Five years of safety profile of bevacizumab: an analysis of real-world pharmacovigilance and randomized clinical trials.

IF 1.2 Q4 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences Pub Date : 2024-01-02 DOI:10.1186/s40780-023-00314-w
Li Wang, Yibo Fei, Han Qu, Haiyang Zhang, Yuanyuan Wang, Zhenghua Wu, Guorong Fan
{"title":"Five years of safety profile of bevacizumab: an analysis of real-world pharmacovigilance and randomized clinical trials.","authors":"Li Wang, Yibo Fei, Han Qu, Haiyang Zhang, Yuanyuan Wang, Zhenghua Wu, Guorong Fan","doi":"10.1186/s40780-023-00314-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor. It has a wide range of clinical applications in various cancers and retinal diseases. The drugs entered the Chinese market by a large margin in 2017, and the user population changed to some extent. This study reevaluated the safety of bevacizumab through an analysis of the World Pharmacovigilance database (Food and Drug Administration Open Vigil 2.1) in conjunction with a comprehensive meta-analysis of RCTs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Real-world pharmacovigilance data originating from case reports were mined using Open Vigil and coded at the preferred term (PT) level using the Standardized MedDRA Query. Proportional reporting ratios (PRR) and reporting odds ratios (ROR) were used to detect safety signals. Eligible items were screened by searching PubMed, Wanfang, and Web of Science, and data were extracted for systematic review and meta-analysis using RevMan 5.4 software.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Analysis of the drug pharmacovigilance database revealed that the most significant PRRs were limb decortication syndrome (PRR = 2926), stomal varices (PRR = 549), anastomotic (PRR = 457) and ureteral fistula (PRR = 406). Most safety signals at the PT level emerged as various types of injuries, toxicities, operational complications, systemic diseases, various reactions at the administration site, hematological and lymphatic disorders, and gastrointestinal disorders. Adverse reactions such as nasal septal perforation (PRR = 47.502), necrotizing fasciitis (PRR = 20.261), and hypertensive encephalopathy (PRR = 18.288) listed as rare in drug specifications should not be ignored with a high signal in the real world. A total of 8 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the meta-analysis, and the overall risk of adverse reactions following bevacizumab administration was relatively low, indicating a good safety profile (HR = 1.19, 95% CI:0.85 ~ 1.65, p = 0.32).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The frequent adverse reactions of bevacizumab occurring in the real world are consistent with the data provided in RCTs and drug specifications. However, adverse reactions such as nasal septum perforation, necrotizing fasciitis, hypertensive encephalopathy and so on, listed as rare in drug specifications, may have a high signal of correlation in the real world, which all requires active monitoring and timely adjustment of bevacizumab posology during its clinical use.</p>","PeriodicalId":16730,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences","volume":"10 1","pages":"1"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10763108/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmaceutical Health Care and Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40780-023-00314-w","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Bevacizumab is a monoclonal antibody against vascular endothelial growth factor. It has a wide range of clinical applications in various cancers and retinal diseases. The drugs entered the Chinese market by a large margin in 2017, and the user population changed to some extent. This study reevaluated the safety of bevacizumab through an analysis of the World Pharmacovigilance database (Food and Drug Administration Open Vigil 2.1) in conjunction with a comprehensive meta-analysis of RCTs.

Methods: Real-world pharmacovigilance data originating from case reports were mined using Open Vigil and coded at the preferred term (PT) level using the Standardized MedDRA Query. Proportional reporting ratios (PRR) and reporting odds ratios (ROR) were used to detect safety signals. Eligible items were screened by searching PubMed, Wanfang, and Web of Science, and data were extracted for systematic review and meta-analysis using RevMan 5.4 software.

