Could agroforestry restore ecosystem services in arid lands? An analysis through the weight of the evidence approach

IF 2 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRONOMY Agroforestry Systems Pub Date : 2023-12-27 DOI:10.1007/s10457-023-00927-y
F. M. Farinaccio, E. Ceccon, D. R. Pérez
{"title":"Could agroforestry restore ecosystem services in arid lands? An analysis through the weight of the evidence approach","authors":"F. M. Farinaccio, E. Ceccon, D. R. Pérez","doi":"10.1007/s10457-023-00927-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Degradation is limiting the ability of arid lands to provide ecosystem services. Agroforestry Systems can supply several of these ecosystem services. In this context, we carried out a systematic review of literature, to find the ecosystem services provided by Agroforestry Systems in arid lands irrigated by rainwater harvesting systems in worldwide. The ecosystem services most mentioned (soil quality, productivity increase, carbon sequestration, biodiversity conservation, cultural values, water regulation and purification, and pollination), that were provided by the four Agroforestry Systems (protein banks, intercropping, windbreaks and homegardens) were used to apply the Weight of Evidence Approach. The regions where Agroforestry Systems practices were carried out, the species most used and their multipurpose were also evaluated. Most of the experiences were documented in Africa (42%) and Asia (37%). We registered 82 species, being the Fabaceae and Chenopodiaceae families were the most used. These species (49% shrubs) were mainly integrated in Agroforestry Systems by homegardens (43%), intercropping (40%), and windbreaks (23%). The most evaluated species uses were medicine (58%), food (28%), and forage (27%). We found several positive evidence of Agroforestry Systems in all ecosystem services evaluated. We also found some evidence that Agroforestry Systems can cause drawbacks such as salinization, or species invasion.</p>","PeriodicalId":7610,"journal":{"name":"Agroforestry Systems","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agroforestry Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-023-00927-y","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Degradation is limiting the ability of arid lands to provide ecosystem services. Agroforestry Systems can supply several of these ecosystem services. In this context, we carried out a systematic review of literature, to find the ecosystem services provided by Agroforestry Systems in arid lands irrigated by rainwater harvesting systems in worldwide. The ecosystem services most mentioned (soil quality, productivity increase, carbon sequestration, biodiversity conservation, cultural values, water regulation and purification, and pollination), that were provided by the four Agroforestry Systems (protein banks, intercropping, windbreaks and homegardens) were used to apply the Weight of Evidence Approach. The regions where Agroforestry Systems practices were carried out, the species most used and their multipurpose were also evaluated. Most of the experiences were documented in Africa (42%) and Asia (37%). We registered 82 species, being the Fabaceae and Chenopodiaceae families were the most used. These species (49% shrubs) were mainly integrated in Agroforestry Systems by homegardens (43%), intercropping (40%), and windbreaks (23%). The most evaluated species uses were medicine (58%), food (28%), and forage (27%). We found several positive evidence of Agroforestry Systems in all ecosystem services evaluated. We also found some evidence that Agroforestry Systems can cause drawbacks such as salinization, or species invasion.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
农林业能否恢复干旱地区的生态系统服务?通过证据权重法进行分析
退化限制了干旱土地提供生态系统服务的能力。农林系统可以提供其中几种生态系统服务。在此背景下,我们对文献进行了系统性的回顾,以了解农林系统在全球雨水收集系统灌溉的干旱土地上提供的生态系统服务。四种农林系统(蛋白库、间作、防风林和家庭菜园)所提供的生态系统服务(土壤质量、生产力提高、碳固存、生物多样性保护、文化价值、水调节和净化以及授粉)中被提及最多,我们采用了 "证据权重法"。还对开展农林系统实践的地区、最常用的物种及其多用途进行了评估。大多数经验都记录在非洲(42%)和亚洲(37%)。我们登记了 82 个物种,其中使用最多的是豆科和藜科植物。这些物种(49% 为灌木)主要通过家庭菜园(43%)、间作(40%)和防风林(23%)被纳入农林系统。评估最多的物种用途是药物(58%)、食物(28%)和饲料(27%)。我们在所有评估的生态系统服务中都发现了农林系统的一些积极证据。我们还发现一些证据表明,农林系统可能导致盐碱化或物种入侵等弊端。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Agroforestry Systems
Agroforestry Systems 农林科学-林学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
78
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Agroforestry Systems is an international scientific journal that publishes results of novel, high impact original research, critical reviews and short communications on any aspect of agroforestry. The journal particularly encourages contributions that demonstrate the role of agroforestry in providing commodity as well non-commodity benefits such as ecosystem services. Papers dealing with both biophysical and socioeconomic aspects are welcome. These include results of investigations of a fundamental or applied nature dealing with integrated systems involving trees and crops and/or livestock. Manuscripts that are purely descriptive in nature or confirmatory in nature of well-established findings, and with limited international scope are discouraged. To be acceptable for publication, the information presented must be relevant to a context wider than the specific location where the study was undertaken, and provide new insight or make a significant contribution to the agroforestry knowledge base
期刊最新文献
Trees and grass buffers impact on soil carbon in an agroforestry alleycropping watershed Vegetation structure and bird diversity in silvopastoral systems of the Amazonian piedmont of Colombia Basal area as a strategic indicator for forest component management in silvopastoral systems: insights from long-term experiments Direct and indirect estimations of aerial forage net primary productivity in Nothofagus antarctica forests under silvopastoral systems in Northwest of Chubut, Argentina Botanical composition gradients in silvopastoral systems on temperate native grasslands of Uruguay
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1