Clinical Outcomes in Hospitalized Patients with Cancer and New versus Preexistent Atrial Fibrillation.

IF 4.8 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes Pub Date : 2024-12-19 DOI:10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad077
Ioanna Kosmidou, Megan Durkin, Eileen Vella, Neisha DeJesus, Sofia Romero, Rosalyn Gamboa, Paul Jenkins, Brian Shaffer, Richard Steingart, Jennifer Liu
{"title":"Clinical Outcomes in Hospitalized Patients with Cancer and New versus Preexistent Atrial Fibrillation.","authors":"Ioanna Kosmidou, Megan Durkin, Eileen Vella, Neisha DeJesus, Sofia Romero, Rosalyn Gamboa, Paul Jenkins, Brian Shaffer, Richard Steingart, Jennifer Liu","doi":"10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is limited information on the prognostic impact of new onset versus preexistent atrial fibrillation (AF) in hospitalized patients with cancer.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>We sought to determine the clinical impact of new onset AF (NOAF) compared with preexistent AF in hospitalized patients with cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients with cancer hospitalized over the course of 1 year with clinically manifest new or preexistent AF were enrolled in the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center AF registry. The relationship of NOAF to the primary composite outcome of all cause death, cardiovascular (CV) rehospitalization, or cerebrovascular event (CVE), as well as secondary CV endpoints, were analysed using proportional hazards regression. Where applicable, the competing risk of death was accounted for using methodology described by Fine and Gray.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 606 patients included in the analysis, 313 (51.7%) had NOAF and 293 (48.3%) had preexistent AF. Patients with NOAF were younger and had less frequent prior history of CV disease compared with patients with preexistent AF. At follow-up, patients with NOAF had a higher adjusted hazard for the primary composite outcome versus patients with prior AF (hazard ratio [HR] 1.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27, 2.13, P = 0.002), as well as the secondary CV composite outcome of clinical AF recurrence, CV death, CV rehospitalization, or CVE (HR 2.17, 95% CI 1.57, 2.99, P < 0.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In hospitalized patients with cancer and electrocardiographically manifest new versus preexistent AF, NOAF was associated with a higher risk for the primary composite outcome of all-cause death, CV rehospitalization, or CVE.</p>","PeriodicalId":11869,"journal":{"name":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","volume":" ","pages":"689-697"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11656064/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Heart Journal - Quality of Care and Clinical Outcomes","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcad077","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is limited information on the prognostic impact of new onset versus preexistent atrial fibrillation (AF) in hospitalized patients with cancer.

Objectives: We sought to determine the clinical impact of new onset AF (NOAF) compared with preexistent AF in hospitalized patients with cancer.

Methods: All patients with cancer hospitalized over the course of 1 year with clinically manifest new or preexistent AF were enrolled in the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center AF registry. The relationship of NOAF to the primary composite outcome of all cause death, cardiovascular (CV) rehospitalization, or cerebrovascular event (CVE), as well as secondary CV endpoints, were analysed using proportional hazards regression. Where applicable, the competing risk of death was accounted for using methodology described by Fine and Gray.

Results: Among 606 patients included in the analysis, 313 (51.7%) had NOAF and 293 (48.3%) had preexistent AF. Patients with NOAF were younger and had less frequent prior history of CV disease compared with patients with preexistent AF. At follow-up, patients with NOAF had a higher adjusted hazard for the primary composite outcome versus patients with prior AF (hazard ratio [HR] 1.64, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27, 2.13, P = 0.002), as well as the secondary CV composite outcome of clinical AF recurrence, CV death, CV rehospitalization, or CVE (HR 2.17, 95% CI 1.57, 2.99, P < 0.0001).

Conclusions: In hospitalized patients with cancer and electrocardiographically manifest new versus preexistent AF, NOAF was associated with a higher risk for the primary composite outcome of all-cause death, CV rehospitalization, or CVE.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
癌症和新发与原有心房颤动住院患者的临床疗效。
背景:关于癌症住院患者新发房颤与既往房颤对预后影响的信息十分有限:关于癌症住院患者新发房颤与既往房颤对预后影响的信息十分有限:我们试图确定新发房颤(NOAF)与原有房颤对住院癌症患者的临床影响:纪念斯隆-凯特琳癌症中心(MSKCC)心房颤动登记处登记了一年内住院的所有临床表现为新发或原有心房颤动的癌症患者。采用比例危险回归分析了NOAF与全因死亡、心血管(CV)再住院或脑血管事件(CVE)等主要复合结局以及次要CV终点之间的关系。在适用的情况下,采用 Fine 和 Gray 所描述的方法对死亡的竞争风险进行了计算:在纳入分析的 606 名患者中,313 人(51.7%)患有无房颤,293 人(48.3%)患有原有房颤。与原有房颤患者相比,无房颤患者更年轻,既往冠心病病史更少。在随访过程中,无房颤患者与既往有房颤患者相比,其主要综合结果(HR 1.64,95% CI 1.27,2.13,P=0.002)和次要 CV 综合结果(临床房颤复发、CV 死亡、CV 再住院或 CVE)的调整后危险度更高(HR 2.17,95% CI 1.57,2.99,PConclusions:在癌症住院患者中,心电图表现为新发房颤与原有房颤的患者中,NOAF与全因死亡、CV再住院或CVE等主要复合结局的较高风险相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
3.80%
发文量
76
期刊介绍: European Heart Journal - Quality of Care & Clinical Outcomes is an English language, peer-reviewed journal dedicated to publishing cardiovascular outcomes research. It serves as an official journal of the European Society of Cardiology and maintains a close alliance with the European Heart Health Institute. The journal disseminates original research and topical reviews contributed by health scientists globally, with a focus on the quality of care and its impact on cardiovascular outcomes at the hospital, national, and international levels. It provides a platform for presenting the most outstanding cardiovascular outcomes research to influence cardiovascular public health policy on a global scale. Additionally, the journal aims to motivate young investigators and foster the growth of the outcomes research community.
期刊最新文献
Mortality and morbidity after transcatheter aortic valve implantation compared to an age- and sex-matched control population: a population-based study from the SWEDEHEART registry. Antithrombotic therapy following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a Danish nationwide study. Intersectionality of inequalities in revascularisation and outcomes for acute coronary syndrome in England: nationwide linked cohort study. Assessing the Health Impact of Low Seafood Omega-3 Intake on Ischemic Heart Disease: Trends, Demographic Disparities, and Forecasts. Temporal trends of prescription rates, oral anticoagulants dose, clinical outcomes and factors associated with non-anticoagulation in patients with incident atrial fibrillation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1