Exact testing for heteroscedasticity in a two-way layout in variety frost trials when incorporating a covariate

Pub Date : 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1111/anzs.12404
Angelika A. Pilkington, Brenton R. Clarke, Dean A. Diepeveen
{"title":"Exact testing for heteroscedasticity in a two-way layout in variety frost trials when incorporating a covariate","authors":"Angelika A. Pilkington, Brenton R. Clarke, Dean A. Diepeveen","doi":"10.1111/anzs.12404","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two-way layouts are common in grain industry research where it is often the case that there are one or more covariates. It is widely recognised that when estimating fixed effect parameters, one should also examine for possible extra error variance structure. An exact test for heteroscedasticity, when there is a covariate, is illustrated for a data set from frost trials in Western Australia. While the general algebra for the test is known, albeit in past literature, there are computational aspects of implementing the test for the two way when there are covariates. In this scenario the test is shown to have greater power than the industry standard, and because of its exact size, is preferable to use of the restricted maximum likelihood ratio test (REMLRT) based on the approximate asymptotic distribution in this instance. Formulation of the exact test considered here involves creation of appropriate contrasts in the experimental design. This is illustrated using specific choices of observations corresponding to an index set in the linear model for the two-way layout. Also an algorithm supplied complements the test. Comparisons of size and power then ensue. The test has natural extensions when there are unbalanced data, and more than one covariate may be present. Results can be extended to Balanced Incomplete Block Designs.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/anzs.12404","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Two-way layouts are common in grain industry research where it is often the case that there are one or more covariates. It is widely recognised that when estimating fixed effect parameters, one should also examine for possible extra error variance structure. An exact test for heteroscedasticity, when there is a covariate, is illustrated for a data set from frost trials in Western Australia. While the general algebra for the test is known, albeit in past literature, there are computational aspects of implementing the test for the two way when there are covariates. In this scenario the test is shown to have greater power than the industry standard, and because of its exact size, is preferable to use of the restricted maximum likelihood ratio test (REMLRT) based on the approximate asymptotic distribution in this instance. Formulation of the exact test considered here involves creation of appropriate contrasts in the experimental design. This is illustrated using specific choices of observations corresponding to an index set in the linear model for the two-way layout. Also an algorithm supplied complements the test. Comparisons of size and power then ensue. The test has natural extensions when there are unbalanced data, and more than one covariate may be present. Results can be extended to Balanced Incomplete Block Designs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
在品种霜冻试验的双向布局中,在纳入协变量时对异方差进行精确测试
双向布局在谷物产业研究中很常见,因为谷物产业研究通常存在一个或多个协变量。人们普遍认为,在估计固定效应参数时,还应检查可能存在的额外误差方差结构。本文以西澳大利亚霜冻试验的数据集为例,说明了在存在协变量的情况下对异方差进行精确检验的方法。尽管该检验的一般代数在过去的文献中已为人所知,但当存在协变量时,对双向检验的实施还涉及计算问题。在这种情况下,检验结果表明比行业标准具有更大的功率,而且由于其精确的规模,在这种情况下比使用基于近似渐近分布的限制性最大似然比检验(REMLRT)更为可取。本文所考虑的精确检验方法包括在实验设计中建立适当的对比。我们将使用与双向布局线性模型中的指标集相对应的观测数据的具体选择来说明这一点。此外,还提供了一种对检验进行补充的算法。然后对规模和功率进行比较。当存在不平衡数据,并且可能存在一个以上的协变量时,该检验具有自然的扩展性。结果可扩展到平衡不完全区组设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1