Physiological myocardial 18F-FDG uptake pattern in oncologic PET/CT: comparison with findings in cardiac sarcoidosis.

Takashi Norikane, Yuka Yamamoto, Yasukage Takami, Katsuya Mitamura, Takuya Kobata, Yukito Maeda, Takahisa Noma, Yoshihiro Nishiyama
{"title":"Physiological myocardial <sup>18</sup>F-FDG uptake pattern in oncologic PET/CT: comparison with findings in cardiac sarcoidosis.","authors":"Takashi Norikane, Yuka Yamamoto, Yasukage Takami, Katsuya Mitamura, Takuya Kobata, Yukito Maeda, Takahisa Noma, Yoshihiro Nishiyama","doi":"10.22038/AOJNMB.2023.70254.1490","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Physiological myocardial <sup>18</sup>F-fluorodeoxyglucose (<sup>18</sup>F-FDG) uptake in oncologic positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) is commonly observed with multiple variations under clinical fasting conditions. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate physiological myocardial <sup>18</sup>F-FDG uptake pattern by comparing with the results in cardiac sarcoidosis.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 174 examinations in 174 patients without cardiac disease and 27 examinations in 17 patients with cardiac sarcoidosis were performed. The polar map images generated from <sup>18</sup>F-FDG PET/CT data were visually assessed as \"basal-ring,\" \"focal,\" and \"focal on diffuse\" patterns. Semi-quantitative analysis was also performed using the regional relative <sup>18</sup>F-FDG uptake (% uptake).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>On visual analysis, the \"focal on diffuse\" pattern was the most common in both examinations (43% and 59%, respectively). The physiological % uptake in the lateral and basal septal walls tended to be higher. Subgroup analysis showed significantly higher uptake in the mid-wall and left circumflex territory. In cardiac sarcoidosis patients, there was a significant difference only between segments 2 and 15 (p=0.04). No significant differences were observed between the base-mid-apical territory and coronary artery branch territory.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>High <sup>18</sup>F-FDG uptake in the basal septal walls is likely to be observed as both physiological uptake in patients without cardiac disease and pathological uptake in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis.</p>","PeriodicalId":8503,"journal":{"name":"Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10757061/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/AOJNMB.2023.70254.1490","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Physiological myocardial 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) uptake in oncologic positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) is commonly observed with multiple variations under clinical fasting conditions. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate physiological myocardial 18F-FDG uptake pattern by comparing with the results in cardiac sarcoidosis.

Methods: A total of 174 examinations in 174 patients without cardiac disease and 27 examinations in 17 patients with cardiac sarcoidosis were performed. The polar map images generated from 18F-FDG PET/CT data were visually assessed as "basal-ring," "focal," and "focal on diffuse" patterns. Semi-quantitative analysis was also performed using the regional relative 18F-FDG uptake (% uptake).

Results: On visual analysis, the "focal on diffuse" pattern was the most common in both examinations (43% and 59%, respectively). The physiological % uptake in the lateral and basal septal walls tended to be higher. Subgroup analysis showed significantly higher uptake in the mid-wall and left circumflex territory. In cardiac sarcoidosis patients, there was a significant difference only between segments 2 and 15 (p=0.04). No significant differences were observed between the base-mid-apical territory and coronary artery branch territory.

Conclusion: High 18F-FDG uptake in the basal septal walls is likely to be observed as both physiological uptake in patients without cardiac disease and pathological uptake in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肿瘤 PET/CT 中的生理性心肌 18F-FDG 摄取模式:与心脏肉样瘤病研究结果的比较。
目的:肿瘤正电子发射断层扫描(PET)/计算机断层扫描(CT)中的生理性心肌18F-氟脱氧葡萄糖(18F-FDG)摄取在临床空腹条件下通常会出现多种变化。本研究旨在通过与心脏肉样瘤病的结果进行比较,评估生理性心肌 18F-FDG 摄取模式:方法:共对 174 名无心脏病患者进行了 174 次检查,对 17 名心脏肉样瘤病患者进行了 27 次检查。根据 18F-FDG PET/CT 数据生成的极坐标图图像被目测为 "基底环"、"局灶 "和 "弥漫局灶 "模式。此外,还使用区域相对 18F-FDG 摄取率(摄取百分比)进行了半定量分析:结果:根据肉眼分析,"弥漫上有病灶 "模式在两次检查中最常见(分别为 43% 和 59%)。室间隔侧壁和基底壁的生理性摄取率往往较高。亚组分析显示,室间隔中壁和左心包的摄取率明显较高。在心脏肉样瘤病患者中,只有第 2 节段和第 15 节段之间存在显著差异(P=0.04)。基底中尖区和冠状动脉分支区之间无明显差异:结论:室间隔基底壁的18F-FDG摄取量较高,这既可能是无心脏病患者的生理性摄取,也可能是心脏肉样瘤病患者的病理性摄取。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology
Asia Oceania Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Biology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
28
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
18F-FDG PET/CT imaging of IgG4-producing MALT lymphoma with multiple site involvement. 99mTc-Sn-colloid SPECT/CT in thoracic splenosis after esophageal cancer surgery. A practical method for assessing quantitative scanner accuracy with long-lived radionuclides: The ARTnet insert. Assessment of awareness and knowledge regarding nuclear medicine and appropriate use of Nuclear medicine modalities, among medical students and faculty members in two academic medical institutes in North India: A Cross sectional Study. Comparison between 18F-FDG PET/CT and diffusion-weighted imaging in detection of invasive ductal breast carcinoma.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1