The value of saccade metrics and VOR gain in detecting a vestibular stroke.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q2 NEUROSCIENCES Journal of Vestibular Research-Equilibrium & Orientation Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3233/VES-230083
Efterpi Michailidou, Athanasia Korda, Thomas Wyss, Stanislav Bardins, Erich Schneider, Miranda Morrison, Franca Wagner, Marco D Caversaccio, Georgios Mantokoudis
{"title":"The value of saccade metrics and VOR gain in detecting a vestibular stroke.","authors":"Efterpi Michailidou, Athanasia Korda, Thomas Wyss, Stanislav Bardins, Erich Schneider, Miranda Morrison, Franca Wagner, Marco D Caversaccio, Georgios Mantokoudis","doi":"10.3233/VES-230083","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>A normal video Head Impulse Test is the gold standard in the emergency department to rule-in patients with an acute vestibular syndrome and a stroke. We aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of vHIT metrics regarding the vestibulo-ocular reflex gain and the corrective saccades in detecting vestibular strokes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Prospective cross-sectional study (convenience sample) of patients presenting with acute vestibular syndrome in the emergency department of a tertiary referral centre between February 2015 and May 2020. We screened 1677 patients and enrolled 76 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria of acute vestibular syndrome. All patients underwent video head impulse test with automated and manual data analysis. A delayed MRI served as a gold standard for vestibular stroke confirmation.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 76 patients, 52 were diagnosed with acute unilateral vestibulopathy and 24 with vestibular strokes. The overall accuracy of detecting stroke with an automated vestibulo-ocular reflex gain was 86.8%, compared to 77.6% for cumulative saccade amplitude and automatic saccade mean peak velocity measured by an expert and 71% for cumulative saccade amplitude and saccade mean peak velocity measured automatically. Gain misclassified 13.1% of the patients as false positive or false negative, manual cumulative saccade amplitude and saccade mean peak velocity 22.3%, and automated cumulative saccade amplitude and saccade mean peak velocity 28.9% respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We found a better accuracy of video head impulse test for the diagnosis of vestibular strokes when using the vestibulo-ocular reflex gain than using saccade metrics. Nevertheless, saccades provide an additional and important information for video head impulse test evaluation. The automated saccade detection algorithm is not yet perfect compared to expert analysis, but it may become a valuable tool for future non-expert video head impulse test evaluations.</p>","PeriodicalId":49960,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Vestibular Research-Equilibrium & Orientation","volume":" ","pages":"49-61"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Vestibular Research-Equilibrium & Orientation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3233/VES-230083","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: A normal video Head Impulse Test is the gold standard in the emergency department to rule-in patients with an acute vestibular syndrome and a stroke. We aimed to compare the diagnostic accuracy of vHIT metrics regarding the vestibulo-ocular reflex gain and the corrective saccades in detecting vestibular strokes.

Methods: Prospective cross-sectional study (convenience sample) of patients presenting with acute vestibular syndrome in the emergency department of a tertiary referral centre between February 2015 and May 2020. We screened 1677 patients and enrolled 76 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria of acute vestibular syndrome. All patients underwent video head impulse test with automated and manual data analysis. A delayed MRI served as a gold standard for vestibular stroke confirmation.

Results: Out of 76 patients, 52 were diagnosed with acute unilateral vestibulopathy and 24 with vestibular strokes. The overall accuracy of detecting stroke with an automated vestibulo-ocular reflex gain was 86.8%, compared to 77.6% for cumulative saccade amplitude and automatic saccade mean peak velocity measured by an expert and 71% for cumulative saccade amplitude and saccade mean peak velocity measured automatically. Gain misclassified 13.1% of the patients as false positive or false negative, manual cumulative saccade amplitude and saccade mean peak velocity 22.3%, and automated cumulative saccade amplitude and saccade mean peak velocity 28.9% respectively.

Conclusions: We found a better accuracy of video head impulse test for the diagnosis of vestibular strokes when using the vestibulo-ocular reflex gain than using saccade metrics. Nevertheless, saccades provide an additional and important information for video head impulse test evaluation. The automated saccade detection algorithm is not yet perfect compared to expert analysis, but it may become a valuable tool for future non-expert video head impulse test evaluations.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
检测前庭中风的囊状移动指标和 VOR 增益的价值。
目的:正常的视频头脉冲测试是急诊科排除急性前庭综合征和中风患者的金标准。我们的目的是比较 vHIT 在前庭眼反射增益和矫正性眼球运动方面的指标对检测前庭中风的诊断准确性:对2015年2月至2020年5月期间在一家三级转诊中心急诊科就诊的急性前庭综合征患者进行前瞻性横断面研究(方便样本)。我们筛查了 1677 名患者,其中 76 名患者符合急性前庭综合征的纳入标准。所有患者都接受了视频头部脉冲测试,并进行了自动和手动数据分析。延迟核磁共振成像是确认前庭中风的金标准:在 76 名患者中,52 人被诊断为急性单侧前庭综合征,24 人被诊断为前庭中风。使用自动前庭眼反射增益检测中风的总体准确率为 86.8%,而专家测量的累积囊回扫幅度和自动囊回扫平均峰值速度的准确率为 77.6%,自动测量的累积囊回扫幅度和囊回扫平均峰值速度的准确率为 71%。Gain将13.1%的患者误诊为假阳性或假阴性,手动累积囊回幅度和囊回平均峰值速度误诊率为22.3%,自动累积囊回幅度和囊回平均峰值速度误诊率为28.9%:我们发现,在诊断前庭性脑卒中时,使用前庭眼反射增益进行视频头脉冲测试比使用囊回测量的准确性更高。然而,囊回为视频头脉冲测试评估提供了额外的重要信息。与专家分析相比,自动囊回检测算法还不够完善,但它可能成为未来非专家视频头脉冲测试评估的重要工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
4.30%
发文量
66
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Vestibular Research is a peer-reviewed journal that publishes experimental and observational studies, review papers, and theoretical papers based on current knowledge of the vestibular system. Subjects of the studies can include experimental animals, normal humans, and humans with vestibular or other related disorders. Study topics can include the following: Anatomy of the vestibular system, including vestibulo-ocular, vestibulo-spinal, and vestibulo-autonomic pathways Balance disorders Neurochemistry and neuropharmacology of balance, both at the systems and single neuron level Neurophysiology of balance, including the vestibular, ocular motor, autonomic, and postural control systems Psychophysics of spatial orientation Space and motion sickness Vestibular rehabilitation Vestibular-related human performance in various environments
期刊最新文献
Vestibular migraine as a mimic of benign paroxysmal positioning vertigo and Meniere's disease. Effects of monaural sound stimulation on subjective visual vertical. Simulator sickness among helicopter pilots: Incidence, threshold and severity using the SSQ. The vestibular symptomatology of Machado-Joseph Disease. Is vestibular function related to human hippocampal volume?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1