Risk factor prioritization in infrastructure handover to operations

IF 7.4 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT International Journal of Project Management Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijproman.2023.102558
Thiago de Almeida Rodrigues , Udechukwu Ojiako , Alasdair Marshall , Caroline Maria de Miranda Mota , Fikri T. Dweiri , Maxwell Chipulu , Lavagnon Ika , Eman Jasim Hussain AlRaeesi
{"title":"Risk factor prioritization in infrastructure handover to operations","authors":"Thiago de Almeida Rodrigues ,&nbsp;Udechukwu Ojiako ,&nbsp;Alasdair Marshall ,&nbsp;Caroline Maria de Miranda Mota ,&nbsp;Fikri T. Dweiri ,&nbsp;Maxwell Chipulu ,&nbsp;Lavagnon Ika ,&nbsp;Eman Jasim Hussain AlRaeesi","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2023.102558","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Worldwide, there are numerous reports of major infrastructure projects failing at handover to the operations phase following completion of the project development and delivery phase. While poor risk identification and prioritization has been identified as one of the causes of this failure, we know little about the specific risk factors project beneficiaries consider most important at this point of handover. With these issues in mind, we draw on a survey of key dry port project beneficiaries in Brazil to examine and prioritize the risks considered most important at handover to operations. Paying particular attention to project beneficiary heterogeneity and incongruence, we find eight key risk factors – ‘<em>Cost</em>’, ‘<em>Location</em>’, ‘<em>Infrastructure</em>’, ‘<em>Accessibility</em>’, ‘<em>Operational</em>’, ‘<em>Economic</em>’, ‘<em>Political and social’,</em> and ‘<em>Environment</em>’ that warrant emphasis. We reveal congruence among some project beneficiaries in terms of prioritization. We also find variations in handover to operations risks based on project characteristics. However, these characteristics appear to have very limited impact on prioritization. Our findings further point to risk blind spots at critical moments of project handover to operations. Overall, this paper contributes to project risk management/prioritization literature in the context of handover to operations.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48429,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Project Management","volume":"42 1","pages":"Article 102558"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Project Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263786323001230","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Worldwide, there are numerous reports of major infrastructure projects failing at handover to the operations phase following completion of the project development and delivery phase. While poor risk identification and prioritization has been identified as one of the causes of this failure, we know little about the specific risk factors project beneficiaries consider most important at this point of handover. With these issues in mind, we draw on a survey of key dry port project beneficiaries in Brazil to examine and prioritize the risks considered most important at handover to operations. Paying particular attention to project beneficiary heterogeneity and incongruence, we find eight key risk factors – ‘Cost’, ‘Location’, ‘Infrastructure’, ‘Accessibility’, ‘Operational’, ‘Economic’, ‘Political and social’, and ‘Environment’ that warrant emphasis. We reveal congruence among some project beneficiaries in terms of prioritization. We also find variations in handover to operations risks based on project characteristics. However, these characteristics appear to have very limited impact on prioritization. Our findings further point to risk blind spots at critical moments of project handover to operations. Overall, this paper contributes to project risk management/prioritization literature in the context of handover to operations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在基础设施移交运营过程中确定风险因素的优先次序
在世界范围内,有许多关于大型基础设施项目在完成项目开发和交付阶段后,在向运营阶段移交时失败的报道。虽然风险识别和优先排序不当被认为是失败的原因之一,但我们对项目受益人认为在移交阶段最重要的具体风险因素知之甚少。考虑到这些问题,我们利用对巴西主要陆港项目受益人的调查,研究并优先考虑在移交运营时被认为最重要的风险。在特别关注项目受益人的异质性和不一致性的同时,我们发现 "成本"、"位置"、"基础设施"、"可达性"、"运营"、"经济"、"政治和社会 "以及 "环境 "这八个关键风险因素值得重点关注。我们发现,一些项目受益人在优先顺序方面存在一致性。我们还发现,根据项目特点,移交到运营阶段的风险也各不相同。然而,这些特征似乎对优先排序的影响非常有限。我们的研究结果进一步指出了在项目移交运营的关键时刻存在的风险盲点。总之,本文对项目移交运营背景下的项目风险管理/优先排序文献有所贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
26.20%
发文量
83
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Project Management is recognized as a premier publication in the field of project management and organization studies. Our main objective is to contribute to the advancement of project management and project organizing through the publication of groundbreaking research. We are dedicated to presenting fresh insights and new knowledge in various domains, including project management, program management, portfolio management, project-oriented organizations, project networks, and project-oriented societies. We actively encourage submissions that explore project management and organizing from the perspectives of organizational behavior, strategy, supply chain management, technology, change management, innovation, and sustainability. By publishing high-quality research articles and reviews, we strive to revolutionize the academic landscape and propel the field of project management forward. We invite researchers, scholars, and practitioners to contribute to our journal and be a part of the progressive development in this exciting field.
期刊最新文献
Empowering project team to perform: Directive and facilitative antecedents When project outcomes matter: Organizational integration in managing long-term target benefits Governance mechanisms and practices in project-based interorganisational collaboration for innovation Lifecycles, processes, and practices in strategic projects and programs Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1