Contextual factors for understanding the heterogeneity of outcomes of a policy of exemption from payment for care in Chad

Abstract

Chad has one of the highest maternal and infant mortality rates in the world. Efforts to reduce these rates have led to the introduction of fee exemption and community involvement initiatives to further encourage the use of health services. Despite the introduction of these initiatives, inequalities in access to and use of health facilities persist. The aim of this study is to understand why and how the same action, implemented in a quasi-homogeneous way, produced contrasting results in different health centers. A multiple, contrasting case study was used to analyze the outcomes of pediatrics consultations and deliveries in four health centers in the Bénoye and Beinamar districts. Data were collected through individual interviews (n=26) and focus groups (n=22) with women beneficiaries, community health workers, and health care providers. The qualitative software QDA Miner was used to process the data. The study revealed that the organizational and managerial capacities of the providers and community actors would explain the heterogeneity of the results observed. Contextual factors such as the remoteness of services or the impassability and dangerousness of roads accentuated the disparities in the results observed. The results of this study show that human and contextual factors would explain the heterogeneity of the observed effects.