The financial burden of diabetes-related foot disease in Australia: a systematic review.

IF 2.5 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of Foot and Ankle Research Pub Date : 2023-12-27 DOI:10.1186/s13047-023-00688-y
Nicoletta Frescos, Lucy Stopher, Shirley Jansen, Michelle R Kaminski
{"title":"The financial burden of diabetes-related foot disease in Australia: a systematic review.","authors":"Nicoletta Frescos, Lucy Stopher, Shirley Jansen, Michelle R Kaminski","doi":"10.1186/s13047-023-00688-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Diabetes-related foot disease (DFD) is a common, costly, and severe complication of diabetes mellitus. DFD is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality and poses a significant burden on patients, healthcare systems and society. While the detrimental impact of DFD is widely recognised, the precise financial implications of its management in Australia remain unclear due to inconsistent and inconclusive contemporary data. Therefore, the aim of this review was to identify, summarise and synthesise existing evidence to estimate the costs associated with DFD management in Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, AMED, CINAHL, Joanna Briggs Institute EBP, and the Cochrane Library from November 2011 to July 2023. Australian studies investigating costs associated with DFD management were eligible for inclusion. Two independent reviewers performed the study selection, data extraction and quality assessment steps. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS 2022) checklist was used to assess study quality. A descriptive analysis was performed due to limited existing evidence and large heterogeneity between study populations to conduct meta-analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Three economic evaluations were included in the review. One study was rated as 'poor', one as 'very good' and one as 'excellent' when assessed against the CHEERS checklist. The estimated cost of DFD management varied between studies and comparisons were not possible due to the different methodological approaches and data sources. The studies were unable to provide an overall cost of DFD with respect to all aspects of care as they did not capture the multi-faceted level of care throughout the entire patient journey between sectors and over time.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is limited contemporary evidence for the costs associated with DFD management within Australia, particularly related to direct costs and resource utilisation. Further research into the economic impact of DFD management is needed to inform optimisation of national service delivery and improve health outcomes for individuals with DFD in Australia. Integrating real-world data on impact of clinical interventions with parallel economic evaluation could be a valuable approach for future research, which would offer a more comprehensive understanding of the clinical and economic outcomes beyond solely model-based evaluations.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>PROSPERO Registration No. CRD42022290910.</p>","PeriodicalId":49164,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10751954/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foot and Ankle Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13047-023-00688-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Diabetes-related foot disease (DFD) is a common, costly, and severe complication of diabetes mellitus. DFD is associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality and poses a significant burden on patients, healthcare systems and society. While the detrimental impact of DFD is widely recognised, the precise financial implications of its management in Australia remain unclear due to inconsistent and inconclusive contemporary data. Therefore, the aim of this review was to identify, summarise and synthesise existing evidence to estimate the costs associated with DFD management in Australia.

Methods: Searches were conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, AMED, CINAHL, Joanna Briggs Institute EBP, and the Cochrane Library from November 2011 to July 2023. Australian studies investigating costs associated with DFD management were eligible for inclusion. Two independent reviewers performed the study selection, data extraction and quality assessment steps. The Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS 2022) checklist was used to assess study quality. A descriptive analysis was performed due to limited existing evidence and large heterogeneity between study populations to conduct meta-analyses.

Results: Three economic evaluations were included in the review. One study was rated as 'poor', one as 'very good' and one as 'excellent' when assessed against the CHEERS checklist. The estimated cost of DFD management varied between studies and comparisons were not possible due to the different methodological approaches and data sources. The studies were unable to provide an overall cost of DFD with respect to all aspects of care as they did not capture the multi-faceted level of care throughout the entire patient journey between sectors and over time.

Conclusion: There is limited contemporary evidence for the costs associated with DFD management within Australia, particularly related to direct costs and resource utilisation. Further research into the economic impact of DFD management is needed to inform optimisation of national service delivery and improve health outcomes for individuals with DFD in Australia. Integrating real-world data on impact of clinical interventions with parallel economic evaluation could be a valuable approach for future research, which would offer a more comprehensive understanding of the clinical and economic outcomes beyond solely model-based evaluations.