Results: Analysis of the drug pharmacovigilance database revealed that the most significant PRRs were limb decortication syndrome (PRR = 2926), stomal varices (PRR = 549), anastomotic (PRR = 457) and ureteral fistula (PRR = 406). Most safety signals at the PT level emerged as various types of injuries, toxicities, operational complications, systemic diseases, various reactions at the administration site, hematological and lymphatic disorders, and gastrointestinal disorders. Adverse reactions such as nasal septal perforation (PRR = 47.502), necrotizing fasciitis (PRR = 20.261), and hypertensive encephalopathy (PRR = 18.288) listed as rare in drug specifications should not be ignored with a high signal in the real world. A total of 8 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in the meta-analysis, and the overall risk of adverse reactions following bevacizumab administration was relatively low, indicating a good safety profile (HR = 1.19, 95% CI:0.85 ~ 1.65, p = 0.32).

Conclusion: The frequent adverse reactions of bevacizumab occurring in the real world are consistent with the data provided in RCTs and drug specifications. However, adverse reactions such as nasal septum perforation, necrotizing fasciitis, hypertensive encephalopathy and so on, listed as rare in drug specifications, may have a high signal of correlation in the real world, which all requires active monitoring and timely adjustment of bevacizumab posology during its clinical use.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
贝伐珠单抗五年来的安全性概况:真实世界药物警戒和随机临床试验分析。
目的:贝伐珠单抗是一种抗血管内皮生长因子的单克隆抗体:贝伐单抗是一种抗血管内皮生长因子的单克隆抗体。它在各种癌症和视网膜疾病中有着广泛的临床应用。该药于2017年大举进入中国市场,使用人群发生了一定变化。本研究通过对世界药物警戒数据库(Food and Drug Administration Open Vigil 2.1)的分析,结合对RCTs的综合荟萃分析,重新评估了贝伐珠单抗的安全性:方法:使用 Open Vigil 对源自病例报告的真实世界药物警戒数据进行挖掘,并使用标准化 MedDRA 查询对首选术语 (PT) 进行编码。使用比例报告比 (PRR) 和报告几率比 (ROR) 来检测安全性信号。通过搜索 PubMed、万方和 Web of Science 筛选符合条件的项目,并使用 RevMan 5.4 软件提取数据进行系统综述和荟萃分析:对药物警戒数据库的分析表明,最重要的PRR是肢体脱位综合征(PRR=2926)、口腔静脉曲张(PRR=549)、吻合口(PRR=457)和输尿管瘘(PRR=406)。大多数 PT 级安全信号表现为各种类型的损伤、毒性、操作并发症、全身性疾病、用药部位的各种反应、血液和淋巴系统疾病以及胃肠道疾病。鼻中隔穿孔(PRR=47.502)、坏死性筋膜炎(PRR=20.261)和高血压脑病(PRR=18.288)等在药品说明书中被列为罕见的不良反应在现实世界中的高信号不容忽视。荟萃分析共纳入了 8 项随机对照试验(RCT),贝伐珠单抗用药后不良反应的总体风险相对较低,表明其安全性良好(HR = 1.19,95% CI:0.85 ~ 1.65,P = 0.32):贝伐珠单抗在现实世界中频繁出现的不良反应与研究性临床试验和药品说明书中提供的数据一致。结论:贝伐珠单抗在真实世界中的常见不良反应与 RCT 和药物说明书中提供的数据一致,但药物说明书中列为罕见的鼻中隔穿孔、坏死性筋膜炎、高血压脑病等不良反应在真实世界中可能具有较高的相关性,这都需要在临床使用过程中积极监测并及时调整贝伐珠单抗的体位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
29
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Impact of pharmacist-led aminoglycoside stewardship: a 10-year observational study. The risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding associated with concomitant proton pump inhibitor administration during dual antiplatelet therapy with aspirin and prasugrel: a retrospective single-center study. Efficacy of a melatonin receptor agonist and orexin receptor antagonists in preventing delirium symptoms in the olderly patients with stroke: a retrospective study. In-vivo evaluation of analgesic and anti-inflammatory activities of the 80% methanol extract of Acacia seyal stem bark in rodent models. Study on the chemical stability of β-lactam antibiotics in concomitant simple suspensions with magnesium oxide.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1