Transradial artery access for carotid artery stenting: A pooled analysis.

IF 1.3 Q4 NEUROIMAGING Neuroradiology Journal Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-01-03 DOI:10.1177/19714009231224410
Sávio Batista, Leonardo de Barros Oliveira, Marcelo Porto Sousa, Agostinho C Pinheiro, Jordana Borges, Laís Santana, Raphael Bertani, Filipi Fim Andreão, Adria Simões, José Alberto Almeida Filho
{"title":"Transradial artery access for carotid artery stenting: A pooled analysis.","authors":"Sávio Batista, Leonardo de Barros Oliveira, Marcelo Porto Sousa, Agostinho C Pinheiro, Jordana Borges, Laís Santana, Raphael Bertani, Filipi Fim Andreão, Adria Simões, José Alberto Almeida Filho","doi":"10.1177/19714009231224410","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Carotid artery stenting (CAS) through transradial access (TRA) is emerging as an alternative to carotid endarterectomy. However, the current evidence base is limited, mainly comprising single-center studies.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess the safety and effectiveness of TRA for CAS, providing evidence to support clinical decisions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted searches on PUBMED, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases, including studies on TRA for CAS. Studies with fewer than 20 patients, non-primary outcomes, and non-full-text articles were excluded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We analyzed 14 studies involving 1,166 patients who underwent CAS via TRA. Procedural success rate was high in 13 studies, with a 95% rate (95% CI; 92%-98%). Crossover to TFA access was observed in 12 studies at 6% (95% CI: 3%-9%). Transradial access failure was reported in four studies, with a rate of 0% (95% CI: 0%-0%). Cannulation failure resulted in a rate of 4% (95% CI: 2%-7%). Asymptomatic radial artery occlusion (ARAO) occurred at a rate of 2% based on eight studies (95% CI: 0%-5%). Forearm hematoma was reported in 10 studies, with an occurrence of 1% (95% CI: 0%-2%). Cerebral vascular attacks (CAV) within 30 days were assessed in 13 studies, indicating a 2% occurrence (95% CI: 1%-2%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings suggest that TRA for CAS yields promising outcomes with high success rates and low complication rates. Further research should focus on randomized controlled trials and long-term outcomes to validate and extend findings.</p>","PeriodicalId":47358,"journal":{"name":"Neuroradiology Journal","volume":" ","pages":"546-555"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11528741/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neuroradiology Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/19714009231224410","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROIMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) through transradial access (TRA) is emerging as an alternative to carotid endarterectomy. However, the current evidence base is limited, mainly comprising single-center studies.

Objective: This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to assess the safety and effectiveness of TRA for CAS, providing evidence to support clinical decisions.

Methods: We conducted searches on PUBMED, Cochrane Library, Embase, and Web of Science databases, including studies on TRA for CAS. Studies with fewer than 20 patients, non-primary outcomes, and non-full-text articles were excluded.

Results: We analyzed 14 studies involving 1,166 patients who underwent CAS via TRA. Procedural success rate was high in 13 studies, with a 95% rate (95% CI; 92%-98%). Crossover to TFA access was observed in 12 studies at 6% (95% CI: 3%-9%). Transradial access failure was reported in four studies, with a rate of 0% (95% CI: 0%-0%). Cannulation failure resulted in a rate of 4% (95% CI: 2%-7%). Asymptomatic radial artery occlusion (ARAO) occurred at a rate of 2% based on eight studies (95% CI: 0%-5%). Forearm hematoma was reported in 10 studies, with an occurrence of 1% (95% CI: 0%-2%). Cerebral vascular attacks (CAV) within 30 days were assessed in 13 studies, indicating a 2% occurrence (95% CI: 1%-2%).

Conclusion: The findings suggest that TRA for CAS yields promising outcomes with high success rates and low complication rates. Further research should focus on randomized controlled trials and long-term outcomes to validate and extend findings.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经桡动脉进入颈动脉支架置入术:汇总分析。
导言:通过经桡动脉入路(TRA)进行颈动脉支架植入术(CAS)正在成为颈动脉内膜剥脱术的替代方法。然而,目前的证据基础有限,主要包括单中心研究:本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在评估 TRA 用于 CAS 的安全性和有效性,为临床决策提供证据支持:我们在 PUBMED、Cochrane Library、Embase 和 Web of Science 数据库中进行了检索,包括有关 TRA 治疗 CAS 的研究。结果:我们分析了 14 项研究,涉及 1,000 名患者:我们分析了 14 项研究,涉及 1,166 名通过 TRA 接受 CAS 的患者。13项研究的手术成功率很高,达到95%(95% CI;92%-98%)。有 12 项研究观察到经桡动脉入路的交叉率为 6%(95% CI:3%-9%)。有四项研究报告经桡动脉入路失败,失败率为 0% (95% CI: 0%-0%)。插管失败率为 4%(95% CI:2%-7%)。根据 8 项研究,无症状桡动脉闭塞 (ARAO) 发生率为 2%(95% CI:0%-5%)。10项研究报告了前臂血肿,发生率为1%(95% CI:0%-2%)。13项研究对30天内的脑血管病发作(CAV)进行了评估,结果显示发生率为2%(95% CI:1%-2%):研究结果表明,CAS 的 TRA 具有成功率高、并发症发生率低的良好效果。进一步的研究应侧重于随机对照试验和长期结果,以验证和扩展研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Neuroradiology Journal
Neuroradiology Journal NEUROIMAGING-
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
101
期刊介绍: NRJ - The Neuroradiology Journal (formerly Rivista di Neuroradiologia) is the official journal of the Italian Association of Neuroradiology and of the several Scientific Societies from all over the world. Founded in 1988 as Rivista di Neuroradiologia, of June 2006 evolved in NRJ - The Neuroradiology Journal. It is published bimonthly.
期刊最新文献
Photon-counting CT imaging of a patient with coiled and untreated intracranial saccular aneurysms. Woven EndoBridge 17 device for intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Outcome of acute ischemic stroke with absent opacification of the cervical internal carotid artery at CT-angiography after endovascular treatment. The teacher-mentee bond in medicine. Impact of workflow times on successful reperfusion after endovascular treatment in the late time window.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1