Gasless laparoscopic renal biopsy in canine cadavers: a preclinical study.

Brazilian journal of veterinary medicine Pub Date : 2023-12-20 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.29374/2527-2179.bjvm000523
Vanessa Milech, Bernardo Nascimento Antunes, Pâmela Caye, Hellen Fialho Hartmann, Marcella Teixeira Linhares, Vinícius da Silva Cadiñanos, Thiago Rodrigues da Cunha, Helena Castro Diniz, Maurício Veloso Brun
{"title":"Gasless laparoscopic renal biopsy in canine cadavers: a preclinical study.","authors":"Vanessa Milech, Bernardo Nascimento Antunes, Pâmela Caye, Hellen Fialho Hartmann, Marcella Teixeira Linhares, Vinícius da Silva Cadiñanos, Thiago Rodrigues da Cunha, Helena Castro Diniz, Maurício Veloso Brun","doi":"10.29374/2527-2179.bjvm000523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In this study we aimed to analyze the feasibility of the gasless renal biopsy technique in canine cadavers. The cadavers were randomly divided into two groups: laparoscopic GCG, in which gasless laparoscopy was performed and GCP, laparoscopy with pneumoperitoneum was performed. The procedures were randomly performed on the right and left kidneys. The total surgical time, procedural steps, and intraoperative complications were recorded. The degree of difficulty of the surgical approaches was evaluated by the surgeon, assistant, and external evaluators. Renal samples were evaluated for quality, number of glomeruli, and proportion of renal cortex. The total operative time was higher in the GCG group than in the GCP group (p < 0.01). Additionally, positioning of the second portal and platform positioning took longer than the other steps. The surgical groups differed from each other in the Likert scale values for almost all the parameters regarding the difficulty of the surgical approaches (p < 0.05), with higher scores in the GCG group than in the GCP group. Based on the video recordings, the GCP group had higher scores than the GCG group for degrees of difficulty of the approach (p < 0.05). Renal histological parameters were similar between the surgical groups and surgical sides. Our study findings indicate that the proposed <i>gasless</i> renal biopsy technique is feasible. The longer operative time and technical difficulties in the gasless approach did not affect the quality of the renal specimens.</p>","PeriodicalId":72458,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian journal of veterinary medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10750501/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian journal of veterinary medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29374/2527-2179.bjvm000523","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this study we aimed to analyze the feasibility of the gasless renal biopsy technique in canine cadavers. The cadavers were randomly divided into two groups: laparoscopic GCG, in which gasless laparoscopy was performed and GCP, laparoscopy with pneumoperitoneum was performed. The procedures were randomly performed on the right and left kidneys. The total surgical time, procedural steps, and intraoperative complications were recorded. The degree of difficulty of the surgical approaches was evaluated by the surgeon, assistant, and external evaluators. Renal samples were evaluated for quality, number of glomeruli, and proportion of renal cortex. The total operative time was higher in the GCG group than in the GCP group (p < 0.01). Additionally, positioning of the second portal and platform positioning took longer than the other steps. The surgical groups differed from each other in the Likert scale values for almost all the parameters regarding the difficulty of the surgical approaches (p < 0.05), with higher scores in the GCG group than in the GCP group. Based on the video recordings, the GCP group had higher scores than the GCG group for degrees of difficulty of the approach (p < 0.05). Renal histological parameters were similar between the surgical groups and surgical sides. Our study findings indicate that the proposed gasless renal biopsy technique is feasible. The longer operative time and technical difficulties in the gasless approach did not affect the quality of the renal specimens.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
犬尸体无气腹腔镜肾活检:临床前研究。
本研究旨在分析无气肾活检技术在犬尸体中的可行性。犬尸体被随机分为两组:腹腔镜 GCG 组(进行无气腹腔镜手术)和 GCP 组(进行腹腔镜加腹腔积气手术)。手术随机在左右肾脏上进行。记录了总手术时间、手术步骤和术中并发症。手术方法的难易程度由外科医生、助手和外部评估人员进行评估。对肾脏样本的质量、肾小球数量和肾皮质比例进行了评估。GCG 组的总手术时间高于 GCP 组(P < 0.01)。此外,第二门户定位和平台定位所需的时间也长于其他步骤。在几乎所有关于手术方法难度的参数上,各手术组的李克特量表值都存在差异(P < 0.05),GCG 组的得分高于 GCP 组。根据视频记录,GCP 组在手术难度方面的得分高于 GCG 组(P < 0.05)。手术组和手术侧的肾组织学参数相似。我们的研究结果表明,建议的无气肾活检技术是可行的。无气方法的手术时间较长,技术难度较大,但这并不影响肾脏标本的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Breast carcinoma in a dog: sensitivity and specificity between cytopathology and histopathology. Report of Giardia duodenalis in a non-captive chital Axis axis (Erxleben 1777) in Santa Catarina, South of Brazil. Outbreak of dermatophilosis in horses possibly transmitted by sharing riding equipment. First report of thyroid goiter in the marine ornamental fish Gramma brasiliensis. Evaluation of the efficiency of entomopathogenic nematodes exposed to different temperatures of vinasse in the control of Stomoxys calcitrans (Linnaeus, 1758) (Diptera: Muscidae).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1