Implementation of an Un-Pairing Passport to Improve the Transition From Intern to Resident During a Critical Period of Anesthesiology Residency Training.

Ashley N Soppe, Joshua M Hauser, Andrew R Jacobson, Angela D McElrath
{"title":"Implementation of an Un-Pairing Passport to Improve the Transition From Intern to Resident During a Critical Period of Anesthesiology Residency Training.","authors":"Ashley N Soppe, Joshua M Hauser, Andrew R Jacobson, Angela D McElrath","doi":"10.46374/volxxv_issue4_Soppe","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The transition from intern year to the first year of clinical anesthesiology residency (CA-1) is a challenging period for residents and their supervisors. Orientation methods and instructional material targeting this transition vary across U.S. residency programs. An un-pairing passport was implemented during the 2021-2022 transition to guide and provide expectations for interns, senior residents, and staff. The objective of this quality improvement project was to assess the effectiveness of the passport in improving the transition period and overall preparedness of the new CA-1s.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We surveyed 3 groups (CA-1s, CA-2s/CA-3s, and staff anesthesiologists) 6 months after the completion of passport implementation to retrospectively assess the 2021-2022 CA-1 class's preparedness across 7 domains compared with those who transitioned before passport implementation. Mann-Whitney <i>U</i> statistics and median effect sizes were used to compare pre- and postintervention.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Self-reflected preparedness scores of the CA-1s were higher across all domains compared with the senior resident group (r = 0.328-0.548). Overall level of comfort and preparedness for the start of the CA-1 year was higher in the postintervention group (r = 0.162- 0.514). Staff anesthesiologists' perceived preparedness of the residents was also higher across all domains for the postintervention group (r = 0.197-0.387).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The un-pairing passport improved residents' and staff anesthesiologists' subjective assessments of the readiness of new CA-1 residents after a critical transition in their training. Similar tools can be more broadly applied to other anesthesiology residency and possibly fellowship programs as well as subspecialty rotations within those programs.</p>","PeriodicalId":75067,"journal":{"name":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","volume":"25 4","pages":"E719"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10753154/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46374/volxxv_issue4_Soppe","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The transition from intern year to the first year of clinical anesthesiology residency (CA-1) is a challenging period for residents and their supervisors. Orientation methods and instructional material targeting this transition vary across U.S. residency programs. An un-pairing passport was implemented during the 2021-2022 transition to guide and provide expectations for interns, senior residents, and staff. The objective of this quality improvement project was to assess the effectiveness of the passport in improving the transition period and overall preparedness of the new CA-1s.

Methods: We surveyed 3 groups (CA-1s, CA-2s/CA-3s, and staff anesthesiologists) 6 months after the completion of passport implementation to retrospectively assess the 2021-2022 CA-1 class's preparedness across 7 domains compared with those who transitioned before passport implementation. Mann-Whitney U statistics and median effect sizes were used to compare pre- and postintervention.

Results: Self-reflected preparedness scores of the CA-1s were higher across all domains compared with the senior resident group (r = 0.328-0.548). Overall level of comfort and preparedness for the start of the CA-1 year was higher in the postintervention group (r = 0.162- 0.514). Staff anesthesiologists' perceived preparedness of the residents was also higher across all domains for the postintervention group (r = 0.197-0.387).

Conclusion: The un-pairing passport improved residents' and staff anesthesiologists' subjective assessments of the readiness of new CA-1 residents after a critical transition in their training. Similar tools can be more broadly applied to other anesthesiology residency and possibly fellowship programs as well as subspecialty rotations within those programs.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在麻醉科住院医师培训的关键时期,实施 "无配对护照 "以改善从实习生到住院医师的过渡。
背景:从实习年过渡到临床麻醉学住院医师培训(CA-1)的第一年,对于住院医师及其导师来说是一个具有挑战性的时期。美国各住院医师培训项目针对这一过渡阶段的指导方法和教材各不相同。在 2021-2022 年的过渡期间,实施了未配对护照,为实习生、高年级住院医师和工作人员提供指导和期望。本质量改进项目的目的是评估护照在改善过渡期和新 CA-1 的整体准备情况方面的有效性:我们在护照实施 6 个月后对 3 组人员(CA-1、CA-2/CA-3 和麻醉科医生)进行了调查,以回顾性评估 2021-2022 年 CA-1 级人员在 7 个领域的准备情况,并与护照实施前的过渡人员进行比较。采用曼-惠特尼 U 统计法和中位数效应大小对干预前后进行比较:结果:与高年资住院医师组相比,CA-1 学生在所有领域的自我反思准备得分都更高(r = 0.328-0.548)。干预后组对 CA-1 年级开始的整体舒适度和准备程度更高(r = 0.162-0.514)。干预后组别中,麻醉科医生认为住院医生在所有领域的准备程度也更高(r = 0.197-0.387):解除配对通行证改善了住院医师和麻醉科医生对 CA-1 级新住院医师在培训关键过渡后的准备情况的主观评估。类似的工具可以更广泛地应用于其他麻醉学住院医师培训项目、可能的研究员培训项目以及这些项目中的亚专科轮转。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Geographical Distribution of Newly Accredited Anesthesiology Training Programs in Relation to Health Professional Shortage Areas and Medically Underserved Populations. Identification of Candidate Characteristics that Predicted a Successful Anesthesiology Residency Program Match in 2024: An Anonymous, Prospective Survey. The Role of Ombuds in Graduate Medical Education: Fostering Wellness and Psychological Safety. Assessment and Recommendations for the Society of Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology Fellowship Websites. Development of a Prioritized Anesthesiology Residency Critical Care Content Outline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1