Establishing Safe Surgical Parameters for Placement of C2 Pedicle Screws: A Retrospective Study.

IF 0.9 4区 医学 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery Pub Date : 2024-03-29 DOI:10.1055/a-2235-5381
Bekir Tunç, Denizhan Divanlıoğlu, Göksal Günerhan, Egemen Işıtan, Emin Çağıl, Ali Dalgıç
{"title":"Establishing Safe Surgical Parameters for Placement of C2 Pedicle Screws: A Retrospective Study.","authors":"Bekir Tunç, Denizhan Divanlıoğlu, Göksal Günerhan, Egemen Işıtan, Emin Çağıl, Ali Dalgıç","doi":"10.1055/a-2235-5381","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong> The study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of transpedicular instrumentation for the C2 vertebra and to establish the precise anatomical parameters and boundaries within which this procedure can be safely and effectively performed.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong> This retrospective study analyzed 66 patients who underwent C2 transpedicular screw fixation. Preoperative and postoperative axial, sagittal, and coronal computed tomography (CT) scans were examined. Anatomical measurements were taken to determine the horizontal and vertical distances from the C2 pedicle projection to the vertebral foramen using CT images. Based on the anatomical location of the vertebral artery within the C2 vertebral foramen, the patients were divided into four subgroups using the horizontal pedicle width (HPW) and vertical pedicle width (VPW) of the C2 spine.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong> The average age of the patients included in the study was 46.48 years. The patient population comprised 32 (48.5%) males and 34 (51.5%) females. Based on the anatomical measurements, the distribution of C2 vertebra types was as follows: type 1 accounted for 68.9%, type 2 for 3.8%, type 3 for 16.7%, and type 4 for 10.6%. Significantly narrower pedicle widths were observed in types 2 and 4 compared to other vertebra types. Type 2 had the largest medial angle (MA), while type 4 had the narrowest MA. In terms of the sagittal plane, type 4 exhibited the widest MA and type 3 had the narrowest MA, but these differences were not statistically significant. Among the cases, 12 (18.1%) involved the vertebral foramen, with 1 case (8.3%) showing screw-related vertebral artery injury (0.75% of all screws). No vertebral artery injuries were observed with the other transpedicular screws.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong> Preoperative anatomical measurements for patients undergoing transpedicular instrumentation on the C2 vertebra should include planning CT images on three planes: axial, sagittal, and coronal.</p>","PeriodicalId":16544,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurological surgery. Part A, Central European neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2235-5381","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:  The study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of transpedicular instrumentation for the C2 vertebra and to establish the precise anatomical parameters and boundaries within which this procedure can be safely and effectively performed.

Methods:  This retrospective study analyzed 66 patients who underwent C2 transpedicular screw fixation. Preoperative and postoperative axial, sagittal, and coronal computed tomography (CT) scans were examined. Anatomical measurements were taken to determine the horizontal and vertical distances from the C2 pedicle projection to the vertebral foramen using CT images. Based on the anatomical location of the vertebral artery within the C2 vertebral foramen, the patients were divided into four subgroups using the horizontal pedicle width (HPW) and vertical pedicle width (VPW) of the C2 spine.

Results:  The average age of the patients included in the study was 46.48 years. The patient population comprised 32 (48.5%) males and 34 (51.5%) females. Based on the anatomical measurements, the distribution of C2 vertebra types was as follows: type 1 accounted for 68.9%, type 2 for 3.8%, type 3 for 16.7%, and type 4 for 10.6%. Significantly narrower pedicle widths were observed in types 2 and 4 compared to other vertebra types. Type 2 had the largest medial angle (MA), while type 4 had the narrowest MA. In terms of the sagittal plane, type 4 exhibited the widest MA and type 3 had the narrowest MA, but these differences were not statistically significant. Among the cases, 12 (18.1%) involved the vertebral foramen, with 1 case (8.3%) showing screw-related vertebral artery injury (0.75% of all screws). No vertebral artery injuries were observed with the other transpedicular screws.

Conclusion:  Preoperative anatomical measurements for patients undergoing transpedicular instrumentation on the C2 vertebra should include planning CT images on three planes: axial, sagittal, and coronal.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建立安全的 C2 椎骨椎弓根螺钉植入手术参数:回顾性研究
研究目的该研究旨在评估C2椎体经关节置入器械的安全性和可行性,并确定可安全有效实施该手术的精确解剖参数和界限:这项回顾性研究分析了66例接受C2椎体跨关节螺钉固定术的患者。对术前和术后的轴位、矢状位和冠状位颈椎计算机断层扫描(CT)进行了检查。通过颈椎 CT 图像进行解剖测量,以确定从 C2 椎弓根投影到椎孔的水平和垂直距离。根据椎动脉在 C2 椎孔内的解剖位置,用 C2 脊柱的水平椎弓根宽度(HPW)和垂直椎弓根宽度(VPW)将患者分为四个亚组:研究对象的平均年龄为 46.48 岁。其中男性 32 人(占 48.5%),女性 34 人(占 51.5%)。根据解剖测量结果,C2椎体类型分布如下:1型占 68.9%,2型占 3.8%,3型占 16.7%,4型占 10.6%。与其他类型相比,2 型和 4 型的椎弓根宽度明显较窄。2型的内侧角(MA)最大,而4型的内侧角(MA)最窄。在矢状面上,4 型的内侧角最宽,3 型的内侧角最窄,但这些差异没有统计学意义。在这些病例中,12 例(18.1%)涉及椎孔,1 例(8.3%)出现与螺钉相关的椎动脉损伤(占所有螺钉的 0.75%)。其他经椎螺钉未发现椎动脉损伤:结论:对C2椎体进行经椎间孔器械植入术的患者,术前解剖测量应包括规划颈椎CT图像的三个平面:轴位、矢状位和冠状位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
90
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurological Surgery Part A: Central European Neurosurgery (JNLS A) is a major publication from the world''s leading publisher in neurosurgery. JNLS A currently serves as the official organ of several national neurosurgery societies. JNLS A is a peer-reviewed journal publishing original research, review articles, and technical notes covering all aspects of neurological surgery. The focus of JNLS A includes microsurgery as well as the latest minimally invasive techniques, such as stereotactic-guided surgery, endoscopy, and endovascular procedures. JNLS A covers purely neurosurgical topics.
期刊最新文献
Local Prophylactic Teicoplanin Effect on Spinal Fusion Surgery: A Comparative Retrospective Study. Interleukin-6 in Spinal Cord Injury: Could Immunomodulation Replace Immunosuppression in the Management of Acute Traumatic Spinal Cord Injuries? Inside Out Cranioplasty: A Novel Technique for One-Stage Reconstruction of Persistent Scalp Necrosis. CD68 in Cerebral Aneurysms of Smokers and Nonsmokers: An Immunohistochemical Analysis. Delayed Internal Carotid Artery Dissection Mimicking Cerebral Vasospasms after Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Case Report.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1