The Effectiveness of Direct Supervision by an Attending Compared To a Senior Resident on Quality of Supervision of Novice Anesthesiology Residents: A Randomized Study.

Christopher Malgieri, Mark C Kendall, Arezoo Rajaee, Ian Hoffman, Patricia Apruzzese, Gildasio De Oliveira
{"title":"The Effectiveness of Direct Supervision by an Attending Compared To a Senior Resident on Quality of Supervision of Novice Anesthesiology Residents: A Randomized Study.","authors":"Christopher Malgieri, Mark C Kendall, Arezoo Rajaee, Ian Hoffman, Patricia Apruzzese, Gildasio De Oliveira","doi":"10.46374/volxxv_issue4_Kendall","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>New trainees are directly supervised by either an attending physician or a senior resident under indirect supervision from an attending physician. The main objective was to evaluate which type of direct supervision (attending vs. senior resident) would result in better quality of supervision to novice residents during their first month of training.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Novice anesthesiology residents were randomized to receive direct supervision by an attending anesthesiologist or a senior resident during their introduction month of intraoperative anesthesia. The primary outcome was a validated instrument to evaluate supervision performance of the instructor. The secondary outcome was a validated anxiety scale.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The overall mean supervision score across the study days was greater in the residents who were directly supervised by attendings, mean (standard error [SE]) of 3.88 ± 0.03 compared with direct supervision by a senior resident, mean (SE) of 3.77 ± 0.03 a mean difference of 0.11 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05-0.16), <i>P</i> = .0012. Five of 9 individual items on the supervision survey were significantly greater in the group directly supervised by attendings compared with residents. There was no difference between groups regarding anxiety scores. In contrast, there was a mild association between supervision scores and Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-6 anxiety scores, correlation coefficient = 0.23 (95% CI, 0.08-0.39), <i>P</i> < .0035.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>We detected better supervision scores when novice anesthesiology residents were directly supervised by attendings when compared with senior residents. Nevertheless, direct supervision by senior residents still provided supervision scores consistent with a safe supervision practice.</p>","PeriodicalId":75067,"journal":{"name":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","volume":"25 4","pages":"E718"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-12-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10753162/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of education in perioperative medicine : JEPM","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46374/volxxv_issue4_Kendall","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: New trainees are directly supervised by either an attending physician or a senior resident under indirect supervision from an attending physician. The main objective was to evaluate which type of direct supervision (attending vs. senior resident) would result in better quality of supervision to novice residents during their first month of training.

Methods: Novice anesthesiology residents were randomized to receive direct supervision by an attending anesthesiologist or a senior resident during their introduction month of intraoperative anesthesia. The primary outcome was a validated instrument to evaluate supervision performance of the instructor. The secondary outcome was a validated anxiety scale.

Results: The overall mean supervision score across the study days was greater in the residents who were directly supervised by attendings, mean (standard error [SE]) of 3.88 ± 0.03 compared with direct supervision by a senior resident, mean (SE) of 3.77 ± 0.03 a mean difference of 0.11 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.05-0.16), P = .0012. Five of 9 individual items on the supervision survey were significantly greater in the group directly supervised by attendings compared with residents. There was no difference between groups regarding anxiety scores. In contrast, there was a mild association between supervision scores and Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-6 anxiety scores, correlation coefficient = 0.23 (95% CI, 0.08-0.39), P < .0035.

Conclusions: We detected better supervision scores when novice anesthesiology residents were directly supervised by attendings when compared with senior residents. Nevertheless, direct supervision by senior residents still provided supervision scores consistent with a safe supervision practice.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主治医师与资深住院医师的直接指导对麻醉学新手住院医师指导质量的影响:随机研究。
背景:新学员由主治医师直接指导,或由高年资住院医师在主治医师的间接指导下进行指导。主要目的是评估哪种类型的直接指导(主治医师与资深住院医师)会使新手住院医师在接受培训的第一个月获得更高质量的指导:方法:麻醉科新手住院医师被随机分配到接受麻醉科主治医师或资深住院医师的直接指导。主要结果是用一个经过验证的工具来评估指导者的指导表现。次要结果是有效的焦虑量表:由主治医师直接指导的住院医师在整个研究日的总体平均指导得分更高,平均值(标准误差 [SE])为 3.88 ± 0.03,而由资深住院医师直接指导的住院医师的平均值(SE)为 3.77 ± 0.03,平均差异为 0.11(95% 置信区间 [CI],0.05-0.16),P = .0012。在督导调查的 9 个单项中,主治医师直接督导组与住院医师直接督导组相比,有 5 个单项的得分明显更高。在焦虑评分方面,组间没有差异。相反,督导得分与 Spielberger 状态-特质焦虑量表-6 焦虑得分之间存在轻微关联,相关系数 = 0.23 (95% CI, 0.08-0.39), P < .0035:与高年资住院医师相比,我们发现由主治医师直接指导麻醉科新手住院医师的指导得分更高。尽管如此,由资深住院医师直接指导的指导得分仍符合安全指导实践的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Geographical Distribution of Newly Accredited Anesthesiology Training Programs in Relation to Health Professional Shortage Areas and Medically Underserved Populations. Identification of Candidate Characteristics that Predicted a Successful Anesthesiology Residency Program Match in 2024: An Anonymous, Prospective Survey. The Role of Ombuds in Graduate Medical Education: Fostering Wellness and Psychological Safety. Assessment and Recommendations for the Society of Obstetric Anesthesia and Perinatology Fellowship Websites. Development of a Prioritized Anesthesiology Residency Critical Care Content Outline.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1