[Development of a Phantom and Analysis Program for Assessment of Positional Accuracy of Image-guided Radiation Therapy].

Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi Pub Date : 2024-02-20 Epub Date: 2023-12-26 DOI:10.6009/jjrt.2024-1389
Kosuke Hayashi, Hideharu Miura, Shuichi Ozawa, Kosaku Habara, Atsushi Kawakubo, Minoru Nakao, Takuro Okumura, Haruhide Kunimoto, Kiyoshi Yamada, Hiroshige Nozaki, Yasushi Nagata
{"title":"[Development of a Phantom and Analysis Program for Assessment of Positional Accuracy of Image-guided Radiation Therapy].","authors":"Kosuke Hayashi, Hideharu Miura, Shuichi Ozawa, Kosaku Habara, Atsushi Kawakubo, Minoru Nakao, Takuro Okumura, Haruhide Kunimoto, Kiyoshi Yamada, Hiroshige Nozaki, Yasushi Nagata","doi":"10.6009/jjrt.2024-1389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>We created a phantom and analysis program for the assessment of IGRT positional accuracy. We verified the accuracy of analysis and the practicality of this evaluation method at several facilities.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>End-to-end test was performed using an in-house phantom, and EPID images were acquired after displacement by an arbitrary amount using a micrometer, with after image registration as the reference. The difference between the center of the target and the irradiated field was calculated using our in-house analysis program and commercial software. The end-to-end test was conducted at three facilities, and the IGRT positional accuracy evaluation was verified.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>The maximum difference between the displacement of the target determined from the EPID image and the arbitrary amount of micrometer displacement was 0.24 mm for the in-house analysis program and 0.30 mm for the commercial software. The maximum difference between the center of the target and the irradiation field on EPID images acquired at the three facilities was 0.97 mm.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The proposed evaluation method using our in-house phantom and analysis program can be used for the assessment of IGRT positional accuracy.</p>","PeriodicalId":74309,"journal":{"name":"Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai zasshi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6009/jjrt.2024-1389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: We created a phantom and analysis program for the assessment of IGRT positional accuracy. We verified the accuracy of analysis and the practicality of this evaluation method at several facilities.

Method: End-to-end test was performed using an in-house phantom, and EPID images were acquired after displacement by an arbitrary amount using a micrometer, with after image registration as the reference. The difference between the center of the target and the irradiated field was calculated using our in-house analysis program and commercial software. The end-to-end test was conducted at three facilities, and the IGRT positional accuracy evaluation was verified.

Result: The maximum difference between the displacement of the target determined from the EPID image and the arbitrary amount of micrometer displacement was 0.24 mm for the in-house analysis program and 0.30 mm for the commercial software. The maximum difference between the center of the target and the irradiation field on EPID images acquired at the three facilities was 0.97 mm.

Conclusion: The proposed evaluation method using our in-house phantom and analysis program can be used for the assessment of IGRT positional accuracy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[开发用于评估图像引导放射治疗定位精度的模型和分析程序]。
目的:我们制作了一个模型和分析程序,用于评估 IGRT 位置的准确性。我们在几家机构验证了分析的准确性和这种评估方法的实用性:方法:使用内部模型进行端对端测试,使用千分尺测量任意量的位移后获取 EPID 图像,并以图像登记后的图像作为参考。使用我们的内部分析程序和商业软件计算目标中心与照射区域之间的差值。在三家医疗机构进行了端对端测试,并对 IGRT 定位精度评估进行了验证:结果:根据 EPID 图像确定的目标位移量与任意微米位移量之间的最大差值,内部分析程序为 0.24 毫米,商业软件为 0.30 毫米。在三台设备上获取的 EPID 图像中,靶中心与辐照场之间的最大差值为 0.97 毫米:结论:利用我们的内部模型和分析程序提出的评估方法可用于评估 IGRT 定位的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Long-term Reproducibility Evaluation of Fluoroscopy Dose Rate in Angiography Equipment]. [Root Cause Analysis for Incident Reporting Cases of Radiological Technologists Based on Years of Experience]. [Effect of Training Data Differences on Accuracy in MR Image Generation Using Pix2pix]. [Noise Characteristics of Summary Maps for Brain CT Perfusion: A Simulation Study Using a Digital Phantom and Clinical Images]. [Effect of Pulse Wave Synchronization on T1 Value in Cardiac T1 Mapping: Is Pulse Wave Synchronization a Substitute for Electrocardiogram Gating?]
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1