Structural Equation Modeling Analysis on Associations of Moral Distress and Dimensions of Organizational Culture in Healthcare: A Cross-Sectional Study of Healthcare Professionals.

Q1 Arts and Humanities AJOB Empirical Bioethics Pub Date : 2024-04-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-02 DOI:10.1080/23294515.2023.2297922
Tessy A Thomas, Shelley Kumar, F Daniel Davis, Peter Boedeker, Satid Thammasitboon
{"title":"Structural Equation Modeling Analysis on Associations of Moral Distress and Dimensions of Organizational Culture in Healthcare: A Cross-Sectional Study of Healthcare Professionals.","authors":"Tessy A Thomas, Shelley Kumar, F Daniel Davis, Peter Boedeker, Satid Thammasitboon","doi":"10.1080/23294515.2023.2297922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Moral distress is a complex phenomenon experienced by healthcare professionals. This study examined the relationships between key dimensions of Organizational Culture in Healthcare (OCHC)-perceived psychological safety, ethical climate, patient safety-and healthcare professionals' perception of moral distress.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Cross-sectional survey.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Pediatric and adult critical care medicine, and adult hospital medicine healthcare professionals in the United States.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Physicians (<i>n</i> = 260), nurses (<i>n</i> = 256), and advanced practice providers (<i>n</i> = 110) participated in the study.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Three dimensions of OCHC were measured using validated questionnaires: Olson's Hospital Ethical Climate Survey, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Patient Safety Culture Survey, and Edmondson's Team Psychological Safety Survey. The perception of moral distress was measured using the Moral Distress Amidst a Pandemic Survey. The hypothesized relationships between various dimensions were tested with structural equation modeling (SEM).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Adequate model fit was achieved in the SEM: a root-mean-square error of approximation =0.072 (90% CI 0.069 to 0.075), standardized root mean square residual = 0.056, and comparative fit index =0.926. Perceived psychological safety (β= -0.357, <i>p</i> <.001) and patient safety culture (β = -0.428, <i>p</i><.001) were negatively related to moral distress experience. There was no significant association between ethical climate and moral distress (β = 0.106, <i>p</i> = 0.319). Ethical Climate, however, was highly correlated with Patient Safety Culture (factor correlation= 0.82).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We used structural equation model to test a theoretical model of multi-dimensional organizational culture and healthcare climate (OCHC) and moral distress.Significant associations were found, supporting mitigating strategies to optimize psychological safety and patient safety culture to address moral distress among healthcare professionals. Future initiatives and studies should account for key dimensions of OCHC with multi-pronged targets to preserve the moral well-being of individuals, teams, and organizations.</p>","PeriodicalId":38118,"journal":{"name":"AJOB Empirical Bioethics","volume":" ","pages":"120-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AJOB Empirical Bioethics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2023.2297922","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Moral distress is a complex phenomenon experienced by healthcare professionals. This study examined the relationships between key dimensions of Organizational Culture in Healthcare (OCHC)-perceived psychological safety, ethical climate, patient safety-and healthcare professionals' perception of moral distress.

Design: Cross-sectional survey.

Setting: Pediatric and adult critical care medicine, and adult hospital medicine healthcare professionals in the United States.

Participants: Physicians (n = 260), nurses (n = 256), and advanced practice providers (n = 110) participated in the study.

Main outcome measures: Three dimensions of OCHC were measured using validated questionnaires: Olson's Hospital Ethical Climate Survey, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality's Patient Safety Culture Survey, and Edmondson's Team Psychological Safety Survey. The perception of moral distress was measured using the Moral Distress Amidst a Pandemic Survey. The hypothesized relationships between various dimensions were tested with structural equation modeling (SEM).

Results: Adequate model fit was achieved in the SEM: a root-mean-square error of approximation =0.072 (90% CI 0.069 to 0.075), standardized root mean square residual = 0.056, and comparative fit index =0.926. Perceived psychological safety (β= -0.357, p <.001) and patient safety culture (β = -0.428, p<.001) were negatively related to moral distress experience. There was no significant association between ethical climate and moral distress (β = 0.106, p = 0.319). Ethical Climate, however, was highly correlated with Patient Safety Culture (factor correlation= 0.82).

Conclusions: We used structural equation model to test a theoretical model of multi-dimensional organizational culture and healthcare climate (OCHC) and moral distress.Significant associations were found, supporting mitigating strategies to optimize psychological safety and patient safety culture to address moral distress among healthcare professionals. Future initiatives and studies should account for key dimensions of OCHC with multi-pronged targets to preserve the moral well-being of individuals, teams, and organizations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗保健领域道德压力与组织文化相关性的结构方程模型分析:医疗保健专业人员横断面研究》。
目的:道德困扰是医护人员经历的一种复杂现象。本研究探讨了医疗保健组织文化(OCHC)的主要维度--心理安全感、伦理氛围、患者安全感--与医疗保健专业人员的道德困扰感知之间的关系:设计:横断面调查:调查对象:美国儿科和成人重症医学以及成人医院医学医护人员:主要结果测量:主要结果测量:使用经过验证的问卷对医院伦理环境的三个方面进行测量:奥尔森医院伦理氛围调查、医疗保健研究与质量机构患者安全文化调查和埃德蒙森团队心理安全调查。道德压力感则通过 "大流行病中的道德压力感调查 "进行测量。通过结构方程模型(SEM)检验了各维度之间的假设关系:结构方程模型达到了充分的拟合:均方根近似误差=0.072(90% CI 0.069 至 0.075),标准化均方根残差=0.056,比较拟合指数=0.926。心理安全感(β= -0.357,pp = 0.319)。然而,伦理氛围与患者安全文化高度相关(因子相关性= 0.82):我们使用结构方程模型检验了多维组织文化和医疗氛围(OCHC)与道德困扰的理论模型,结果发现两者之间存在显著关联,支持优化心理安全和患者安全文化的缓解策略,以解决医护人员的道德困扰。未来的倡议和研究应考虑组织文化和医疗氛围的关键维度,多管齐下,以维护个人、团队和组织的道德福祉。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AJOB Empirical Bioethics
AJOB Empirical Bioethics Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Animals is "Still Genetics": Perspectives of Genome Scientists and Policymakers on Animal and Human Enhancement. Associations Between the Legalization and Implementation of Medical Aid in Dying and Suicide Rates in the United States. Ethics Consultation in U.S. Pediatric Hospitals: Adherence to National Practice Standards. Monitored and Cared for at Home? Privacy Concerns When Using Smart Home Health Technologies to Care for Older Persons. Advance Medical Decision-Making Differs Across First- and Third-Person Perspectives.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1