Comparing Methods of Seizure Response Monitoring During Electroconvulsive Therapy: Comparer les méthodes de surveillance des interventions en cas de crise durant la thérapie par électrochocs.

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 PSYCHIATRY Canadian Journal of Psychiatry-Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-28 DOI:10.1177/07067437231223340
Timothy Hierlihy, Gerald Mugford, Weldon Bonnell, Mohamed A Mekawy
{"title":"Comparing Methods of Seizure Response Monitoring During Electroconvulsive Therapy: Comparer les méthodes de surveillance des interventions en cas de crise durant la thérapie par électrochocs.","authors":"Timothy Hierlihy, Gerald Mugford, Weldon Bonnell, Mohamed A Mekawy","doi":"10.1177/07067437231223340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is used to treat several mental illnesses. Seizure duration is used to determine if the administered stimulus was adequate. Duration is estimated by electroencephalogram (EEG) interpretation and/or observed motor response (OMR). Neither method is considered the gold standard. This study investigated the relationship between the 2 methods. The hypothesis was that both EEG and OMR would be significantly positively correlated. Previous researchers have suggested that the 2 methods resulted in different estimates.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A case series was conducted using recorded estimates obtained prospectively from 102 ECTs on adult psychiatric inpatients.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A strong positive association was not observed in this study, correlation coefficient 0.510 (<i>p</i> < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that the 2 methods differ, and further research is needed to determine the best indicator of adequate treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":55283,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Psychiatry-Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie","volume":" ","pages":"288-295"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10924580/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Psychiatry-Revue Canadienne De Psychiatrie","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/07067437231223340","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/28 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) is used to treat several mental illnesses. Seizure duration is used to determine if the administered stimulus was adequate. Duration is estimated by electroencephalogram (EEG) interpretation and/or observed motor response (OMR). Neither method is considered the gold standard. This study investigated the relationship between the 2 methods. The hypothesis was that both EEG and OMR would be significantly positively correlated. Previous researchers have suggested that the 2 methods resulted in different estimates.

Methods: A case series was conducted using recorded estimates obtained prospectively from 102 ECTs on adult psychiatric inpatients.

Results: A strong positive association was not observed in this study, correlation coefficient 0.510 (p < 0.001).

Conclusions: This study suggests that the 2 methods differ, and further research is needed to determine the best indicator of adequate treatment.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
电休克疗法期间癫痫发作反应监测方法的比较。
目的:电休克疗法(ECT)用于治疗多种精神疾病。癫痫发作持续时间用于确定所给予的刺激是否足够。持续时间是通过脑电图(EEG)解释和/或观察到的运动反应(OMR)来估计的。这两种方法都不被视为黄金标准。本研究调查了这两种方法之间的关系。假设是脑电图和 OMR 都呈显著正相关。以前的研究人员认为,这两种方法会产生不同的估计值:方法:使用从 102 名成年精神病住院患者的电痉挛疗法中获得的前瞻性记录估计值进行了病例系列研究:结果:本研究未观察到强烈的正相关,相关系数为 0.510(p 结论:本研究表明,两种方法导致了不同的估计值:本研究表明,两种方法存在差异,需要进一步研究以确定充分治疗的最佳指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
69
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Established in 1956, The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry (The CJP) has been keeping psychiatrists up-to-date on the latest research for nearly 60 years. The CJP provides a forum for psychiatry and mental health professionals to share their findings with researchers and clinicians. The CJP includes peer-reviewed scientific articles analyzing ongoing developments in Canadian and international psychiatry.
期刊最新文献
Short-Term Psychodynamic Psychotherapy is the First-Line Option for Depression and Treatment Resistant Depression According to Available Evidence. Clinical Correlates of Antipsychotic Plasma Levels with Long-Acting Paliperidone: Corrélats cliniques des concentrations plasmiques de palipéridone à libération prolongée. Clinical Characteristics of Inpatients with Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder Treated with Electroconvulsive Therapy: A Population-Level Cross-Sectional Study: Titre: Caractéristiques cliniques des patients hospitalisés présentant un trouble du spectre de la schizophrénie et traités par électrochocs : Une étude de population transversale. Cognitive-Behavioural Social Skills Training: Mediation of Treatment Outcomes in a Randomized Controlled Trial for Youth at Risk of Psychosis: L'entraînement aux compétences sociales cognitivo-comportementales : variables médiatrices des résultats thérapeutiques dans le cadre d'un essai clinique randomisé pour les jeunes présentant un risque de psychose. Brain Age Gap as a Predictor of Early Treatment Response and Functional Outcomes in First-Episode Schizophrenia: A Longitudinal Study: L'écart d'âge cérébral comme prédicteur de la réponse en début de traitement et des résultats fonctionnels dans un premier épisode de schizophrénie : une étude longitudinale.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1