What is the risk of overcollecting for translocation? An opportunistic assessment of a wingless grasshopper

IF 7.7 1区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION Conservation Letters Pub Date : 2023-12-31 DOI:10.1111/conl.12999
Michael R. Kearney, Hiromi Yagui, Ary A. Hoffmann, Ben L. Phillips
{"title":"What is the risk of overcollecting for translocation? An opportunistic assessment of a wingless grasshopper","authors":"Michael R. Kearney,&nbsp;Hiromi Yagui,&nbsp;Ary A. Hoffmann,&nbsp;Ben L. Phillips","doi":"10.1111/conl.12999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Translocation is an increasingly used tool in conservation management, but there is a risk that source populations are overcollected. The risk depends critically on the detection probability and the source population size. We quantified this risk for a wingless grasshopper population in a patch of remnant habitat in suburban Melbourne that was condemned to be cleared for housing development. We collected ∼2000 grasshoppers in five samples spread over 1 month and used the results to estimate the initial population size (∼3400) with high confidence. Despite our perception of substantially depleting the population, we removed only an estimated 60%, and this relatively high fecundity (∼50 eggs per lifetime) annual species had recovered by the following year to near its original density. Wild-to-wild translocation is likely to be a low-cost and effective strategy in the conservation of many invertebrates, and our findings highlight the feasibility of using natural source populations.</p>","PeriodicalId":157,"journal":{"name":"Conservation Letters","volume":"17 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/conl.12999","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Conservation Letters","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/conl.12999","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Translocation is an increasingly used tool in conservation management, but there is a risk that source populations are overcollected. The risk depends critically on the detection probability and the source population size. We quantified this risk for a wingless grasshopper population in a patch of remnant habitat in suburban Melbourne that was condemned to be cleared for housing development. We collected ∼2000 grasshoppers in five samples spread over 1 month and used the results to estimate the initial population size (∼3400) with high confidence. Despite our perception of substantially depleting the population, we removed only an estimated 60%, and this relatively high fecundity (∼50 eggs per lifetime) annual species had recovered by the following year to near its original density. Wild-to-wild translocation is likely to be a low-cost and effective strategy in the conservation of many invertebrates, and our findings highlight the feasibility of using natural source populations.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
过度采集进行转地的风险有多大?对无翅蚱蜢的机会主义评估
迁地是保护管理中越来越常用的一种工具,但也存在过度采集源种群的风险。这种风险主要取决于检测概率和源种群大小。我们对墨尔本郊区一片残留栖息地中的无翅蚱蜢种群的这种风险进行了量化。我们在 1 个月内采集了 5 个样本中的 2000 ∼ 2000 只蚱蜢,并利用采集结果以较高的置信度估计了初始种群数量(300 ∼ 300 只)。尽管我们认为种群数量会大幅减少,但我们只移除了约60%,而且这种繁殖力相对较高(一生产卵50∼50枚)的一年生物种在第二年已恢复到接近其原始密度。在保护许多无脊椎动物的过程中,野外到野外的迁移可能是一种低成本且有效的策略,我们的研究结果突显了利用自然种群的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Conservation Letters
Conservation Letters BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION-
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
2.40%
发文量
70
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Conservation Letters is a reputable scientific journal that is devoted to the publication of both empirical and theoretical research that has important implications for the conservation of biological diversity. The journal warmly invites submissions from various disciplines within the biological and social sciences, with a particular interest in interdisciplinary work. The primary aim is to advance both pragmatic conservation objectives and scientific knowledge. Manuscripts are subject to a rapid communication schedule, therefore they should address current and relevant topics. Research articles should effectively communicate the significance of their findings in relation to conservation policy and practice.
期刊最新文献
How Do We Identify Anthropogenic Allee Effects in the Wildlife Trade? Hunting for Sustainability: Indigenous Stewardship in the Cofán Territory of Zábalo Collective PES Contracts Can Motivate Institutional Creation to Conserve Forests: Experimental Evidence First Evidence of Individual Sharks Involved in Multiple Predatory Bites on People Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1