Recovery of Phenolic Compounds from Orange Peel Waste by Conventional and Assisted Extraction Techniques Using Sustainable Solvents.

Blanca Sáenz de Miera, Raquel Cañadas, María González-Miquel, Emilio J González
{"title":"Recovery of Phenolic Compounds from Orange Peel Waste by Conventional and Assisted Extraction Techniques Using Sustainable Solvents.","authors":"Blanca Sáenz de Miera, Raquel Cañadas, María González-Miquel, Emilio J González","doi":"10.31083/j.fbe1504030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The valorization of orange peel waste (OPW) through the extraction of bioactive compounds is a clear example of the circular economy. OPW contains many value-added compounds, among which bioactive phenolic compounds (flavonoids and phenolic acids) could be extracted and used for industrial applications, such as pharmaceuticals or cosmetics.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this work, the extraction of phenolic compounds from orange peel was carried out by conventional (orbital shaker) and assisted (ultrasound and microwave) extraction techniques using deionized water, 80% (v/v) ethanol in water, and ethyl acetate as solvents. The effect of temperature, extraction time, and type of technique was evaluated and discussed following spectrophotometric (total phenolic content and total flavonoid content) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analyses of the extracts.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The most effective extraction in terms of efficiency was achieved by microwave-assisted extraction using 80% (v/v) ethanol in water as the extraction solvent, at 373 K for 6 min, which obtained 7.2 ± 0.1 mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/g OPW and 13.3 ± 0.1 mg quercetin equivalent (QE)/g OPW, with the main bioactive compound extracted being hesperidin (58.2 ± 0.2 mg/g OPW). The most effective extraction in terms of energy consumption was achieved using ultrasound-probe-assisted extraction, yielding 8.8 ± 0.0 mg GAE/g OPW; 17.1 ± 0.1 mg QE/g OPW; 40.0 ± 0.2 mg hesperidin/g OPW, with an energy consumption of 18 kJ.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Ultrasound and microwave-assisted extractions can be considered efficient extraction technologies for the valorization of OPW as they reduce extraction time and energy consumption and increase extraction yield.</p>","PeriodicalId":73068,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in bioscience (Elite edition)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in bioscience (Elite edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.fbe1504030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The valorization of orange peel waste (OPW) through the extraction of bioactive compounds is a clear example of the circular economy. OPW contains many value-added compounds, among which bioactive phenolic compounds (flavonoids and phenolic acids) could be extracted and used for industrial applications, such as pharmaceuticals or cosmetics.

Methods: In this work, the extraction of phenolic compounds from orange peel was carried out by conventional (orbital shaker) and assisted (ultrasound and microwave) extraction techniques using deionized water, 80% (v/v) ethanol in water, and ethyl acetate as solvents. The effect of temperature, extraction time, and type of technique was evaluated and discussed following spectrophotometric (total phenolic content and total flavonoid content) and high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) analyses of the extracts.

Results: The most effective extraction in terms of efficiency was achieved by microwave-assisted extraction using 80% (v/v) ethanol in water as the extraction solvent, at 373 K for 6 min, which obtained 7.2 ± 0.1 mg gallic acid equivalent (GAE)/g OPW and 13.3 ± 0.1 mg quercetin equivalent (QE)/g OPW, with the main bioactive compound extracted being hesperidin (58.2 ± 0.2 mg/g OPW). The most effective extraction in terms of energy consumption was achieved using ultrasound-probe-assisted extraction, yielding 8.8 ± 0.0 mg GAE/g OPW; 17.1 ± 0.1 mg QE/g OPW; 40.0 ± 0.2 mg hesperidin/g OPW, with an energy consumption of 18 kJ.

Conclusions: Ultrasound and microwave-assisted extractions can be considered efficient extraction technologies for the valorization of OPW as they reduce extraction time and energy consumption and increase extraction yield.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用可持续溶剂的传统和辅助萃取技术从橘皮废料中回收酚类化合物
背景:通过提取生物活性化合物实现橘皮废料(OPW)的价值化是循环经济的一个明显例子。橘皮废料中含有许多高附加值的化合物,其中生物活性酚类化合物(类黄酮和酚酸)可被提取出来并用于制药或化妆品等工业用途:本研究以去离子水、80%(v/v)乙醇水溶液和乙酸乙酯为溶剂,采用常规(轨道摇床)和辅助(超声波和微波)萃取技术提取橘皮中的酚类化合物。在对提取物进行分光光度法(总酚含量和总黄酮含量)和高效液相色谱法(HPLC)分析后,对温度、提取时间和技术类型的影响进行了评估和讨论:微波辅助萃取的效率最高,萃取溶剂为 80%(v/v)乙醇水溶液,在 373 K 下萃取 6 分钟,可获得 7.2 ± 0.1 毫克没食子酸当量(GAE)/克 OPW 和 13.3 ± 0.1 毫克槲皮素当量(QE)/克 OPW,提取的主要生物活性化合物为橙皮甙(58.2 ± 0.2 毫克/克 OPW)。就能耗而言,超声波探针辅助萃取的效果最好,可获得 8.8 ± 0.0 毫克 GAE/g OPW;17.1 ± 0.1 毫克 QE/g OPW;40.0 ± 0.2 毫克橙皮甙/g OPW,能耗为 18 kJ:结论:超声波和微波辅助萃取可减少萃取时间和能耗,提高萃取率,因此可被视为实现 OPW 价值化的高效萃取技术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Quercetin, the Potential Powerful Flavonoid for Human and Food: A Review. Streptomyces as a Novel Biotool for Azo Pigments Remediation in Contaminated Scenarios. Biotechnological Advances Utilizing Aptamers and Peptides Refining PD-L1 Targeting. Obtaining Melanin-Synthesizing Strains of Bacillus thuringiensis and their Use for Biological Preparations. Implementation of a Macroporous Polyhydroxyethylmethacrylate Cryogel-Based Mini-Bioreactor System to Improve Monoclonal Antibody Production.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1