Recommendations for best practice for iron speciation by competitive ligand exchange adsorptive cathodic stripping voltammetry with salicylaldoxime

IF 3 3区 地球科学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Marine Chemistry Pub Date : 2024-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.marchem.2023.104348
Léo Mahieu , Dario Omanović , Hannah Whitby , Kristen N. Buck , Salvatore Caprara , Pascal Salaün
{"title":"Recommendations for best practice for iron speciation by competitive ligand exchange adsorptive cathodic stripping voltammetry with salicylaldoxime","authors":"Léo Mahieu ,&nbsp;Dario Omanović ,&nbsp;Hannah Whitby ,&nbsp;Kristen N. Buck ,&nbsp;Salvatore Caprara ,&nbsp;Pascal Salaün","doi":"10.1016/j.marchem.2023.104348","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>The method of competitive ligand exchange followed by adsorptive </span>cathodic stripping voltammetry (CLE-AdCSV) allows for the determination of dissolved iron (DFe) organic speciation parameters, i.e., ligand concentration (L</span><sub>Fe</sub>) and conditional stability constant (log <span><math><msubsup><mi>K</mi><mrow><mi>Fe</mi><mo>′</mo><mi>L</mi></mrow><mtext>cond</mtext></msubsup></math></span><span>). Investigation of DFe organic speciation by CLE-AdCSV has been conducted in a wide range of marine systems, but aspects of its application pose challenges that have yet to be explicitly addressed. Here, we present a set of observations and recommendations to work toward establishing best practice for DFe organic speciation measurements using the added ligand salicylaldoxime (SA). We detail conditioning procedures to ensure a stable AdCSV signal and discuss the processes at play during conditioning. We also present step-by-step guidelines to simplify CLE-AdCSV data treatment and interpretation using the softwares ECDSoft and ProMCC and a custom spreadsheet. We validate our application and interpretation methodology with the model siderophore<span> deferoxamine B (DFO-B) in a natural seawater sample. The reproducibility of our application and interpretation methodology was evaluated by running duplicate titrations on 19 samples, many of which had been refrozen prior to the duplicate analysis. Nevertheless, 50% of the duplicate analyses agreed within 10% of their relative standard deviation (RSD), and up to 80% within 25% RSD, for both L</span></span><sub>Fe</sub> and log <span><math><msubsup><mi>K</mi><mrow><mi>Fe</mi><mo>′</mo><mi>L</mi></mrow><mtext>cond</mtext></msubsup></math></span>. Finally, we compared the sequential addition and equilibration of DFe and SA with overnight equilibration after simultaneous addition of DFe and SA on 24 samples. We found a rather good agreement between both procedures, with 60% of samples within 25% RSD for L<sub>Fe</sub> (and 43% of samples for log <span><math><msubsup><mi>K</mi><mrow><mi>Fe</mi><mo>′</mo><mi>L</mi></mrow><mtext>cond</mtext></msubsup></math></span>), and it was not possible to predict differences in L<sub>Fe</sub> or log <span><math><msubsup><mi>K</mi><mrow><mi>Fe</mi><mo>′</mo><mi>L</mi></mrow><mtext>cond</mtext></msubsup></math></span> based on the method applied, suggesting specific association/dissociation kinetics for different ligand assemblages. Further investigation of the equilibration kinetics against SA may be helpful as a potential way to distinguish natural ligand assemblages.