Trial registration: PROSPERO Registration No. CRD42022290910.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚糖尿病足病的经济负担:系统回顾。
背景:糖尿病足病(DFD)是糖尿病的一种常见并发症,代价高昂且病情严重。糖尿病足与高发病率和高死亡率有关,给患者、医疗系统和社会造成了沉重负担。虽然 DFD 的有害影响已得到广泛认可,但由于当代数据不一致且没有定论,澳大利亚对其管理的确切财务影响仍不清楚。因此,本综述旨在识别、总结和归纳现有证据,以估算澳大利亚 DFD 管理的相关成本:方法:2011 年 11 月至 2023 年 7 月期间,在 MEDLINE、Embase、AMED、CINAHL、Joanna Briggs Institute EBP 和 Cochrane Library 中进行了检索。调查与 DFD 管理相关的成本的澳大利亚研究符合纳入条件。两名独立审稿人负责进行研究筛选、数据提取和质量评估等步骤。综合卫生经济评估报告标准(CHEERS 2022)核对表用于评估研究质量。由于现有证据有限,且研究人群之间存在较大的异质性,因此进行了描述性分析,以进行荟萃分析:结果:三项经济评价被纳入综述。根据CHEERS检查表进行评估,一项研究被评为 "差",一项被评为 "很好",一项被评为 "优秀"。不同研究对 DFD 管理成本的估算各不相同,由于方法和数据来源不同,无法进行比较。这些研究无法提供DFD各方面护理的总体成本,因为它们没有反映出不同部门和不同时间段内患者整个治疗过程中的多方面护理水平:在澳大利亚,与 DFD 管理相关的当代成本证据有限,尤其是与直接成本和资源利用相关的成本。需要进一步研究DFD管理对经济的影响,以便为优化国家服务提供信息,改善澳大利亚DFD患者的健康状况。将临床干预影响的真实世界数据与平行经济评估相结合,可能是未来研究的一种有价值的方法,这将提供对临床和经济结果的更全面的了解,而不仅仅是基于模型的评估:试验注册:PROSPERO 注册号:CRD42022290910。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
10.30%
发文量
83
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Foot and Ankle Research, the official journal of the Australian Podiatry Association and The College of Podiatry (UK), is an open access journal that encompasses all aspects of policy, organisation, delivery and clinical practice related to the assessment, diagnosis, prevention and management of foot and ankle disorders. Journal of Foot and Ankle Research covers a wide range of clinical subject areas, including diabetology, paediatrics, sports medicine, gerontology and geriatrics, foot surgery, physical therapy, dermatology, wound management, radiology, biomechanics and bioengineering, orthotics and prosthetics, as well the broad areas of epidemiology, policy, organisation and delivery of services related to foot and ankle care. The journal encourages submissions from all health professionals who manage lower limb conditions, including podiatrists, nurses, physical therapists and physiotherapists, orthopaedists, manual therapists, medical specialists and general medical practitioners, as well as health service researchers concerned with foot and ankle care. The Australian Podiatry Association and the College of Podiatry (UK) have reserve funds to cover the article-processing charge for manuscripts submitted by its members. Society members can email the appropriate contact at Australian Podiatry Association or The College of Podiatry to obtain the corresponding code to enter on submission.
期刊最新文献
Resources for innovative learning of anatomy and foot ossification: Graphic design and virtual reality. 3D-printed custom ankle braces for people with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease: A pilot study. An evaluation of a virtual musculoskeletal podiatry service implemented to address prolonged National Health Service waiting times. An overview of the risk factors for producing fifth metatarsal fracture in sports activities: A systematic review. Contested role boundaries and professional title: Implications of the independent review of podiatric surgery in Australia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1