screening with these tools might improve management of WAD.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DN4、S-LANSS 和 painDETECT 筛查问卷在检测急性鞭打相关疾病患者神经病理性疼痛成分方面的实用性:一项横断面研究。
目的:尽管有报道称鞭打相关疾病(WAD)中存在神经病理性疼痛(NP)成分,但尚未有研究分析 NP 筛查问卷对检测 WAD 中 NP 成分的有用性。本研究旨在评估三种 NP 筛查工具(Douleur Neuropathique 4 [DN4]、自制利兹神经病理性症状和体征评估 [S-LANSS] 以及 painDETECT 问卷 [PDQ])在检测急性 WAD 中是否存在 NP 成分方面的实用性:设计:横断面研究:研究对象在 188 名符合条件者中,有 50 人(68% 为女性,平均年龄 = 40.3 ± 12.5 岁)患有急性 WAD(52% 为 III 级):专科医生根据临床实践和国际建议对参与者进行初步筛查,以确定是否存在 NP 成分。在医生评估后,盲法研究人员在事故发生后两周内使用 NP 筛查问卷(DN4、S-LANSS、PDQ)对参与者进行评估。对这些工具的诊断准确性进行了分析,并与参考标准(医生评估)进行了比较:结果::三份筛查问卷显示出极佳的判别效度(曲线下面积 [AUC] ≥ 0.8),尤其是 S-LANSS(AUC:0.9;P 结论::DN4、S-LANSS 和 PDQ 的判别效度均高于医生的评估:DN4、S-LANSS 和 PDQ 在检测急性 WAD 中是否存在 NP 成分方面显示出极佳的判别效力,尤其是 S-LANSS。使用这些工具进行初步筛查可改善对 WAD 的管理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pain Medicine
Pain Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
6.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
187
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Pain Medicine is a multi-disciplinary journal dedicated to pain clinicians, educators and researchers with an interest in pain from various medical specialties such as pain medicine, anaesthesiology, family practice, internal medicine, neurology, neurological surgery, orthopaedic spine surgery, psychiatry, and rehabilitation medicine as well as related health disciplines such as psychology, neuroscience, nursing, nurse practitioner, physical therapy, and integrative health.
期刊最新文献
Case-Based Peer Teaching for Pain Medicine Fellows: A Curriculum for Diverse Residency Backgrounds Exploring new educational approaches in neuropathic pain: Assessing accuracy and consistency of AI responses from GPT-3.5 and GPT-4. Pudendal nerve entrapment syndrome: Clinical features, diagnosis, and management. Assessment of chronic pain and its association with functional capacity in patients with HTLV-1. Examination of a repaired medial meniscus: ultrasound's forte.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1