Evaluation of healthcare professionals' experiences of taking telephone calls from parents of children with congenital heart disease. A risky business.

IF 1.3 4区 医学 Q3 NURSING Journal of Child Health Care Pub Date : 2024-01-04 DOI:10.1177/13674935231222943
K Gaskin, A Seale, J Menzies
{"title":"Evaluation of healthcare professionals' experiences of taking telephone calls from parents of children with congenital heart disease. A risky business.","authors":"K Gaskin, A Seale, J Menzies","doi":"10.1177/13674935231222943","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The Congenital Heart Disease Standards for England indicate that parents and children should have access to a 24-h telephone advice service, however, little is known about existing services. This paper presents phase two of a mixed-methods service evaluation, which aimed to evaluate staff experiences of telephone communication with these parents. All nursing and support staff in a single specialist children's cardiac surgical centre were invited to participate in an online survey during July-November 2019. Data were descriptively and thematically analysed. Participants (<i>N</i> = 39) were predominantly nurses (<i>n</i> = 32, 82%) with 64.1% (<i>n</i> = 25) working in the speciality >10 years. Positive experiences included: signposting and preventing further deterioration; supporting families to get expert advice quickly; providing reassurance. Challenging experiences included: offering advice without being able to see the child, dealing with telephone calls alongside busy workload; and parents running out of medications and telephoning out of hours. In conclusion, taking telephone calls were perceived to be time consuming and are potentially high risk. A standardised approach to assessment, intervention and documentation was deemed necessary. Implementation of an updated parental early warning tool was recommended, along with staff and parental education.</p>","PeriodicalId":54388,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Child Health Care","volume":" ","pages":"13674935231222943"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Child Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/13674935231222943","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Congenital Heart Disease Standards for England indicate that parents and children should have access to a 24-h telephone advice service, however, little is known about existing services. This paper presents phase two of a mixed-methods service evaluation, which aimed to evaluate staff experiences of telephone communication with these parents. All nursing and support staff in a single specialist children's cardiac surgical centre were invited to participate in an online survey during July-November 2019. Data were descriptively and thematically analysed. Participants (N = 39) were predominantly nurses (n = 32, 82%) with 64.1% (n = 25) working in the speciality >10 years. Positive experiences included: signposting and preventing further deterioration; supporting families to get expert advice quickly; providing reassurance. Challenging experiences included: offering advice without being able to see the child, dealing with telephone calls alongside busy workload; and parents running out of medications and telephoning out of hours. In conclusion, taking telephone calls were perceived to be time consuming and are potentially high risk. A standardised approach to assessment, intervention and documentation was deemed necessary. Implementation of an updated parental early warning tool was recommended, along with staff and parental education.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估医护人员接听先天性心脏病患儿家长电话的经验。有风险的生意
英格兰先天性心脏病标准》指出,家长和儿童应能获得 24 小时电话咨询服务,但人们对现有服务知之甚少。本文介绍了混合方法服务评估的第二阶段,旨在评估工作人员与这些家长进行电话沟通的经验。在 2019 年 7 月至 11 月期间,我们邀请了一家儿童心脏外科专科中心的所有护理和辅助人员参与在线调查。我们对数据进行了描述性分析和主题分析。参与者(人数=39)主要是护士(人数=32,82%),其中64.1%(人数=25)在该专科工作超过10年。积极的经验包括:指引和防止病情进一步恶化;支持家庭迅速获得专家建议;提供保证。具有挑战性的经历包括:在无法见到患儿的情况下提供建议,在繁忙的工作之余处理电话;家长用完药物后在非工作时间打电话。总之,接听电话被认为非常耗时,而且具有潜在的高风险。评估、干预和记录的标准化方法被认为是必要的。建议采用最新的家长预警工具,并对员工和家长进行教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Child Health Care
Journal of Child Health Care NURSING-PEDIATRICS
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
15.80%
发文量
60
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Child Health Care is a broad ranging, international, professionally-oriented, interdisciplinary and peer reviewed journal. It focuses on issues related to the health and health care of neonates, children, young people and their families, including areas such as illness, disability, complex needs, well-being, quality of life and mental health care in a diverse range of settings. The Journal of Child Health Care publishes original theoretical, empirical and review papers which have application to a wide variety of disciplines.
期刊最新文献
Maintaining health-related quality of life and sense of belonging for pediatric patients with chronic illnesses by using a telepresence robot. Attitudes of health and social care professionals towards the use of blended diets for enteral tube feeding for children and young people. Relationship functioning and impact of health coverage models for parents of childhood cancer patients: A systematic review. Acceptability and feasibility of a group-based intervention to improve outcomes for children at risk for developmental delays in Kenya: A piloted randomized trial. Postoperative bowel function in children operated for Hirschsprung's disease in a low-income setting: Institution-based cross-sectional study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1