Treatment practice of vasospasm during endovascular thrombectomy: an international survey.

IF 2.6 1区 医学 Journal of Investigative Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-05 DOI:10.1136/svn-2023-002788
Jessica Jesser, Thanh Nguyen, Adam A Dmytriw, Hiroshi Yamagami, Zhongrong Miao, Louisa Johanna Sommer, Andrea Stockero, Johannes Alex Rolf Pfaff, Johanna Ospel, Mayank Goyal, Aman B Patel, Vitor Mendes Pereira, Uta Hanning, Lukas Meyer, Wim H van Zwam, Martin Bendszus, Martin Wiesmann, Markus Möhlenbruch, Charlotte Sabine Weyland
{"title":"Treatment practice of vasospasm during endovascular thrombectomy: an international survey.","authors":"Jessica Jesser, Thanh Nguyen, Adam A Dmytriw, Hiroshi Yamagami, Zhongrong Miao, Louisa Johanna Sommer, Andrea Stockero, Johannes Alex Rolf Pfaff, Johanna Ospel, Mayank Goyal, Aman B Patel, Vitor Mendes Pereira, Uta Hanning, Lukas Meyer, Wim H van Zwam, Martin Bendszus, Martin Wiesmann, Markus Möhlenbruch, Charlotte Sabine Weyland","doi":"10.1136/svn-2023-002788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>The clinical importance and management of vasospasm as a complication during endovascular stroke treatment (EVT) has not been well studied. We sought to investigate current expert opinions in neurointervention and therapeutic strategies of iatrogenic vasospasm during EVT.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted an anonymous international online survey (4 April 2023 to 15 May 2023) addressing treatment standards of neurointerventionalists (NIs) practising EVT. Several illustrative cases of patients with vasospasm during EVT were shown. Two study groups were compared according to the NI's opinion regarding the potential influence of vasospasm on patient outcome after EVT using descriptive analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 534 NI from 56 countries responded, of whom 51.5% had performed >200 EVT. Vasospasm was considered a complication potentially influencing the patient's outcome by 52.6% (group 1) whereas 47.4% did not (group 2). Physicians in group 1 more often added vasodilators to their catheter flushes during EVT routinely (43.7% vs 33.9%, p=0.033) and more often treated severe large-vessel vasospasm with vasodilators (75.3% vs 55.9%; p<0.001), as well as extracranial vasospasm (61.4% vs 36.5%, p<0.001) and intracranial medium-vessel vasospasm (27.1% vs 11.2%, p<0.001), compared with group 2. In case of a large-vessel vasospasm and residual and amenable medium-vessel occlusion during EVT, the study groups showed different treatment strategies. Group 2 continued the EVT immediately more often, without initiating therapy to treat the vasospasm first (9.6% vs 21.1%, p<0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There is disagreement among NIs about the clinical relevance of vasospasm during EVT and its management. There was a higher likelihood of use of preventive and active vasodilator treatment in the group that perceived vasospasm as a relevant complication as well as differing interventional strategies for continuing an EVT in the presence of a large-vessel vasospasm.</p>","PeriodicalId":48733,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Investigative Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"490-496"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11732841/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Investigative Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/svn-2023-002788","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: The clinical importance and management of vasospasm as a complication during endovascular stroke treatment (EVT) has not been well studied. We sought to investigate current expert opinions in neurointervention and therapeutic strategies of iatrogenic vasospasm during EVT.

Methods: We conducted an anonymous international online survey (4 April 2023 to 15 May 2023) addressing treatment standards of neurointerventionalists (NIs) practising EVT. Several illustrative cases of patients with vasospasm during EVT were shown. Two study groups were compared according to the NI's opinion regarding the potential influence of vasospasm on patient outcome after EVT using descriptive analysis.

Results: In total, 534 NI from 56 countries responded, of whom 51.5% had performed >200 EVT. Vasospasm was considered a complication potentially influencing the patient's outcome by 52.6% (group 1) whereas 47.4% did not (group 2). Physicians in group 1 more often added vasodilators to their catheter flushes during EVT routinely (43.7% vs 33.9%, p=0.033) and more often treated severe large-vessel vasospasm with vasodilators (75.3% vs 55.9%; p<0.001), as well as extracranial vasospasm (61.4% vs 36.5%, p<0.001) and intracranial medium-vessel vasospasm (27.1% vs 11.2%, p<0.001), compared with group 2. In case of a large-vessel vasospasm and residual and amenable medium-vessel occlusion during EVT, the study groups showed different treatment strategies. Group 2 continued the EVT immediately more often, without initiating therapy to treat the vasospasm first (9.6% vs 21.1%, p<0.001).

Conclusion: There is disagreement among NIs about the clinical relevance of vasospasm during EVT and its management. There was a higher likelihood of use of preventive and active vasodilator treatment in the group that perceived vasospasm as a relevant complication as well as differing interventional strategies for continuing an EVT in the presence of a large-vessel vasospasm.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血管内血栓切除术中血管痉挛的治疗方法:一项国际调查。
背景和目的:血管痉挛作为血管内卒中治疗(EVT)过程中的并发症,其临床重要性和处理方法尚未得到充分研究。我们试图调查目前专家对 EVT 期间先天性血管痉挛的神经干预和治疗策略的看法:我们开展了一项匿名国际在线调查(2023 年 4 月 4 日至 2023 年 5 月 15 日),调查对象为从事 EVT 的神经介入专家(NIs)的治疗标准。调查中展示了几例在 EVT 过程中出现血管痉挛的患者。通过描述性分析,根据神经介入医师对血管痉挛对 EVT 后患者预后的潜在影响的看法,对两个研究组进行了比较:共有来自 56 个国家的 534 名 NI 作出了回应,其中 51.5% 的 NI 曾实施过超过 200 例 EVT。52.6%的人认为血管痉挛是可能影响患者预后的并发症(第1组),而47.4%的人不这么认为(第2组)。第 1 组的医生更常在常规 EVT 期间的导管冲洗中加入血管扩张剂(43.7% 对 33.9%,P=0.033),也更常使用血管扩张剂治疗严重的大血管痉挛(75.3% 对 55.9%;P=0.033):国家医疗机构对 EVT 期间血管痉挛的临床意义及其处理存在分歧。认为血管痉挛是相关并发症的组别更有可能使用预防性和积极的血管扩张剂治疗,而在出现大血管痉挛时继续进行 EVT 的介入策略也不尽相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Investigative Medicine
Journal of Investigative Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNALMEDICINE, RESE-MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
自引率
0.00%
发文量
111
期刊介绍: Journal of Investigative Medicine (JIM) is the official publication of the American Federation for Medical Research. The journal is peer-reviewed and publishes high-quality original articles and reviews in the areas of basic, clinical, and translational medical research. JIM publishes on all topics and specialty areas that are critical to the conduct of the entire spectrum of biomedical research: from the translation of clinical observations at the bedside, to basic and animal research to clinical research and the implementation of innovative medical care.
期刊最新文献
Efficacy of butylphthalide in preventing cognitive decline in ischaemic stroke survivors: a 12-month prospective following-up study. Chinese stroke association guidelines on reperfusion therapy for acute ischaemic stroke 2024. Dual antiplatelet therapy with ticagrelor vs clopidogrel in patients with TIA or minor stroke with or without symptomatic carotid artery stenosis: a post hoc analysis of the CHANCE-2 trial. Comments on the article 'Sex differences in the epidemiology of spontaneous and traumatic cervical artery dissections'. Should patients with minor strokes be given thrombolytics?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1