Childhood Maltreatment and Dementia Risk Factors in Midlife: A Prospective Investigation.

Cathy S Widom, Hang H Do, Kristin S Lynch, Jennifer J Manly
{"title":"Childhood Maltreatment and Dementia Risk Factors in Midlife: A Prospective Investigation.","authors":"Cathy S Widom, Hang H Do, Kristin S Lynch, Jennifer J Manly","doi":"10.2174/0115672050281539231222071355","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous studies have linked childhood adversities to dementia risk, yet most studies are cross-sectional in design and utilize retrospective self-reports to assess childhood experiences. These design characteristics make it difficult to establish temporal order and draw firm conclusions.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Using a longitudinal design, we sought to determine whether childhood maltreatment predicts dementia risk factors in middle adulthood.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Data have been obtained from a prospective cohort design study of children with documented cases of childhood maltreatment (ages 0-11 years at case identification) and demographically matched controls who were followed up and interviewed in middle adulthood. Outcomes were assessed through a medical examination and interview, and 807 of the cases that included blood collection at mean age 41. Dementia risk were investigated using 11 potentially modifiable risk factors.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to controls, individuals with histories of childhood maltreatment had a higher risk of low educational attainment, low social contact, smoking, and clinical depression, and a higher total number of dementia risk factors. In general, childhood maltreatment predicted a higher risk of dementia for females, males, and Black and White participants. Black maltreated participants had a greater risk for traumatic brain injury compared to Black controls. Physical abuse, sexual abuse, and neglect, each predicted a higher number of dementia risk factors in mid-life.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings provide evidence that childhood maltreatment increases the risk for dementia in mid-life and has a demonstrable impact lasting over 30 years. Reducing the prevalence of mid-life dementia risk factors could reduce the risk of later-life dementia.</p>","PeriodicalId":94309,"journal":{"name":"Current Alzheimer research","volume":" ","pages":"636-647"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Alzheimer research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/0115672050281539231222071355","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Previous studies have linked childhood adversities to dementia risk, yet most studies are cross-sectional in design and utilize retrospective self-reports to assess childhood experiences. These design characteristics make it difficult to establish temporal order and draw firm conclusions.

Objectives: Using a longitudinal design, we sought to determine whether childhood maltreatment predicts dementia risk factors in middle adulthood.

Methods: Data have been obtained from a prospective cohort design study of children with documented cases of childhood maltreatment (ages 0-11 years at case identification) and demographically matched controls who were followed up and interviewed in middle adulthood. Outcomes were assessed through a medical examination and interview, and 807 of the cases that included blood collection at mean age 41. Dementia risk were investigated using 11 potentially modifiable risk factors.

Results: Compared to controls, individuals with histories of childhood maltreatment had a higher risk of low educational attainment, low social contact, smoking, and clinical depression, and a higher total number of dementia risk factors. In general, childhood maltreatment predicted a higher risk of dementia for females, males, and Black and White participants. Black maltreated participants had a greater risk for traumatic brain injury compared to Black controls. Physical abuse, sexual abuse, and neglect, each predicted a higher number of dementia risk factors in mid-life.

Conclusion: These findings provide evidence that childhood maltreatment increases the risk for dementia in mid-life and has a demonstrable impact lasting over 30 years. Reducing the prevalence of mid-life dementia risk factors could reduce the risk of later-life dementia.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
童年虐待与中年痴呆症风险因素:一项前瞻性调查
背景:以往的研究将童年逆境与痴呆症风险联系在一起,但大多数研究都是横断面设计,并利用回顾性自我报告来评估童年经历。这些设计特点使得研究难以确定时间顺序并得出确切结论:我们采用纵向设计,试图确定童年虐待是否会预测中年痴呆症的风险因素:方法:我们从一项前瞻性队列设计研究中获得了数据,研究对象是有记录的儿童虐待病例(病例确定时年龄为 0-11 岁)和人口统计学上匹配的对照组,这些对照组在成年中期接受了随访和访谈。研究结果通过体检和访谈进行评估,其中807例病例在平均41岁时进行了采血,并利用11个潜在的可改变风险因素对痴呆症风险进行了调查:与对照组相比,有童年虐待史的人受教育程度低、社会接触少、吸烟和临床抑郁的风险更高,痴呆症风险因素的总数也更高。一般来说,女性、男性、黑人和白人受虐者患痴呆症的风险都较高。与黑人对照组相比,受过虐待的黑人参与者发生脑外伤的风险更高。身体虐待、性虐待和忽视都会增加中年痴呆症的风险因素:这些研究结果提供了证据,表明童年虐待会增加中年痴呆症的风险,并且会产生持续 30 多年的明显影响。降低中年痴呆症风险因素的发生率可以降低晚年痴呆症的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Discovery of Selective β-Secretase (BACE-1) Inhibitors by the Solid-Phase Synthesis of Small Molecular-sized Peptides. Preclinical Pharmacology of CX1837, a High-Impact Ampakine with an Improved Safety Margin: Implications for Treating Alzheimer's Disease and Ischemic Stroke. Prospective Memory in Mobile: Using Smartphone-Based Calendars to Rehabilitate Prospective Memory in Patients with Alzheimer's Disease. Tauopathy in AD: Therapeutic Potential of MARK-4. Age- and Genotype-Dependent Effects of Chronic Nicotine on Presenilin1/2 Double Knockout Mice: From Behavior to Molecular Pathways.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1