Measurement Invariance of the Hospice Quality of Life Index-14 in Lung Cancer and Nonlung Cancer Patients Admitted to Hospice.

IF 0.7 Q4 NURSING Journal of nursing measurement Pub Date : 2024-10-24 DOI:10.1891/JNM-2022-0110
Li-Ting H Longcoy, Joshua Longcoy, Chun-Yi Tai, Ardith Z Doorenbos, Jason W Beckstead
{"title":"Measurement Invariance of the Hospice Quality of Life Index-14 in Lung Cancer and Nonlung Cancer Patients Admitted to Hospice.","authors":"Li-Ting H Longcoy, Joshua Longcoy, Chun-Yi Tai, Ardith Z Doorenbos, Jason W Beckstead","doi":"10.1891/JNM-2022-0110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background and Purpose:</b> Establishing measurement invariance (MI) is important in the questionnaire validation process. This study examined the MI of the Hospice Quality of Life Index-14 (HQLI-14) when comparing hospice patients with lung cancer and those with nonlung cancers. <b>Methods:</b> The HQLI-14 contains 14 items to measure multidimensional concepts of quality of life. A series of confirmatory factor analyses were performed to test configural, metric, and scalar invariance. <b>Results:</b> The MI of the HQLI-14 was supported by increasing equality constraints on item parameters between groups. Although the configural and metric invariances were both supported, one item regarding breathlessness was noninvariant between the groups with lung and nonlung cancers. <b>Conclusions:</b> The HQLI-14 shows early evidence of meeting the requirements for configural, metric, and partial scalar invariance. It may be used to make meaningful comparisons between patients with lung cancer and nonlung cancers.</p>","PeriodicalId":16585,"journal":{"name":"Journal of nursing measurement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of nursing measurement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1891/JNM-2022-0110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Establishing measurement invariance (MI) is important in the questionnaire validation process. This study examined the MI of the Hospice Quality of Life Index-14 (HQLI-14) when comparing hospice patients with lung cancer and those with nonlung cancers. Methods: The HQLI-14 contains 14 items to measure multidimensional concepts of quality of life. A series of confirmatory factor analyses were performed to test configural, metric, and scalar invariance. Results: The MI of the HQLI-14 was supported by increasing equality constraints on item parameters between groups. Although the configural and metric invariances were both supported, one item regarding breathlessness was noninvariant between the groups with lung and nonlung cancers. Conclusions: The HQLI-14 shows early evidence of meeting the requirements for configural, metric, and partial scalar invariance. It may be used to make meaningful comparisons between patients with lung cancer and nonlung cancers.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
接受安宁疗护的肺癌和非肺癌患者的安宁疗护生活质量指数-14测量不变性。
背景和目的:在问卷验证过程中,建立测量不变性(MI)非常重要。本研究在比较安宁疗护肺癌患者和非肺癌患者时,检验了安宁疗护生活质量指数-14(HQLI-14)的测量不变性。研究方法HQLI-14 包含 14 个项目,用于测量生活质量的多维概念。进行了一系列确证因子分析,以检验构型、度量和标度的不变量。结果显示组间项目参数的平等性约束条件不断增加,支持了 HQLI-14 的多元智能。虽然构型不变量和度量不变量都得到了支持,但有一个关于呼吸困难的项目在肺癌组和非肺癌组之间不存在不变量。结论:HQLI-14 显示出满足构型、度量和部分标度不变性要求的早期证据。它可用于对肺癌和非肺癌患者进行有意义的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊介绍: The Journal of Nursing Measurement specifically addresses instrumentation in nursing. It serves as a prime forum for disseminating information on instruments, tools, approaches, and procedures developed or utilized for measuring variables in nursing research, practice, and education. Particular emphasis is placed on evidence for the reliability and validity or sensitivity and specificity of such instruments. The journal includes innovative discussions of theories, principles, practices, and issues relevant to nursing measurement.
期刊最新文献
Validity and Reliability of the Persian Version of the Scale of the Assessment of Self-Care Behaviors With Arteriovenous Fistula in Patients on Hemodialysis. Actigraphy: An Adjunctive Method to Measure Irritability in Opioid-Exposed Newborns. Development and Psychometric Properties of the Brain Drain Questionnaire for Nurses. Validation of the Nursing Student Peripheral Intravenous Catheter Insertion Self-Confidence Scale. Use of the Rasch Model for Fit Statistics and Rating Scale Diagnosis for the Student Perception Appraisal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1