Subjective assessment of women's economic welfare in public sector organizations of Mardan, Northern Pakistan

Nazia Begum, Muhammad Tariq, Noor Jehan, Farah Khan
{"title":"Subjective assessment of women's economic welfare in public sector organizations of Mardan, Northern Pakistan","authors":"Nazia Begum, Muhammad Tariq, Noor Jehan, Farah Khan","doi":"10.1108/ijse-04-2023-0246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<h3>Purpose</h3>\n<p>The measurement of women's economic welfare and exploring its underlying factors have been undervalued in the context of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. This study addressed this gap by focusing on assessing women's subjective economic welfare and its socioeconomic and cultural determinants in the education and health sectors within Mardan, Northern Pakistan.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Design/methodology/approach</h3>\n<p>The study used stratified random sampling techniques for the selection of sample respondents and collected data through a well-structured questionnaire. To measure women’s economic welfare, the study utilizes Lorenz curves, the Gini index, the Sen Social Welfare function and an individual's gross monthly income. Furthermore, the ordinary least squares method was utilized to analyze the determinants of economic welfare.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Findings</h3>\n<p>The findings show greater income inequality and a lower welfare level for women in the education sector compared to the health sector. Likewise, the study identifies several key determinants, such as age, educational qualification, job experience, respect for working women, outside and work-place problems and the suffering of family members of working women for their economic well-being.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Originality/value</h3>\n<p>This study makes valuable contributions to the literature by focusing on the cultural perspective of Pakhtun women in Mardan and providing a context-specific understanding of subjective economic welfare. Additionally, the authors collected first-hand data, which gave an original outlook on working women's current economic welfare level. Furthermore, this study undertakes a comparative analysis of working women's welfare in the health and education sectors. This comparison offers a more accurate portrayal of the challenges and opportunities specific to these occupations.</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->\n<h3>Peer review</h3>\n<p>The peer-review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/IJSE-04-2023-0246</p><!--/ Abstract__block -->","PeriodicalId":47714,"journal":{"name":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ECONOMICS","volume":"66 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ECONOMICS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijse-04-2023-0246","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

The measurement of women's economic welfare and exploring its underlying factors have been undervalued in the context of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, Pakistan. This study addressed this gap by focusing on assessing women's subjective economic welfare and its socioeconomic and cultural determinants in the education and health sectors within Mardan, Northern Pakistan.

Design/methodology/approach

The study used stratified random sampling techniques for the selection of sample respondents and collected data through a well-structured questionnaire. To measure women’s economic welfare, the study utilizes Lorenz curves, the Gini index, the Sen Social Welfare function and an individual's gross monthly income. Furthermore, the ordinary least squares method was utilized to analyze the determinants of economic welfare.

Findings

The findings show greater income inequality and a lower welfare level for women in the education sector compared to the health sector. Likewise, the study identifies several key determinants, such as age, educational qualification, job experience, respect for working women, outside and work-place problems and the suffering of family members of working women for their economic well-being.

Originality/value

This study makes valuable contributions to the literature by focusing on the cultural perspective of Pakhtun women in Mardan and providing a context-specific understanding of subjective economic welfare. Additionally, the authors collected first-hand data, which gave an original outlook on working women's current economic welfare level. Furthermore, this study undertakes a comparative analysis of working women's welfare in the health and education sectors. This comparison offers a more accurate portrayal of the challenges and opportunities specific to these occupations.

Peer review

The peer-review history for this article is available at: https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/IJSE-04-2023-0246

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
对巴基斯坦北部马尔丹公共部门组织中妇女经济福利的主观评估
目的在巴基斯坦开伯尔巴图克瓦省,对妇女经济福利的衡量及其潜在因素的探索一直未得到重视。本研究通过重点评估巴基斯坦北部马尔丹地区教育和卫生部门中妇女的主观经济福利及其社会经济和文化决定因素,弥补了这一空白。为了衡量妇女的经济福利,研究采用了洛伦兹曲线、基尼指数、森社会福利函数和个人月总收入。研究结果表明,与卫生部门相比,教育部门妇女的收入不平等程度更高,福利水平更低。同样,研究还确定了几个关键的决定因素,如年龄、学历、工作经验、对职业女性的尊重、外部和工作场所问题以及职业女性家庭成员对其经济福利的影响。此外,作者还收集了第一手数据,从而对职业妇女当前的经济福利水平有了新的认识。此外,本研究还对职业妇女在卫生和教育部门的福利进行了比较分析。同行评议本文的同行评议历史见:https://publons.com/publon/10.1108/IJSE-04-2023-0246。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
相关文献
Salty Roots, Stunted Roots
IF 56.9 1区 综合性期刊SciencePub Date : 2012-10-19 DOI: 10.1126/SCIENCE.338.6105.307-A
P. Hines
Souffleries roots-pompes roots-II. (Roots blowers-roots pumps-II.)
IF 4 2区 材料科学VacuumPub Date : 1962-09-01 DOI: 10.1016/0042-207X(62)90579-1
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
5.30%
发文量
98
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Social Economics publishes original and peer-reviewed theoretical and empirical research in the field of social economics. Its focus is on the examination and analysis of the interaction between economic activity, individuals and communities. Social economics focuses on the relationship between social action and economies, and examines how social and ethical norms influence the behaviour of economic agents. It is inescapably normative and focuses on needs, rather than wants or preferences, and considers the wellbeing of individuals in communities: it accepts the possibility of a common good rather than conceiving of communities as merely aggregates of individual preferences and the problems of economics as coordinating those preferences. Therefore, contributions are invited which analyse and discuss well-being, welfare, the nature of the good society, governance and social policy, social and economic justice, social and individual economic motivation, and the associated normative and ethical implications of these as they express themselves in, for example, issues concerning the environment, labour and work, education, the role of families and women, inequality and poverty, health and human development.
期刊最新文献
Determinants of financial well-being for emerging adults: the moderating effect of financial risk tolerance The correlations between business ethics rules, talented human resource supply chain management and managing SMEs ethics: fresh insight from middle Eastern countries The role of monetary and non-monetary shocks in children’s schooling in the presence of credit market imperfection in Cameroon The impact of excess CSR expenditure on firm value and dividend payout in India: an analysis using firm age and size dynamics Envisaging Indian farmers' desires from agricultural index insurance integrating rank sum weighting method and MoSCoW technique: an approach to requirements prioritization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1