The role of stakeholder structure in fostering community ownership: A case study of community-based projects

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES International Journal of Health Planning and Management Pub Date : 2023-12-28 DOI:10.1002/hpm.3750
Yurie Kobashi, Aya Goto, Chunhuei Chi
{"title":"The role of stakeholder structure in fostering community ownership: A case study of community-based projects","authors":"Yurie Kobashi,&nbsp;Aya Goto,&nbsp;Chunhuei Chi","doi":"10.1002/hpm.3750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Community health projects have played a crucial role in improving health issues. Listening to communities' voices and achieving community ownership are essential for conducting effective health projects. However, there are limited studies on the frameworks for collecting, aggregating, and operationalizing community preferences and values. In this study, we selected two cases of community field surveys from Japan and Cambodia to discuss who may represent a community and propose a practical approach to achieving community ownership. Both cases involved various stakeholders. From the insights of these two cases, we suggested the following three key components in the community project: the community representative, the communicator, and the institute outside the community. Notably, the community representative's role as the community's direct voice should be properly recognized and institutionalised to establish community ownership. We proposed the following key terms of the qualifications of community representatives: they should be able to represent voices from the community, should have extensive experience to decide the project direction and manage the project, and should be independent of outside actors. Our theoretical model of the structure of different stakeholder groups in community-based projects will be helpful to accelerate community capacity strengthening; moreover, it can help build the appropriate community institution and process, including multi-stakeholder groups to promote community ownership in health programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":47637,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Planning and Management","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hpm.3750","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH POLICY & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Community health projects have played a crucial role in improving health issues. Listening to communities' voices and achieving community ownership are essential for conducting effective health projects. However, there are limited studies on the frameworks for collecting, aggregating, and operationalizing community preferences and values. In this study, we selected two cases of community field surveys from Japan and Cambodia to discuss who may represent a community and propose a practical approach to achieving community ownership. Both cases involved various stakeholders. From the insights of these two cases, we suggested the following three key components in the community project: the community representative, the communicator, and the institute outside the community. Notably, the community representative's role as the community's direct voice should be properly recognized and institutionalised to establish community ownership. We proposed the following key terms of the qualifications of community representatives: they should be able to represent voices from the community, should have extensive experience to decide the project direction and manage the project, and should be independent of outside actors. Our theoretical model of the structure of different stakeholder groups in community-based projects will be helpful to accelerate community capacity strengthening; moreover, it can help build the appropriate community institution and process, including multi-stakeholder groups to promote community ownership in health programs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利益相关者结构在促进社区自主权方面的作用:社区项目案例研究。
社区卫生项目在改善健康问题方面发挥了至关重要的作用。倾听社区的声音和实现社区自主权对于开展有效的健康项目至关重要。然而,关于社区偏好和价值观的收集、汇总和操作框架的研究却十分有限。在本研究中,我们选取了日本和柬埔寨的两个社区实地调查案例,讨论谁可以代表社区,并提出实现社区自主权的实用方法。这两个案例都涉及不同的利益相关者。从这两个案例中,我们提出了社区项目中的三个关键要素:社区代表、沟通者和社区外机构。值得注意的是,社区代表作为社区的直接代言人,其作用应得到适当认可并制度化,以建立社区自主权。我们对社区代表的资格提出了以下关键条件:他们应能代表来自社区的声音,应具有决定项目方向和管理项目的丰富经验,应独立于外部参与者。我们关于社区项目中不同利益相关者群体结构的理论模型将有助于加快社区能力的加强;此外,它还有助于建立适当的社区机构和程序,包括多方利益相关者群体,以促进健康项目中的社区自主权。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
3.70%
发文量
197
期刊介绍: Policy making and implementation, planning and management are widely recognized as central to effective health systems and services and to better health. Globalization, and the economic circumstances facing groups of countries worldwide, meanwhile present a great challenge for health planning and management. The aim of this quarterly journal is to offer a forum for publications which direct attention to major issues in health policy, planning and management. The intention is to maintain a balance between theory and practice, from a variety of disciplines, fields and perspectives. The Journal is explicitly international and multidisciplinary in scope and appeal: articles about policy, planning and management in countries at various stages of political, social, cultural and economic development are welcomed, as are those directed at the different levels (national, regional, local) of the health sector. Manuscripts are invited from a spectrum of different disciplines e.g., (the social sciences, management and medicine) as long as they advance our knowledge and understanding of the health sector. The Journal is therefore global, and eclectic.
期刊最新文献
Voluntary private health insurance and cancer screening utilisation in Europe. Issue Information Reassessing physician interactions with pharmaceutical companies: A response to Murayama et al. and analysis of survey discrepancies. The experiences of minority language users in health and social care research: A systematic review. Steering them softly with a quality label? A case study analysis of a patient channelling strategy without financial incentives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1