The Development and Implementation of a Forensic Education Module for Nebraska Critical Access Providers: A Pilot Study.

Journal of forensic nursing Pub Date : 2024-07-01 Epub Date: 2023-12-27 DOI:10.1097/JFN.0000000000000468
Catherine Magdaleno, Jennifer Cera, Leeza Struwe, Emily Blanchard
{"title":"The Development and Implementation of a Forensic Education Module for Nebraska Critical Access Providers: A Pilot Study.","authors":"Catherine Magdaleno, Jennifer Cera, Leeza Struwe, Emily Blanchard","doi":"10.1097/JFN.0000000000000468","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Sexual assault, intimate partner violence, and human trafficking are traumatic events for individuals and communities. As healthcare shortages increase, critical access hospitals must manage resources to ensure comprehensive forensic care effectively. Current literature indicates a lack of forensic healthcare education for providers within critical access hospitals. This forensic education module for critical access healthcare providers aimed to (a) increase forensic examination competencies, (b) improve forensic interviewing skills, (c) increase provider self-efficacy, and (d) show knowledge retention.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This mixed-methods pilot study utilized a convenience sample of 45 healthcare providers in Nebraska critical access hospitals who presented for the forensic education module training. Repeated measures analysis of variance and paired t tests assessed the aims of this study. Structured surveys gathered qualitative data on three themes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Implementation of the forensic education module showed a statistically significant increase in forensic interviewing skills, nonstatistically significant changes in general self-efficacy, and sustainability of knowledge and self-efficacy over 6 weeks. Analysis also showed a clinically significant increase in provider self-efficacy over 6 weeks. Structured questionnaire responses showed participants valued the content to address their perceived barriers to providing care.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study validates the need for increased education in Nebraska's rural and medically underserved areas to ensure access to forensic care and provision of services. This pilot study shows the potential for forensic education interventions to increase provider competencies and improve provider self-efficacy, with evidence of retention of knowledge and skills.</p>","PeriodicalId":94079,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forensic nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forensic nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JFN.0000000000000468","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/12/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Sexual assault, intimate partner violence, and human trafficking are traumatic events for individuals and communities. As healthcare shortages increase, critical access hospitals must manage resources to ensure comprehensive forensic care effectively. Current literature indicates a lack of forensic healthcare education for providers within critical access hospitals. This forensic education module for critical access healthcare providers aimed to (a) increase forensic examination competencies, (b) improve forensic interviewing skills, (c) increase provider self-efficacy, and (d) show knowledge retention.

Methods: This mixed-methods pilot study utilized a convenience sample of 45 healthcare providers in Nebraska critical access hospitals who presented for the forensic education module training. Repeated measures analysis of variance and paired t tests assessed the aims of this study. Structured surveys gathered qualitative data on three themes.

Results: Implementation of the forensic education module showed a statistically significant increase in forensic interviewing skills, nonstatistically significant changes in general self-efficacy, and sustainability of knowledge and self-efficacy over 6 weeks. Analysis also showed a clinically significant increase in provider self-efficacy over 6 weeks. Structured questionnaire responses showed participants valued the content to address their perceived barriers to providing care.

Conclusions: This study validates the need for increased education in Nebraska's rural and medically underserved areas to ensure access to forensic care and provision of services. This pilot study shows the potential for forensic education interventions to increase provider competencies and improve provider self-efficacy, with evidence of retention of knowledge and skills.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为内布拉斯加州重要医疗机构开发和实施法医教育模块:试点研究。
背景:性侵犯、亲密伴侣暴力和人口贩运是对个人和社区造成创伤的事件。随着医疗服务短缺的加剧,重点医院必须有效管理资源,确保提供全面的法医医疗服务。目前的文献表明,危急重症医院的医疗服务提供者缺乏法医医疗教育。这个针对危急重症医疗服务提供者的法医教育模块旨在:(a)提高法医检查能力;(b)提高法医面谈技能;(c)提高提供者的自我效能;以及(d)显示知识保留情况:这项混合方法试点研究利用了内布拉斯加州关键通道医院的 45 名医疗服务提供者作为便利样本,这些医疗服务提供者参加了法医教育模块培训。重复测量方差分析和配对 t 检验评估了本研究的目的。结构化调查收集了三个主题的定性数据:法医教育模块的实施表明,法医面谈技能在统计学上有显著提高,一般自我效能感在统计学上无显著变化,知识和自我效能感在 6 周内具有可持续性。分析还显示,在 6 周的时间里,医疗服务提供者的自我效能感也有了明显的临床提高。结构化问卷调查结果显示,参与者非常重视解决他们在提供护理时所遇到的障碍的内容:这项研究证明,有必要在内布拉斯加州的农村和医疗服务不足的地区加强教育,以确保获得法医护理和提供服务。这项试点研究表明,法医教育干预措施有可能提高提供者的能力,改善提供者的自我效能,并有证据表明知识和技能得到了保留。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Forensic Mental Health Nurses' Perceptions and Experiences of Trauma-Informed Care in a High-Secure Hospital. A Canadian Sexual Assault Nurse Examiner's Personal Reflection and Ongoing Questioning of Vicarious Trauma. Emergency Department Workers' Perceived Support and Emotional Impact After Workplace Violence. Reporting Intimate Partner Violence in the Healthcare Setting. Pain During Incarceration: Searching for Safety in Hypermasculine Correctional Settings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1