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18219,"journal":{"name":"Marine Chemistry","volume":"259 ","pages":"Article 104348"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marine Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304420323001445","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The method of competitive ligand exchange followed by adsorptive cathodic stripping voltammetry (CLE-AdCSV) allows for the determination of dissolved iron (DFe) organic speciation parameters, i.e., ligand concentration (LFe) and conditional stability constant (log KFeLcond). Investigation of DFe organic speciation by CLE-AdCSV has been conducted in a wide range of marine systems, but aspects of its application pose challenges that have yet to be explicitly addressed. Here, we present a set of observations and recommendations to work toward establishing best practice for DFe organic speciation measurements using the added ligand salicylaldoxime (SA). We detail conditioning procedures to ensure a stable AdCSV signal and discuss the processes at play during conditioning. We also present step-by-step guidelines to simplify CLE-AdCSV data treatment and interpretation using the softwares ECDSoft and ProMCC and a custom spreadsheet. We validate our application and interpretation methodology with the model siderophore deferoxamine B (DFO-B) in a natural seawater sample. The reproducibility of our application and interpretation methodology was evaluated by running duplicate titrations on 19 samples, many of which had been refrozen prior to the duplicate analysis. Nevertheless, 50% of the duplicate analyses agreed within 10% of their relative standard deviation (RSD), and up to 80% within 25% RSD, for both LFe and log KFeLcond. Finally, we compared the sequential addition and equilibration of DFe and SA with overnight equilibration after simultaneous addition of DFe and SA on 24 samples. We found a rather good agreement between both procedures, with 60% of samples within 25% RSD for LFe (and 43% of samples for log KFeLcond), and it was not possible to predict differences in LFe or log KFeLcond based on the method applied, suggesting specific association/dissociation kinetics for different ligand assemblages. Further investigation of the equilibration kinetics against SA may be helpful as a potential way to distinguish natural ligand assemblages.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用水杨醛肟竞争性配体交换吸附阴极剥离伏安法进行铁离子分析的最佳实践建议
竞争性配体交换后吸附阴极剥离伏安法(CLE-AdCSV)可以确定溶解铁(DFe)的有机物标样参数,即配体浓度(LFe)和条件稳定常数(log KFe′Lcond)。通过 CLE-AdCSV 对 DFe 有机物种的研究已在多种海洋系统中进行,但其应用所面临的挑战仍有待明确解决。在此,我们提出了一系列意见和建议,以便为使用添加配体水杨醛肟(SA)进行 DFe 有机标样测量建立最佳实践。我们详细介绍了确保 AdCSV 信号稳定的调节程序,并讨论了调节过程中的作用过程。我们还介绍了使用 ECDSoft 和 ProMCC 软件以及自定义电子表格简化 CLE-AdCSV 数据处理和解释的分步指南。我们利用天然海水样本中的模型苷元去氧胺 B(DFO-B)验证了我们的应用和解释方法。通过对 19 份样品进行重复滴定,评估了我们的应用和解释方法的可重复性,其中许多样品在重复分析前已被重新冷冻。尽管如此,50% 的重复分析结果在 10%的相对标准偏差 (RSD) 范围内一致,高达 80% 的重复分析结果在 25% 的 RSD 范围内一致。最后,我们比较了在 24 个样品中同时添加 DFe 和 SA 后,DFe 和 SA 的顺序添加和平衡与隔夜平衡。我们发现这两种方法的一致性相当好,60% 的样品 LFe 的 RSD 值在 25% 以内(43% 的样品 KFe′Lcond 的对数值在 25% 以内),而且无法根据所采用的方法预测 LFe 或 KFe′Lcond 对数值的差异,这表明不同配体组合具有特定的结合/解离动力学。进一步研究与 SA 相对应的平衡动力学可能有助于区分天然配体组合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Marine Chemistry
Marine Chemistry 化学-海洋学
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
3.30%
发文量
70
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: Marine Chemistry is an international medium for the publication of original studies and occasional reviews in the field of chemistry in the marine environment, with emphasis on the dynamic approach. The journal endeavours to cover all aspects, from chemical processes to theoretical and experimental work, and, by providing a central channel of communication, to speed the flow of information in this relatively new and rapidly expanding discipline.
期刊最新文献
Reactivity and fluxes of antimony in a macrotidal estuarine salinity gradient: Insights from single and triple quadrupole ICP-MS performances Nitrous oxide variability along an estuary influenced by agricultural land use (Guadalquivir estuary, SW Spain) Tracing marine and terrestrial biochemical signatures of particulate organic matter in an Arctic fjord (Kongsfjorden) Seasonal variation of CO2 air-sea flux and effects of warming in the Kuroshio Current of the East China Sea Dynamic manganese cycling in the northern Gulf of Mexico
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1