Measuring SETPOINT vocational interest dimensions: The development and validation of three short scales

IF 5.2 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED Journal of Vocational Behavior Pub Date : 2023-12-27 DOI:10.1016/j.jvb.2023.103959
Daphne Xin Hou , Rong Su , Louis Tay
{"title":"Measuring SETPOINT vocational interest dimensions: The development and validation of three short scales","authors":"Daphne Xin Hou ,&nbsp;Rong Su ,&nbsp;Louis Tay","doi":"10.1016/j.jvb.2023.103959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Vocational interest research has seen a resurgence in the applied psychology literature, given evidence showing its predictive validity for key work outcomes. There is a need for integrative, reliable, and valid measures to advance research in this space. While the RIASEC model of vocational interests (Holland, 1997) has been the most widely used and studied typology for the assessment of six broad interest types, more recent work with the SETPOINT model (Su et al., 2019) suggests that eight interest dimensions provide better fit to interest data and demonstrates stronger criterion-related validity evidence. However, to date, no short scales are available for measuring the broad SETPOINT dimensions. We developed three short scales with 8, 24, and 41 items, respectively, that capture the eight dimensions of the SETPOINT model in an integrative manner. Using a sample of 972 full-time working adults assessed across two-time points over five weeks, we validated these three short scales following robust psychometric analyses. These scales are shown to have good psychometric properties. The development and validation of the three short scales help close the operational gap for the SETPOINT model and further facilitate the study of interests and use of interest measures in academic and applied settings.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":51344,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vocational Behavior","volume":"149 ","pages":"Article 103959"},"PeriodicalIF":5.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vocational Behavior","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001879123001197","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Vocational interest research has seen a resurgence in the applied psychology literature, given evidence showing its predictive validity for key work outcomes. There is a need for integrative, reliable, and valid measures to advance research in this space. While the RIASEC model of vocational interests (Holland, 1997) has been the most widely used and studied typology for the assessment of six broad interest types, more recent work with the SETPOINT model (Su et al., 2019) suggests that eight interest dimensions provide better fit to interest data and demonstrates stronger criterion-related validity evidence. However, to date, no short scales are available for measuring the broad SETPOINT dimensions. We developed three short scales with 8, 24, and 41 items, respectively, that capture the eight dimensions of the SETPOINT model in an integrative manner. Using a sample of 972 full-time working adults assessed across two-time points over five weeks, we validated these three short scales following robust psychometric analyses. These scales are shown to have good psychometric properties. The development and validation of the three short scales help close the operational gap for the SETPOINT model and further facilitate the study of interests and use of interest measures in academic and applied settings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
测量 SETPOINT 职业兴趣维度:三个简易量表的开发与验证
职业兴趣研究在应用心理学文献中再次兴起,因为有证据表明,它对关键工作结果具有预测效力。我们需要综合、可靠和有效的测量方法来推动这一领域的研究。虽然 RIASEC 职业兴趣模型(Holland,1997 年)一直是最广泛使用和研究的类型学,用于评估六种广泛的兴趣类型,但最近关于 SETPOINT 模型(Su 等人,2019 年)的研究表明,八个兴趣维度能更好地拟合兴趣数据,并显示出更强的标准相关效度证据。然而,迄今为止,还没有测量 SETPOINT 广泛维度的简易量表。我们开发了三个短量表,分别包含 8 个、24 个和 41 个项目,以综合的方式捕捉 SETPOINT 模型的八个维度。我们对 972 名全职工作的成年人进行了为期五周、跨越两个时间点的抽样评估,并通过可靠的心理测量分析对这三个短量表进行了验证。结果表明,这些量表具有良好的心理测量特性。这三个简易量表的开发和验证有助于缩小 SETPOINT 模型的操作差距,进一步促进兴趣研究以及兴趣测量在学术和应用环境中的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Vocational Behavior
Journal of Vocational Behavior PSYCHOLOGY, APPLIED-
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
5.40%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: The Journal of Vocational Behavior publishes original empirical and theoretical articles offering unique insights into the realms of career choice, career development, and work adjustment across the lifespan. These contributions are not only valuable for academic exploration but also find applications in counseling and career development programs across diverse sectors such as colleges, universities, business, industry, government, and the military. The primary focus of the journal centers on individual decision-making regarding work and careers, prioritizing investigations into personal career choices rather than organizational or employer-level variables. Example topics encompass a broad range, from initial career choices (e.g., choice of major, initial work or organization selection, organizational attraction) to the development of a career, work transitions, work-family management, and attitudes within the workplace (such as work commitment, multiple role management, and turnover).
期刊最新文献
Does grade point average have a long-lasting impact on career success later in life? A resource caravans' perspective from adolescence to mid-career Give it your all or hardly give? The role of mentors' beliefs about protégé advancement potential and gender in mentoring relationships Are they more proactive or less engaged? Understanding employees' career proactivity after promotion failure through an attribution lens Humble leader, successful follower: Linking leader humility with follower career outcomes via leader competence from an implicit leadership theory perspective The psychological experience of flexibility in the workplace: How psychological job control and boundary control profiles relate to the wellbeing of flexible workers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1