Disasters “Through the looking glass”

IF 1.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Disaster Prevention and Management Pub Date : 2023-12-29 DOI:10.1108/dpm-06-2023-0134
Jason Von Meding, Carla Brisotto, Haleh Mehdipour, Colin Lasch
{"title":"Disasters “Through the looking glass”","authors":"Jason Von Meding, Carla Brisotto, Haleh Mehdipour, Colin Lasch","doi":"10.1108/dpm-06-2023-0134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>This paper will challenge normative disaster studies and practice by arguing that thriving communities require the pursuit of imperfection and solidarity. The authors use Lewis Carroll’s Looking-Glass World as a lens to critique both how disasters are understood, and how disaster researchers and practitioners operate, within a climate-change affected world where cultural, political and historical constructs are constantly shifting.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The paper will undertake an analysis of both disasters and disaster studies, using this unique (and satirical) critical lens, looking at the unfolding of systemic mistakes, oppressions and mal-development that are revealed in contemporary disasters, that were once the critiques of Lewis Carroll’s Victorian-era England. It shows how disaster “resilience-building” can actually be a mechanism for continuing the status quo, and how persistent colonizing institutions and systems can be in reproducing themselves.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The authors argue the liberation of disaster studies as a process of challenging the doctrines and paradigms that have been created and given meaning by those in power – particularly white, Western/Northern/Eurocentric, male power. They suggest how researchers and practitioners might view disasters – and their own praxis – Through the Looking Glass in an effort to better understand the power, domination and violence of the status quo, but also as a means of creating a vision for something better, arguing that liberation is possible through community-led action grounded in love, solidarity, difference and interconnection.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>The paper uses a novel conceptual lens as a way to challenge researchers and practitioners to avoid the utopic trap that wishes to achieve homogenized perfection and instead find an “imperfect” and complex adaptation that moves toward justice. Considering this idea through satire and literary criticism will lend support to empirical research that makes a similar case using data.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47687,"journal":{"name":"Disaster Prevention and Management","volume":"114 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disaster Prevention and Management","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/dpm-06-2023-0134","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

This paper will challenge normative disaster studies and practice by arguing that thriving communities require the pursuit of imperfection and solidarity. The authors use Lewis Carroll’s Looking-Glass World as a lens to critique both how disasters are understood, and how disaster researchers and practitioners operate, within a climate-change affected world where cultural, political and historical constructs are constantly shifting.

Design/methodology/approach

The paper will undertake an analysis of both disasters and disaster studies, using this unique (and satirical) critical lens, looking at the unfolding of systemic mistakes, oppressions and mal-development that are revealed in contemporary disasters, that were once the critiques of Lewis Carroll’s Victorian-era England. It shows how disaster “resilience-building” can actually be a mechanism for continuing the status quo, and how persistent colonizing institutions and systems can be in reproducing themselves.

Findings

The authors argue the liberation of disaster studies as a process of challenging the doctrines and paradigms that have been created and given meaning by those in power – particularly white, Western/Northern/Eurocentric, male power. They suggest how researchers and practitioners might view disasters – and their own praxis – Through the Looking Glass in an effort to better understand the power, domination and violence of the status quo, but also as a means of creating a vision for something better, arguing that liberation is possible through community-led action grounded in love, solidarity, difference and interconnection.

Originality/value

The paper uses a novel conceptual lens as a way to challenge researchers and practitioners to avoid the utopic trap that wishes to achieve homogenized perfection and instead find an “imperfect” and complex adaptation that moves toward justice. Considering this idea through satire and literary criticism will lend support to empirical research that makes a similar case using data.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
灾难 "穿越时空
目的 本文将对规范性的灾害研究和实践提出挑战,认为繁荣的社区需要追求不完美和团结。作者以刘易斯-卡罗尔(Lewis Carroll)的 "望远镜世界"(Looking-Glass World)为视角,批判了在一个受气候变化影响、文化、政治和历史建构不断变化的世界中,人们是如何理解灾害的,灾害研究人员和从业人员又是如何开展工作的。设计/方法/途径 本文将使用这一独特的(讽刺性的)批判视角,对灾害和灾害研究进行分析,审视当代灾害所揭示的系统性错误、压迫和发展弊端,而这些曾是刘易斯-卡罗尔笔下维多利亚时代英国的批判对象。研究结果作者认为,灾害研究的解放是一个挑战理论和范式的过程,这些理论和范式是由掌权者--尤其是白人、西方/北方/以欧洲为中心的男性掌权者--创造并赋予意义的。他们建议研究人员和从业人员如何通过 "望远镜 "来看待灾难--以及他们自己的实践--以更好地理解现状中的权力、统治和暴力,同时也将其作为一种创造美好愿景的手段,认为通过以爱、团结、差异和相互联系为基础的社区主导行动,解放是可能的。原创性/价值 本文使用了一种新颖的概念视角,以此来挑战研究人员和从业人员,避免陷入乌托邦式的陷阱,即希望实现同质化的完美,而是找到一种 "不完美 "的、复杂的适应方式,以实现正义。通过讽刺和文学批评来思考这一观点,将为利用数据提出类似观点的实证研究提供支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Disaster Prevention and Management, An International Journal, sets out to advance the available knowledge in the fields of disaster prevention and management and to act as an integrative agent for extant methodologies and activities relating to disaster emergency and crisis management. Publishing high quality, refereed papers, the journal supports the exchange of ideas, experience and practice between academics, practitioners and policy-makers.
期刊最新文献
Creative research with indigenous women: challenging marginalisation through collective spaces and livelihoods practices Punishment and survival – incarcerated persons' experiences with extreme heat in Texas prisons Facilitating the voices of people with disabilities in disaster research: a case study of participatory timeline methodologies in Sindhupalchok Nepal Reflexivity and interdisciplinarity: the reflexive journey of an interdisciplinary research team in disaster risk reduction Comparative study for underlying concepts of land acquisition during post-disaster recovery in Italy, the United States and Japan
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1