Development and Feasibility Testing of a Remote Support Application for Adherence to Home Exercise Programs: A Randomized Pilot Study.

IF 1.5 Progress in rehabilitation medicine Pub Date : 2023-12-28 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.2490/prm.20230045
Rufus A Adedoyin, John O Makinde, Adekola B Ademoyegun, Francis Fatoye, Chidozie E Mbada
{"title":"Development and Feasibility Testing of a Remote Support Application for Adherence to Home Exercise Programs: A Randomized Pilot Study.","authors":"Rufus A Adedoyin, John O Makinde, Adekola B Ademoyegun, Francis Fatoye, Chidozie E Mbada","doi":"10.2490/prm.20230045","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Poor adherence to home exercise programs (HEPs) is a significant barrier to continuity of care and eventual outcomes, thus requiring innovative mitigating approaches. This study aimed to develop and test the feasibility of a remote support application (RSA) designed to encourage adherence to HEPs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Using standard computer programing, an RSA with administrator and user interfaces was developed for mobile phone or tablet. Consenting patients receiving physiotherapy for musculoskeletal conditions (n=19) were randomly assigned into the experimental group (n=10) or the control group (n=9). The experimental group received their customized HEP reminders via the RSA, whereas the control group used conventional paper handouts for HEPs. Adherence to HEPs was assessed over 4 weeks. The feasibility of the RSA was assessed using the Mobile Application Rating Scale and System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaires. Data were summarized using descriptive and inferential statistics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The adherence rate of patients in experimental group was significantly higher than that of patients in the control group after 2 weeks [median diff.=-6.0, 95% confidence interval (CI): -8.0 to -5.0; U=5.00; Z=-3.304; P=0.001; r=0.75] and 4 weeks (median diff.=-7.0, 95% CI: -8.0 to -5.0; U=0; Z=-3.695; P<0.001; r=0.84) of intervention. The RSA had a mean SUS score of 82.53±9.04 (out of 100) and a mean app quality rating score of 75.95±4.98 (out of 95).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of an RSA to improve adherence to HEPs is feasible for patients with musculoskeletal conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":74584,"journal":{"name":"Progress in rehabilitation medicine","volume":"8 ","pages":"20230045"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10751247/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Progress in rehabilitation medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2490/prm.20230045","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Poor adherence to home exercise programs (HEPs) is a significant barrier to continuity of care and eventual outcomes, thus requiring innovative mitigating approaches. This study aimed to develop and test the feasibility of a remote support application (RSA) designed to encourage adherence to HEPs.

Methods: Using standard computer programing, an RSA with administrator and user interfaces was developed for mobile phone or tablet. Consenting patients receiving physiotherapy for musculoskeletal conditions (n=19) were randomly assigned into the experimental group (n=10) or the control group (n=9). The experimental group received their customized HEP reminders via the RSA, whereas the control group used conventional paper handouts for HEPs. Adherence to HEPs was assessed over 4 weeks. The feasibility of the RSA was assessed using the Mobile Application Rating Scale and System Usability Scale (SUS) questionnaires. Data were summarized using descriptive and inferential statistics.

Results: The adherence rate of patients in experimental group was significantly higher than that of patients in the control group after 2 weeks [median diff.=-6.0, 95% confidence interval (CI): -8.0 to -5.0; U=5.00; Z=-3.304; P=0.001; r=0.75] and 4 weeks (median diff.=-7.0, 95% CI: -8.0 to -5.0; U=0; Z=-3.695; P<0.001; r=0.84) of intervention. The RSA had a mean SUS score of 82.53±9.04 (out of 100) and a mean app quality rating score of 75.95±4.98 (out of 95).

Conclusions: The use of an RSA to improve adherence to HEPs is feasible for patients with musculoskeletal conditions.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
针对坚持家庭锻炼计划的远程支持应用程序的开发和可行性测试:随机试点研究。
目标:家庭锻炼计划(HEPs)的依从性差是影响护理连续性和最终疗效的一个重要障碍,因此需要创新的缓解方法。本研究旨在开发和测试远程支持应用程序(RSA)的可行性,该应用程序旨在鼓励人们坚持家庭锻炼计划:方法:使用标准的计算机编程,开发了一款带有管理员和用户界面的手机或平板电脑远程支持应用程序。经同意接受物理治疗的肌肉骨骼疾病患者(19 人)被随机分配到实验组(10 人)或对照组(9 人)。实验组通过 RSA 接收定制的 "健康教育计划 "提醒,而对照组则使用传统的纸质 "健康教育计划 "讲义。在 4 周的时间内对 HEP 的坚持情况进行了评估。使用移动应用评分量表和系统可用性量表 (SUS) 问卷对 RSA 的可行性进行了评估。数据采用描述性和推论性统计方法进行总结:结果:实验组患者两周后的依从率明显高于对照组患者[中位数差异=-6.0,95% 置信区间(CI):-8.0 至-5.0;U=5.00;Z=-3.304;P=0.001;r=0.75],四周后的依从率明显高于对照组患者[中位数差异=-7.0,95% 置信区间(CI):-8.0 至-5.0;U=0;Z=-3.695;P=0.001;r=0.75]:对于肌肉骨骼疾病患者来说,使用 RSA 来提高 HEPs 的依从性是可行的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Outpatient Cardiac Rehabilitation before and after Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation: A Case Report. Rehabilitation Management of Upper Limb Segmental Zoster Paresis Following Coronavirus 2019 Vaccination: A Case Report. Preoperative Functional Mobility as a Predictor of Exceeding the Planned Length of Hospital Stay after Lumbar Fusion Surgery for Spinal Stenosis. Toe Grip Strength Shows Stronger Associations with Falls than Knee Extension or Hand Grip in Older Adults: A 1-year Prospective Cohort Study. Prognostic Value of the Kihon Checklist in Older Cardiovascular Disease Patients.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1