Intention to Use Postpartum Contraceptive and Its Determinants in Sub-Saharan Africa: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 1.6 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.) Pub Date : 2023-12-15 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1089/whr.2023.0059
Natnael Atnafu Gebeyehu, Kirubel Dagnaw Tegegne
{"title":"Intention to Use Postpartum Contraceptive and Its Determinants in Sub-Saharan Africa: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Natnael Atnafu Gebeyehu, Kirubel Dagnaw Tegegne","doi":"10.1089/whr.2023.0059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The postpartum period is a critical moment for the delivery of family planning services. However, the utilization of family planning among women in sub-Saharan Africa is not optimal. Therefore, the current study aims to assess the intention to use postpartum contraception and its related determinants in the sub-Saharan African setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study utilized a comprehensive search strategy that involved searching several databases, including PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and online research institutional repository homes. Data extraction was performed using Microsoft Excel, and statistical analysis was conducted using STATA software (version 14). To assess publication bias, a forest plot, Begg's rank test, and Egger's regression test were employed. Heterogeneity was evaluated using the <i>I<sup>2</sup></i> statistic, and an overall estimated analysis was conducted. In addition, sensitivity analysis was performed to examine the impact of each study on the overall estimate. Meta-regression analysis was conducted to identify potential sources of heterogeneity. Finally, the pooled odds ratio (OR) for associated factors was calculated.</p><p><strong>Result: </strong>After reviewing 1,321 articles, 14 studies were deemed eligible for inclusion in this meta-analysis. The final analysis comprised a total of 39,936 study participants. The overall intention to use postpartum contraception in sub-Saharan Africa was found to be 62.21% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 55.532-68.875). In subgroup analysis, the highest prevalence of intention was observed in Ethiopia (66.71%; 95% CI: 50.36-83.05), while the lowest prevalence was reported in Ghana (59.39%; 95% CI: 50.22-68.57). The intention to use contraception was found to be 67.22% (95% CI: 62.37-72.07) and 54.53% (95% CI: 46.61-62.45) for institutional and community-based studies, respectively. Maternal educational status (OR = 1.22; 95% CI: 1.09-1.38) and husbands' approval of contraceptive use (OR = 2.395; 95% CI: 1.256-4.567) were identified as predictors of intention to use postpartum contraception.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>In conclusion, the results of our study show a comparatively low intention toward the use of postpartum contraception, in contrast to findings reported in other countries. As such, we recommend that stakeholders prioritize maternal education and encourage male partner involvement in family planning decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":75329,"journal":{"name":"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","volume":"4 1","pages":"627-641"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10754424/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Women's health reports (New Rochelle, N.Y.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/whr.2023.0059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The postpartum period is a critical moment for the delivery of family planning services. However, the utilization of family planning among women in sub-Saharan Africa is not optimal. Therefore, the current study aims to assess the intention to use postpartum contraception and its related determinants in the sub-Saharan African setting.

Methods: This study utilized a comprehensive search strategy that involved searching several databases, including PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and online research institutional repository homes. Data extraction was performed using Microsoft Excel, and statistical analysis was conducted using STATA software (version 14). To assess publication bias, a forest plot, Begg's rank test, and Egger's regression test were employed. Heterogeneity was evaluated using the I2 statistic, and an overall estimated analysis was conducted. In addition, sensitivity analysis was performed to examine the impact of each study on the overall estimate. Meta-regression analysis was conducted to identify potential sources of heterogeneity. Finally, the pooled odds ratio (OR) for associated factors was calculated.

Result: After reviewing 1,321 articles, 14 studies were deemed eligible for inclusion in this meta-analysis. The final analysis comprised a total of 39,936 study participants. The overall intention to use postpartum contraception in sub-Saharan Africa was found to be 62.21% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 55.532-68.875). In subgroup analysis, the highest prevalence of intention was observed in Ethiopia (66.71%; 95% CI: 50.36-83.05), while the lowest prevalence was reported in Ghana (59.39%; 95% CI: 50.22-68.57). The intention to use contraception was found to be 67.22% (95% CI: 62.37-72.07) and 54.53% (95% CI: 46.61-62.45) for institutional and community-based studies, respectively. Maternal educational status (OR = 1.22; 95% CI: 1.09-1.38) and husbands' approval of contraceptive use (OR = 2.395; 95% CI: 1.256-4.567) were identified as predictors of intention to use postpartum contraception.

Conclusion: In conclusion, the results of our study show a comparatively low intention toward the use of postpartum contraception, in contrast to findings reported in other countries. As such, we recommend that stakeholders prioritize maternal education and encourage male partner involvement in family planning decisions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
撒哈拉以南非洲地区使用产后避孕药具的意向及其决定因素:系统回顾与元分析》。
背景:产后时期是提供计划生育服务的关键时刻。然而,撒哈拉以南非洲妇女的计划生育利用率并不理想。因此,本研究旨在评估撒哈拉以南非洲地区妇女使用产后避孕药具的意向及其相关决定因素:本研究采用综合搜索策略,搜索了多个数据库,包括 PubMed、Scopus、EMBASE、Science Direct、Google Scholar 和在线研究机构资料库。数据提取使用 Microsoft Excel,统计分析使用 STATA 软件(第 14 版)。为评估发表偏倚,采用了森林图、Begg秩检验和Egger回归检验。使用 I2 统计量评估异质性,并进行总体估计分析。此外,还进行了敏感性分析,以检查每项研究对总体估计值的影响。还进行了元回归分析,以确定潜在的异质性来源。最后,计算了相关因素的集合几率比(OR):结果:在查阅了 1,321 篇文章后,有 14 项研究被认为符合纳入本次荟萃分析的条件。最终的分析共包括 39,936 名研究参与者。在撒哈拉以南非洲地区,使用产后避孕药具的总体意向为 62.21%(95% 置信区间 [CI]:55.532-68.875)。在分组分析中,埃塞俄比亚的避孕意愿最高(66.71%;95% 置信区间:50.36-83.05),而加纳的避孕意愿最低(59.39%;95% 置信区间:50.22-68.57)。在机构研究和社区研究中,使用避孕药具的意愿分别为 67.22%(95% CI:62.37-72.07)和 54.53%(95% CI:46.61-62.45)。产妇受教育程度(OR = 1.22;95% CI:1.09-1.38)和丈夫是否同意使用避孕药具(OR = 2.395;95% CI:1.256-4.567)被认为是产后避孕意愿的预测因素:总之,我们的研究结果表明,与其他国家的研究结果相比,使用产后避孕药具的意愿相对较低。因此,我们建议相关人员优先考虑孕产妇教育,并鼓励男性伴侣参与计划生育决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Young Adults' Understanding of Modifiable Risk Factors of Infertility. Increased risks of Maternal Mental Health Conditions Following the COVID-19 Pandemic. Gut Akkermansia muciniphila, Prevotellaceae, and Enterobacteriaceae spp. as Possible Markers in Women-Related Nutritional and Clinical Trials: Familial Mediterranean Fever Disease. Impact of Illness Perception in Overweight and Obesity on Bio-Functional Age and Eating/Movement Behavior-A Follow-Up Study. Web-Based Development of Standard Operating Procedures and Midwifery Trainings at Ugandan Birth Clinic in the Framework of Implementing a Quality Improvement System for the MEWU-Midwife Exchange with Uganda.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1