Eosinophil to lymphocyte ratio may predict OCS reduction and change in quality of life (AQLQ) resulting from asthma biological treatment.

IF 2.9 4区 医学 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY Immunopharmacology and Immunotoxicology Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-22 DOI:10.1080/08923973.2023.2300300
Olga Branicka, Radosław Gawlik, Joanna Glück
{"title":"Eosinophil to lymphocyte ratio may predict OCS reduction and change in quality of life (AQLQ) resulting from asthma biological treatment.","authors":"Olga Branicka, Radosław Gawlik, Joanna Glück","doi":"10.1080/08923973.2023.2300300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Simple clinical parameters that could be helpful in choice of monoclonal antibodies and prediction of their effectiveness are being sought. The aim was to assess if neutrophil-to-lymphocyte, eosinophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios may predict outcomes of biologic therapy for severe asthma.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective, single-center study including severe asthma patients treated with three different biologics. The blood ratios were assessed at initiation of treatment (point 0) and after six months (point 1). The chi-square test was used to analyze differences in nominal variables. Quantitative variables were compared by Student's <i>t</i>-test, Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>53 patients with severe asthma were included, among them 21 patients (40%) treated with omalizumab and 32 patients (60%) with mepolizumab or benralizumab. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios did not change during six-month-course of biological treatment. Eosinophil-to-lymphocyte ratio was higher at the point 0 (<i>p</i> = 0.016) in the group treated with anti-eosinophils than in the omalizumab group and lower at the point 1 (<i>p</i> = 0.006). In the anti-eosinophil group this ratio decreased between points 0 and 1 (<i>p</i> < 0.001). In the omalizumab group there was an inverse correlation between the initial ratio and oral corticosteroid dose reduction (r<sub>s</sub> = -0,67). In the a/eos group there were significant correlations between initial ratio and age (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.36), and ACQ (r<sub>s</sub> = -0.4) and ACQ (r<sub>s</sub> = 0.41) measured at the point 1.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pretreatment eosinophil-to-lymphocyte ratio may predict oral corticosteroid dose reduction resulting from omalizumab treatment and change in quality of life and asthma control resulting from anti-IL-5 and IL-5R treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":13420,"journal":{"name":"Immunopharmacology and Immunotoxicology","volume":" ","pages":"212-217"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Immunopharmacology and Immunotoxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08923973.2023.2300300","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/22 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Simple clinical parameters that could be helpful in choice of monoclonal antibodies and prediction of their effectiveness are being sought. The aim was to assess if neutrophil-to-lymphocyte, eosinophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios may predict outcomes of biologic therapy for severe asthma.

Methods: Retrospective, single-center study including severe asthma patients treated with three different biologics. The blood ratios were assessed at initiation of treatment (point 0) and after six months (point 1). The chi-square test was used to analyze differences in nominal variables. Quantitative variables were compared by Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests.

Results: 53 patients with severe asthma were included, among them 21 patients (40%) treated with omalizumab and 32 patients (60%) with mepolizumab or benralizumab. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratios did not change during six-month-course of biological treatment. Eosinophil-to-lymphocyte ratio was higher at the point 0 (p = 0.016) in the group treated with anti-eosinophils than in the omalizumab group and lower at the point 1 (p = 0.006). In the anti-eosinophil group this ratio decreased between points 0 and 1 (p < 0.001). In the omalizumab group there was an inverse correlation between the initial ratio and oral corticosteroid dose reduction (rs = -0,67). In the a/eos group there were significant correlations between initial ratio and age (rs = 0.36), and ACQ (rs = -0.4) and ACQ (rs = 0.41) measured at the point 1.

Conclusions: Pretreatment eosinophil-to-lymphocyte ratio may predict oral corticosteroid dose reduction resulting from omalizumab treatment and change in quality of life and asthma control resulting from anti-IL-5 and IL-5R treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
嗜酸性粒细胞与淋巴细胞的比率可预测哮喘生物治疗导致的 OCS 减少和生活质量(AQLQ)的变化。
目的:目前正在寻找有助于选择单克隆抗体和预测其疗效的简单临床参数。目的是评估中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞、嗜酸性粒细胞与淋巴细胞以及血小板与淋巴细胞的比率是否可以预测重症哮喘生物制剂治疗的疗效。方法:回顾性单中心研究,包括接受三种不同生物制剂治疗的重症哮喘患者。在开始治疗时(0 点)和 6 个月后(1 点)对血液比率进行评估。采用卡方检验分析名义变量的差异。定量变量的比较采用学生 t 检验、Mann-Whitney U 检验或 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验:共纳入53名重症哮喘患者,其中21名患者(40%)接受了奥马珠单抗治疗,32名患者(60%)接受了mepolizumab或benralizumab治疗。在为期六个月的生物治疗过程中,中性粒细胞对淋巴细胞比率和血小板对淋巴细胞比率没有发生变化。与奥马珠单抗组相比,抗嗜酸性粒细胞组的嗜酸性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率在 0 点时更高(p = 0.016),在 1 点时更低(p = 0.006)。抗嗜酸性粒细胞组的这一比率在 0 点和 1 点之间有所下降(p s =-0.67)。在抗嗜酸性粒细胞组中,初始比值与年龄(rs =0.36)、ACQ(rs =-0.4)以及在第 1 点测量的 ACQ(rs =0.41)之间存在显著相关性:治疗前的嗜酸性粒细胞与淋巴细胞比率可预测奥马珠单抗治疗后口服皮质类固醇剂量的减少,以及抗IL-5和IL-5R治疗后生活质量和哮喘控制率的变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
133
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal Immunopharmacology and Immunotoxicology is devoted to pre-clinical and clinical drug discovery and development targeting the immune system. Research related to the immunoregulatory effects of various compounds, including small-molecule drugs and biologics, on immunocompetent cells and immune responses, as well as the immunotoxicity exerted by xenobiotics and drugs. Only research that describe the mechanisms of specific compounds (not extracts) is of interest to the journal. The journal will prioritise preclinical and clinical studies on immunotherapy of disorders such as chronic inflammation, allergy, autoimmunity, cancer etc. The effects of small-drugs, vaccines and biologics against central immunological targets as well as cell-based therapy, including dendritic cell therapy, T cell adoptive transfer and stem cell therapy, are topics of particular interest. Publications pointing towards potential new drug targets within the immune system or novel technology for immunopharmacological drug development are also welcome. With an immunoscience focus on drug development, immunotherapy and toxicology, the journal will cover areas such as infection, allergy, inflammation, tumor immunology, degenerative disorders, immunodeficiencies, neurology, atherosclerosis and more. Immunopharmacology and Immunotoxicology will accept original manuscripts, brief communications, commentaries, mini-reviews, reviews, clinical trials and clinical cases, on the condition that the results reported are based on original, clinical, or basic research that has not been published elsewhere in any journal in any language (except in abstract form relating to paper communicated to scientific meetings and symposiums).
期刊最新文献
Emulsified isoflurane pretreatment attenuates myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injuries by suppressing toll-like Receptor-4. Clinical features, treatment, and outcome of nivolumab-induced cholangitis. Neuroprotection of isoorientin against microglia activation induced by lipopolysaccharide via regulating GSK3β, NF-κb and Nrf2/HO-1 pathways. Aloin alleviates corneal injury in alkali burn via inhibiting neutrophil extracellular traps and promoting Nrf2. Beta-carotene ameliorates diabetic nephropathy in rats: involvement of AMPK/SIRT1/autophagy pathway.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1