DNA damage response-related immune activation signature predicts the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors: from gastrointestinal cancer analysis to pan-cancer validation.

IF 5.6 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Cancer Biology & Medicine Pub Date : 2023-12-29 DOI:10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2023.0303
Junya Yan, Shibo Wang, Jing Zhang, Qiangqiang Yuan, Xianchun Gao, Nannan Zhang, Yan Pan, Haohao Zhang, Kun Liu, Jun Yu, Linbin Lu, Hui Liu, Xiaoliang Gao, Sheng Zhao, Wenyao Zhang, Abudurousuli Reyila, Yu Qi, Qiujin Zhang, Shundong Cang, Yuanyuan Lu, Yanglin Pan, Yan Kong, Yongzhan Nie
{"title":"DNA damage response-related immune activation signature predicts the response to immune checkpoint inhibitors: from gastrointestinal cancer analysis to pan-cancer validation.","authors":"Junya Yan, Shibo Wang, Jing Zhang, Qiangqiang Yuan, Xianchun Gao, Nannan Zhang, Yan Pan, Haohao Zhang, Kun Liu, Jun Yu, Linbin Lu, Hui Liu, Xiaoliang Gao, Sheng Zhao, Wenyao Zhang, Abudurousuli Reyila, Yu Qi, Qiujin Zhang, Shundong Cang, Yuanyuan Lu, Yanglin Pan, Yan Kong, Yongzhan Nie","doi":"10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2023.0303","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>DNA damage response (DDR) deficiency has emerged as a prominent determinant of tumor immunogenicity. This study aimed to construct a DDR-related immune activation (DRIA) signature and evaluate the predictive accuracy of the DRIA signature for response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in gastrointestinal (GI) cancer.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A DRIA signature was established based on two previously reported DNA damage immune response assays. Clinical and gene expression data from two published GI cancer cohorts were used to assess and validate the association between the DRIA score and response to ICI therapy. The predictive accuracy of the DRIA score was validated based on one ICI-treated melanoma and three pan-cancer published cohorts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The DRIA signature includes three genes (<i>CXCL10</i>, <i>IDO1</i>, and <i>IFI44L</i>). In the discovery cancer cohort, DRIA-high patients with gastric cancer achieved a higher response rate to ICI therapy than DRIA-low patients (81.8% <i>vs.</i> 8.8%; <i>P</i> < 0.001), and the predictive accuracy of the DRIA score [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) = 0.845] was superior to the predictive accuracy of PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden, microsatellite instability, and Epstein-Barr virus status. The validation cohort demonstrated that the DRIA score identified responders with microsatellite-stable colorectal and pancreatic adenocarcinoma who received dual PD-1 and CTLA-4 blockade with radiation therapy. Furthermore, the predictive performance of the DRIA score was shown to be robust through an extended validation in melanoma, urothelial cancer, and pan-cancer.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The DRIA signature has superior and robust predictive accuracy for the efficacy of ICI therapy in GI cancer and pan-cancer, indicating that the DRIA signature may serve as a powerful biomarker for guiding ICI therapy decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9611,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Biology & Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10976329/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Biology & Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20892/j.issn.2095-3941.2023.0303","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: DNA damage response (DDR) deficiency has emerged as a prominent determinant of tumor immunogenicity. This study aimed to construct a DDR-related immune activation (DRIA) signature and evaluate the predictive accuracy of the DRIA signature for response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in gastrointestinal (GI) cancer.

Methods: A DRIA signature was established based on two previously reported DNA damage immune response assays. Clinical and gene expression data from two published GI cancer cohorts were used to assess and validate the association between the DRIA score and response to ICI therapy. The predictive accuracy of the DRIA score was validated based on one ICI-treated melanoma and three pan-cancer published cohorts.

Results: The DRIA signature includes three genes (CXCL10, IDO1, and IFI44L). In the discovery cancer cohort, DRIA-high patients with gastric cancer achieved a higher response rate to ICI therapy than DRIA-low patients (81.8% vs. 8.8%; P < 0.001), and the predictive accuracy of the DRIA score [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) = 0.845] was superior to the predictive accuracy of PD-L1 expression, tumor mutational burden, microsatellite instability, and Epstein-Barr virus status. The validation cohort demonstrated that the DRIA score identified responders with microsatellite-stable colorectal and pancreatic adenocarcinoma who received dual PD-1 and CTLA-4 blockade with radiation therapy. Furthermore, the predictive performance of the DRIA score was shown to be robust through an extended validation in melanoma, urothelial cancer, and pan-cancer.

Conclusions: The DRIA signature has superior and robust predictive accuracy for the efficacy of ICI therapy in GI cancer and pan-cancer, indicating that the DRIA signature may serve as a powerful biomarker for guiding ICI therapy decisions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
DNA 损伤反应相关免疫激活特征预测对免疫检查点抑制剂的反应:从胃肠癌分析到泛癌症验证。
目的:DNA损伤应答(DDR)缺陷已成为肿瘤免疫原性的一个重要决定因素。本研究旨在构建DDR相关免疫激活(DRIA)特征,并评估DRIA特征对胃肠道(GI)癌免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)治疗反应的预测准确性:方法:根据之前报道的两种DNA损伤免疫反应检测方法建立了DRIA特征。方法:根据之前报道的两种DNA损伤免疫反应测定方法建立了DRIA特征,并使用两个已发表的胃肠癌队列中的临床和基因表达数据来评估和验证DRIA评分与ICI治疗反应之间的关联。根据一个接受过 ICI 治疗的黑色素瘤和三个已发表的泛癌症队列验证了 DRIA 评分的预测准确性:结果:DRIA特征包括三个基因(CXCL10、IDO1和IFI44L)。在发现癌队列中,DRIA高的胃癌患者对ICI治疗的反应率高于DRIA低的患者(81.8% vs. 8.8%;P < 0.001),DRIA评分的预测准确性[接收器操作特征曲线下面积(AUC)= 0.845]优于PD-L1表达、肿瘤突变负荷、微卫星不稳定性和Epstein-Barr病毒状态的预测准确性。验证队列表明,DRIA评分能识别微卫星不稳定的结直肠癌和胰腺癌患者,这些患者在接受放疗的同时接受了PD-1和CTLA-4双重阻断。此外,通过在黑色素瘤、尿路上皮癌和泛癌中的扩展验证,DRIA评分的预测性能被证明是稳健的:结论:DRIA特征对消化道癌症和泛癌症的ICI疗效具有卓越而稳健的预测准确性,这表明DRIA特征可作为一种强大的生物标记物来指导ICI治疗决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Cancer Biology & Medicine
Cancer Biology & Medicine Medicine-Oncology
CiteScore
9.80
自引率
3.60%
发文量
1143
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Cancer Biology & Medicine (ISSN 2095-3941) is a peer-reviewed open-access journal of Chinese Anti-cancer Association (CACA), which is the leading professional society of oncology in China. The journal quarterly provides innovative and significant information on biological basis of cancer, cancer microenvironment, translational cancer research, and all aspects of clinical cancer research. The journal also publishes significant perspectives on indigenous cancer types in China.
期刊最新文献
Potential treatment approaches for malignant peritoneal mesothelioma: in vivo and in vitro experimental study of natural killer cell immunotherapy. Inflammatory signaling in targeted therapy resistance: focus on EGFR-targeted treatment. Intricate roles of estrogen and estrogen receptors in digestive system cancers: a systematic review. Personalized laparoscopic radical resection of gallbladder cancer by staining of the liver draining area through ICG injection into the cholecystic artery. Ubiquitination in osteosarcoma: unveiling the impact on cell biology and therapeutic strategies.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1