Effectiveness and efficiency of telerehabilitation on functionality after spinal cord injury: A matched case-control study.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q1 REHABILITATION PM&R Pub Date : 2024-08-01 Epub Date: 2024-03-07 DOI:10.1002/pmrj.13125
Alejandro García-Rudolph, Mark Andrew Wright, Carlos Yepes, Narda Murillo, Lucas Conesa, Ignasi Soriano, Raquel Bautista, Eloy Opisso, Josep Maria Tormos, Josep Medina
{"title":"Effectiveness and efficiency of telerehabilitation on functionality after spinal cord injury: A matched case-control study.","authors":"Alejandro García-Rudolph, Mark Andrew Wright, Carlos Yepes, Narda Murillo, Lucas Conesa, Ignasi Soriano, Raquel Bautista, Eloy Opisso, Josep Maria Tormos, Josep Medina","doi":"10.1002/pmrj.13125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Telerehabilitation in spinal cord injury (teleSCI) is a growing field that can improve access to care and health outcomes in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). The clinical effectiveness of teleSCI is not known.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To compare independence in activities of daily living and mobility capacity in patients following teleSCI and matched controls undergoing traditional rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Matched case-control study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>TeleSCI occurring in home setting (cases) versus traditional rehabilitation on inpatient unit (controls).</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Forty-two consecutive patients with SCI followed with teleSCI were compared to 42 historical rehabilitation inpatients (controls) matched for age, time since injury to rehabilitation admission, level of injury (paraplegia/tetraplegia), complete or incomplete injury, and etiology (traumatic/nontraumatic). The teleSCI group (n = 42) was also compared to the complete cohort of historical controls (n = 613).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>The teleSCI group followed home-based telerehabilitation (3.5 h/day, 5 days/week, 67 days average duration) and historical controls followed in-person rehabilitation.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure(s): </strong>The Functional Independence Measure (FIM), the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) and the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI). We formally compared gains, efficiency and effectiveness. International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury and the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) were used.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The teleSCI group (57.1% nontraumatic, 71.4% paraplegia, 73.8% incomplete, 52.4% AIS grade D) showed no significant differences compared with historical controls in AIS grades, neurological levels, duration, gains, efficiency and effectiveness in FIM, SCIM, or WISCI, although the teleSCI cohort had significantly higher admission FIM scores compared with the complete cohort of historical controls.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TeleSCI may provide similar improvements in mobility and functional outcomes as traditional rehabilitation in medically stable patients (predominantly with paraplegia and motor incomplete SCI) when provided with appropriate support and equipment.</p>","PeriodicalId":20354,"journal":{"name":"PM&R","volume":" ","pages":"815-825"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PM&R","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.13125","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/3/7 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Telerehabilitation in spinal cord injury (teleSCI) is a growing field that can improve access to care and health outcomes in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). The clinical effectiveness of teleSCI is not known.

Objectives: To compare independence in activities of daily living and mobility capacity in patients following teleSCI and matched controls undergoing traditional rehabilitation.

Design: Matched case-control study.

Setting: TeleSCI occurring in home setting (cases) versus traditional rehabilitation on inpatient unit (controls).

Participants: Forty-two consecutive patients with SCI followed with teleSCI were compared to 42 historical rehabilitation inpatients (controls) matched for age, time since injury to rehabilitation admission, level of injury (paraplegia/tetraplegia), complete or incomplete injury, and etiology (traumatic/nontraumatic). The teleSCI group (n = 42) was also compared to the complete cohort of historical controls (n = 613).

Interventions: The teleSCI group followed home-based telerehabilitation (3.5 h/day, 5 days/week, 67 days average duration) and historical controls followed in-person rehabilitation.

Main outcome measure(s): The Functional Independence Measure (FIM), the Spinal Cord Independence Measure (SCIM) and the Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury (WISCI). We formally compared gains, efficiency and effectiveness. International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury and the American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale (AIS) were used.

Results: The teleSCI group (57.1% nontraumatic, 71.4% paraplegia, 73.8% incomplete, 52.4% AIS grade D) showed no significant differences compared with historical controls in AIS grades, neurological levels, duration, gains, efficiency and effectiveness in FIM, SCIM, or WISCI, although the teleSCI cohort had significantly higher admission FIM scores compared with the complete cohort of historical controls.

Conclusions: TeleSCI may provide similar improvements in mobility and functional outcomes as traditional rehabilitation in medically stable patients (predominantly with paraplegia and motor incomplete SCI) when provided with appropriate support and equipment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
远程康复对脊髓损伤后功能恢复的效果和效率:一项匹配病例对照研究。
导言:脊髓损伤远程康复(teleSCI)是一个不断发展的领域,可改善脊髓损伤(SCI)患者获得护理的机会和健康状况。远程脊髓损伤康复的临床效果尚不清楚:目的:比较接受远程SCI治疗的患者与接受传统康复治疗的匹配对照组在日常生活活动中的独立性和行动能力:设计:匹配病例对照研究:环境:在家中进行远程SCI(病例)与在住院部进行传统康复(对照):共有 42 名连续接受远程 SCI 治疗的 SCI 患者与 42 名历史康复住院患者(对照组)进行了比较,两组患者的年龄、受伤后到康复入院的时间、受伤程度(截瘫/四肢瘫痪)、完全性或不完全性损伤以及病因(创伤性/非创伤性)均相匹配。远程SCI 组(42 人)还与完整的历史对照组(613 人)进行了比较:干预措施:远程SCI组采用家庭远程康复(每天3.5小时,每周5天,平均持续67天),历史对照组采用面对面康复:主要结果测量指标:功能独立性测量(FIM)、脊髓独立性测量(SCIM)和脊髓损伤步行指数(WISCI)。我们对收益、效率和效果进行了正式比较。我们采用了脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准(ISNCSCI)和美国脊髓损伤协会损伤量表(AIS):远程SCI 组(57.1% 非创伤性、71.4% 截瘫、73.8% 不完全、52.4% AIS D)在 AIS 等级、神经水平、持续时间、FIM、SCIM 或 WISCI 的收益、效率和效果方面与历史对照组无显著差异,但远程SCI 组的入院 FIM 分数显著高于历史对照组的完整组别:如果提供适当的支持和设备,远程 SCI 可为病情稳定的患者(主要是截瘫和运动功能不全 SCI 患者)提供与传统康复类似的活动能力和功能改善效果。本文受版权保护。保留所有权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PM&R
PM&R REHABILITATION-SPORT SCIENCES
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.80%
发文量
187
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Topics covered include acute and chronic musculoskeletal disorders and pain, neurologic conditions involving the central and peripheral nervous systems, rehabilitation of impairments associated with disabilities in adults and children, and neurophysiology and electrodiagnosis. PM&R emphasizes principles of injury, function, and rehabilitation, and is designed to be relevant to practitioners and researchers in a variety of medical and surgical specialties and rehabilitation disciplines including allied health.
期刊最新文献
Assessing the generalizability of a National Burn Database to the United States pediatric burn injury population. The relationship between falls and hip bone mineral density of paretic and nonparetic limbs after stroke. Physical medicine and rehabilitation clerkships in medical school: A valuable and integrated addition to the advanced clerkships. Student concussion symptoms and tailored accommodations during use of a return to learn program in 13 public high schools. Percutaneous ultrasound-guided A1 pulley release utilizing a modified 20-gauge spinal needle.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1