Optimal timing of surgical intervention for penile fracture: a narrative review of the modern literature.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY Sexual medicine reviews Pub Date : 2024-03-26 DOI:10.1093/sxmrev/qead056
Ari P Bernstein, Nader Shayegh, Javier Piraino, Matthew Ziegelmann
{"title":"Optimal timing of surgical intervention for penile fracture: a narrative review of the modern literature.","authors":"Ari P Bernstein, Nader Shayegh, Javier Piraino, Matthew Ziegelmann","doi":"10.1093/sxmrev/qead056","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Penile fracture is traditionally considered a surgical emergency warranting immediate repair with the goal to maximize long-term erectile function and minimize penile curvature. Nonetheless, consensus on the optimal timing for penile fracture repair remains to be elucidated and is the subject of continued research efforts.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>This review aims to summarize the contemporary literature pertaining to optimal timing of penile fracture repair and associated outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We queried PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar for relevant articles published between 2012 and 2022 to evaluate the most recent literature on the queried topic of early vs delayed intervention for penile fracture. All examined review articles were published within the last decade but may have included analyses of studies published prior to 2012. Reference lists of articles and reviews were manually reviewed to identify additional relevant articles.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 16 articles that met inclusion criteria: 12 primary articles and 4 systematic reviews or meta-analyses. Importantly, definitions of early and delayed intervention varied greatly among studies, making quantitative comparison challenging. In summary, 6 primary studies and 2 systematic review articles favored early intervention. There were also 6 primary studies and 2 systematic review articles suggesting equivocal outcomes between early and delayed repair. No articles demonstrated improved outcomes with delayed repair relative to early intervention.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Surgical intervention for penile fracture remains the gold standard, with superior long-term sexual and functional outcomes when compared with conservative management. Optimal timing of penile fracture repair remains to be elucidated with data limited by low incidence, resulting in small case series and a lack of randomized controlled trials. Nonetheless, recent data suggest that a brief delay in surgical intervention for patients presenting with penile fractures does not affect long-term sexual and functional outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":21813,"journal":{"name":"Sexual medicine reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sexual medicine reviews","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/sxmrev/qead056","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Penile fracture is traditionally considered a surgical emergency warranting immediate repair with the goal to maximize long-term erectile function and minimize penile curvature. Nonetheless, consensus on the optimal timing for penile fracture repair remains to be elucidated and is the subject of continued research efforts.

Objectives: This review aims to summarize the contemporary literature pertaining to optimal timing of penile fracture repair and associated outcomes.

Methods: We queried PubMed/MEDLINE and Google Scholar for relevant articles published between 2012 and 2022 to evaluate the most recent literature on the queried topic of early vs delayed intervention for penile fracture. All examined review articles were published within the last decade but may have included analyses of studies published prior to 2012. Reference lists of articles and reviews were manually reviewed to identify additional relevant articles.

Results: We identified 16 articles that met inclusion criteria: 12 primary articles and 4 systematic reviews or meta-analyses. Importantly, definitions of early and delayed intervention varied greatly among studies, making quantitative comparison challenging. In summary, 6 primary studies and 2 systematic review articles favored early intervention. There were also 6 primary studies and 2 systematic review articles suggesting equivocal outcomes between early and delayed repair. No articles demonstrated improved outcomes with delayed repair relative to early intervention.

Conclusion: Surgical intervention for penile fracture remains the gold standard, with superior long-term sexual and functional outcomes when compared with conservative management. Optimal timing of penile fracture repair remains to be elucidated with data limited by low incidence, resulting in small case series and a lack of randomized controlled trials. Nonetheless, recent data suggest that a brief delay in surgical intervention for patients presenting with penile fractures does not affect long-term sexual and functional outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阴茎骨折手术治疗的最佳时机:现代文献综述。
导言:阴茎骨折历来被视为外科急症,需要立即进行修复,目的是最大限度地提高阴茎的长期勃起功能,减少阴茎弯曲。然而,关于阴茎骨折最佳修复时机的共识仍有待澄清,这也是持续研究的主题:本综述旨在总结与阴茎骨折修复最佳时机及相关结果有关的当代文献:我们在PubMed/MEDLINE和谷歌学术上搜索了2012年至2022年间发表的相关文章,以评估有关阴茎骨折早期干预与延迟干预这一主题的最新文献。所有受检的综述文章均发表于过去十年间,但可能包含对2012年之前发表的研究的分析。我们对文章和综述的参考文献列表进行了人工审核,以确定更多相关文章:我们确定了 16 篇符合纳入标准的文章:结果:我们发现了 16 篇符合纳入标准的文章:12 篇主要文章和 4 篇系统综述或荟萃分析。重要的是,不同研究对早期干预和延迟干预的定义差异很大,因此进行定量比较具有挑战性。总之,6 项主要研究和 2 篇系统综述文章倾向于早期干预。还有 6 项主要研究和 2 篇系统综述文章表明,早期和延迟修复的结果并不一致。没有一篇文章显示延迟修复的结果优于早期干预:结论:阴茎骨折的手术治疗仍然是金标准,与保守治疗相比,手术治疗的长期性和功能性疗效更佳。阴茎骨折修复的最佳时机仍有待阐明,由于发病率低,数据有限,导致病例数较少,且缺乏随机对照试验。不过,最近的数据表明,阴茎骨折患者手术治疗的短暂延迟不会影响长期的性功能和功能预后。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sexual medicine reviews
Sexual medicine reviews UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY-
CiteScore
7.60
自引率
8.30%
发文量
5
期刊最新文献
Is sexual function impaired in patients with primary headaches? A systematic review of observational studies. Erectile dysfunction as a holistic indicator of well-being: a narrative review. Analysis of evidence on nutraceutical interventions for Peyronie's disease: a guideline-based critical review. Sexual well-being among partnered adults and couples over 60: a scoping review. Beyond the discomfort: understanding and managing sexual pain in women, a comprehensive case-based discussion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1